If Canada is the best, why did Carney live abroad until two years ago?
Why does he have three passports?
Why did he move his company, Brookfield, from Toronto to New York?
Why does all of his family live in the U.S.?
Why doe he want to join China's new world order?
"I feel absolutely vindicated."
Riley Gaines reacted to the Supreme Court's decision allowing states to keep biological males out of women's sports, saying years of criticism and personal attacks only make the ruling more meaningful.
Gaines said she hopes the decision serves as a "clarion call" for more female athletes to "link arms," arguing the ruling will have a lasting impact for future generations of girls, including her daughter.
@HansFiene How does one deal with the problem of original sin apart from baptism? Protestants are always trying to separate the work of the Spirit from God's ordained means.
"34 hours after he was vaccinated, he passed away in his bassinet."
"The aluminum level in his blood was 95 micrograms per liter. Anything over 50 micrograms per liter in an adult is toxic."
SIDS is a cover-up term to protect the guilty...big pharma.
Ontario doctors are under orders to lie on your death certificate.
Not shade the truth. Lie.
Here it is. Official. In writing. From the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
"The illness, disease or disability leading to the request for MAID is to be recorded as the cause of death. The certificate cannot include any reference to MAID or the medications administered."
Source: CPSO: Medical Certificates of Death in the MAID Context
Why are you quoting someone you’ve previously called a liar, and said no one should listen to him?
1. “Antisemitism” is a fake sin. You can’t define it. And it means nothing. It’s like calling someone Snarffle Piddler or a Chupacabra Snarkler. “Antisemite” is what you call someone when you can’t find an actual sin they’ve committed.
2. Tucker has never indicated, supported, or displayed “Jew Hate” (an actual sin). But he has criticized Israelis (not a sin).
3. It’s a sin to lie about people. Lying about Christians? Extra sinful. Lying about people who love Jesus (Tucker) to benefit people who oppose Jesus (Israelis)? Extra extra sinful. It doesn’t make it better just because you cite someone you’ve already identified as a liar (pssst: it makes it worse).
You’re cursing people who bless Christ to bless people who curse Christ. Thats backwards. Quit it.
I used to be entirely in the camp that said you should kick your kids out at 18 and force them to live independently and make their own way in the world. I don’t feel that way at all anymore. I want all my kids to live with us until they get married. Even after they’re married, if they want to live on our property, or close by, my wife and I would love that.
The important thing is to teach your kids responsibility, which we’re doing. They need to contribute and help around the house, which all of our kids do from a very young age. Provided you aren’t raising ungrateful useless moochers, why kick them out? Why drive them away from your family home? I don’t see the point in it anymore. I actually like my kids and like being around them.
Maybe they’ll all end up scattered to the wind. But I’d prefer to keep the family together. Why wouldn’t I?
He murdered a woman in Vancouver in 2012.
Then he was released, and later caught torturing animals.
And just yesterday, he murdered a clerk in cold blood at a corner store in Montreal.
This violence and chaos must end. Keep repeat violent criminals behind bars, where they belong: https://t.co/4slSsxbA6o
“And so all Israel will be saved.” - Romans 11:26
Many people like to point me to this verse in an attempt to disprove preterist supersessionism. I suspect they do so without realizing that Romans 9–11 forms a single, unified discourse that must be read and understood as a whole.
Romans 9 establishes the foundation: God’s promises to Israel have not failed because not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.
Romans 10 explains the current situation: Israel’s unbelief stems from pursuing righteousness by works rather than faith in Christ (10:3–4), leading to stumbling over the stumbling stone (Christ).
Romans 11 ties it all together as the climax: God has not rejected His people (11:1–2), proven by the present-time remnant chosen by grace.
Treating these chapters in isolation distorts Paul’s intent and leads to confusion or misapplication. Much of what Paul describes unfolds in urgent, present-tense language tied to events in Paul’s own generation.
Paul provides a resounding affirmation that God remains faithful to His foreknown people, the elect remnant He has always preserved by grace. He points to himself as living proof: “I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.” He is part of that remnant, as are the thousands of believing Jews...in the first-century church.
We can see how Paul’s words in Romans 11 unfold: a partial hardening in his generation ‘until’ the fullness of the Gentiles comes in, then ‘all Israel’—the full elect remnant of true Israel (Rom. 9:6)—is saved as the New Covenant kingdom stands unveiled after AD 70.
This does not preclude individual Jews coming to faith today (and some do, to God’s glory), but it does close the old covenant era and confirm the Church as the one people of God in Christ.
If someone insists on returning to literal animal sacrifices after Christ, they actually have a bigger theological problem. Hebrews explicitly says:
“Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin.” (Hebrews 10:18)
So if Ezekiel 40–47 requires future sin offerings, then you are forced into one of two conclusions:
Christ’s sacrifice wasn’t truly final, or
Ezekiel’s temple vision is pointing to something typological and fulfilled in Christ’s redemptive work, not a future Levitical system.
That objection would only make sense if I were arbitrarily spiritualizing things, but that’s not what’s happening. I’m letting the New Testament interpret the Old Testament, which is the standard hermeneutic used by the apostles themselves.
The New Testament repeatedly takes things that were once physical shadows and shows their greater fulfillment in Christ.
Ezekiel’s vision itself shows it is symbolic and visionary, not a literal construction blueprint:
The river flowing from the temple (Ezekiel 47) becomes deeper without tributaries and brings life to the Dead Sea.
The land distribution and temple measurements do not match historical Israel.
The sacrifices described would contradict the finality of Christ’s sacrifice.
This is why many interpreters (including amillennialists) understand Ezekiel’s temple as a prophetic picture of the restored presence of God among His people, ultimately fulfilled in Christ and His Church.
The Bible ends with the ultimate fulfillment in the New Jerusalem, where we are told explicitly:
“I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb.” (Revelation 21:22)