BREAKING: Tokenized equities saw a record $3.4 billion in volume for the month of June.
This marks +279% month-over-month growth and +1,400% year-over-year growth.
The growth was primarily driven by SpaceX's record IPO and surging demand for 24/7 trading.
Furthermore, the Solana network now accounts for over 90% of volume traded in these assets.
A substantial amount of this volume growth has been driven by Jupiter, the largest onchain platform in the world, which has seen MoM volume growth of +56%, with ~60% of tokenized equity volume happening during off hours and weekends.
Tokenized asset growth is exploding.
@BTCsessions I want the crazy fanatical fundamentalists protecting the base layer. That's how it survives long-term as decentralized and not corporate or government captured.
In Europe, DAC8 has turned “Know Your Customer” into “Kill Your Customer.”
Today, Bull Bitcoin is officially opening the first legal front against DAC8.
We have brought a case before France’s Conseil d’État, the country’s highest administrative court, to strike down the decree implementing DAC8 in French law.
Since January 1, 2026, DAC8 has required crypto-asset service providers to systematically collect user and transaction data and subsequently report it to national tax authorities.
These authorities will automatically exchange this information across the European Union and with tax administrations in other participating countries around the world.
The result is a massive international financial-data honeypot linking people’s legal identities, home addresses and crypto activity, including information with no relevance whatsoever to taxation.
This is grossly disproportionate and poses a serious threat to the physical safety of crypto holders and their families.
Until now, most customer data remained within each crypto-asset service provider unless a suspicious transaction was reported or a competent authority made a lawful request.
DAC8 replaces this model with the systematic reporting and cross-border sharing of highly sensitive financial information.
The more authorities, civil servants, contractors, systems and foreign jurisdictions that have access to this data, the greater the risk that it will eventually be leaked, stolen, illegally accessed or sold to criminal organizations.
At the same time, kidnappings and violent attacks against crypto holders and their families are rising, with leaked personal and financial data increasingly being used to identify and target victims.
France has already suffered numerous breaches of highly sensitive government and financial databases.
Given enough time, a database of this scale is almost certain to be breached.
When that happens, criminal organizations will gain a ready-made map of who to target and where to find them.
This is not responsible financial oversight. It is a recipe for disaster.
We filed our initial application before the Conseil d'État on February 24, 2026, followed by a substantive legal brief setting out the full grounds of our case.
This is not a symbolic gesture. It is a serious legal action, grounded in law and handled by experienced legal professionals.
We are seeking the outright annulment of the French decree implementing DAC8’s crypto-asset reporting regime, on the grounds that automated mass financial-data collection violates fundamental human rights.
If necessary, we are prepared to take this fight before the Court of Justice of the European Union and the French Constitutional Council.
A victory in France could establish an important judicial precedent and provide a blueprint for other European actors seeking to fight DAC8 in their own countries.
Someone has to draw a line in the sand.
Bull Bitcoin is willing to do it.
In the video, Bull Bitcoin founder @francispouliot_ takes the stage at @BTCPrague to expose the threat DAC8 poses to the privacy and physical safety of crypto holders and explain why Bull Bitcoin has decided to lead this fight.
Alongside this legal challenge, we are launching STOP DAC8: a complete, fully sourced resource for citizens, journalists and policymakers.
More info 👇
Is Bitcoin Core compromised? Matthew Kratter breaks down why Core devs are compromised, the migration to Bitcoin Knots, and what self-custody Bitcoiners must do now.
Matthew covers UTXO bloat, OP_RETURN uncapping, and BIP-110 - plus Michael Saylor's Ethereum pivot and why plebs are Bitcoin's immune system.
Essential for anyone running a node or defending decentralization.
📞 Schedule a FREE call: https://t.co/6eYA7Wsa4M
Full episode below
New podcast out. It is a banger on the elites and the crime wave in Bitcoin and Core Devs. Total domination runs on two engines Terror because it isolates people, preventing them from organising together Ideology, a ubiquitous explanation that is unfalsifiable. The ideal subject for the regime is not a fanatic, but a person who can no longer discern between fact and fiction, and true and false. This is one of the nefarious constructions of the Fabians controling FIC, social media, and AI by the global elites.
They only trust what they are told, not what they see. It’s not that they believe the lie, it’s that are too exhausted to form another belief. This was said before the exhausting technology of social media was around, before the insistence that we a must have the right opinion on everything, on things like climate science and immunology, that most of us couldn’t possibly have expertise in.
To avoid isolation we have to carry the right opinion or stay silent, so we select the opinion of the authorized experts, because we are too exhausted to use our own resources and too frightened to be isolated from society and the market.
Even when their experts say ridiculous things, MSTR or STRC are better than Bitcoin, like human sex categories are made up of declarations and fabrics, people fall in because of the energy and the cost to resist.
You now inhabit this clown world today .
https://t.co/zqcShc0lXZ
They couldn't ban Bitcoin. Every government that tried failed.
So the question changed: if you can't ban it, can you just make it too heavy for ordinary people to carry?
Rustin spent 3 days in a basement pulling the receipts on the code change, the money behind the developers who made it, and why nobody with a platform said a word. 👇
@BTCsessions Slurping at the trough of Silicon Valley Slop. Follow Joey to be the exit liquidity for Space X, AI, and next to come Quantum. I'm going to help Saylor by buying spot BTC. I'm going to help Bitcoin by running Knots BIP 110.
Arguments against BIP-110
"It hurts scripting."
Only a handful of extreme edge cases are affected. Normal Bitcoin usage is unchanged.
"It's censorship."
Bitcoin already imposes limits on block size, script size, transaction weight, and opcodes. That's not censorship—it's protocol design. Bitcoin is a monetary network, not a general-purpose computer.
"It reduces innovation."
Bitcoin's most successful innovations—exchanges, Lightning, custody, hardware wallets, sidechains—were built around the protocol, not by making the base layer endlessly more complex.
"Developers should be free to build anything."
Developers remain free to build anything they want. The question is whether every node operator should be required to validate and store it forever.
"Bitcoin should be neutral."
Bitcoin is neutral with respect to users. It does not need to be neutral with respect to every possible use case. Every protocol makes tradeoffs.
"Future applications may need this."
Future applications can justify future upgrades. Bitcoin should not carry permanent complexity today for hypothetical use cases tomorrow.
@mattkratter Unfortunately, DIY costs have doubled since Paul Lamb did his video. The increasing cost only confirms the thesis that something needs to be done about blockchain bloat. Nodes should not only be for the elite.
Unless @Apple's decision to terminate @craigraw's Apple Developer account is reversed by June 30, all new installs of Sparrow will fail, and development on macOS will end. If you value Sparrow, a repost would help. @AppleSupport
@ilbtccouncil@jackmallers@Strike So, how does it not hit the tokenization of Wall Street, AI token payment, and AI agent transactions? It looks like they just shit the bed on any future investment in the State.