@1adass Let us hope ADASS can impress upon him that social care matters not just because of the impact on the nhs. ADASS is more likely to succeed if it learns to understand need as it impacts on the people it serves, not resources
https://t.co/yFpXn4Ezjf
@MelanieNottsDA@SKinnock@1adass It has long been in successive governments interests to talk big about social care. It conceals the truth - perpetual inaction over funding made possible by a system that calibrates need to whatever resource the political system happens to make available. Time to wake up
@cath_roff@socfuture@UKLabour@tomriordan It is also factually correct that the ADASS Annual Budget Survey claims its members have actually made billions of pounds of ‘efficiency’ savings, painlessly delivered through best practice building on strengths
@cath_roff@socfuture@UKLabour@tomriordan It is factually correct that all needs all councils have deemed eligible are always met. That is because eligibility is determined by the available budget. In this way Directors fatally undermine their own case for more funding
📢NEW BLOG POST!
'Abolishing charges for non-residential care for working age people only would be both financially viable and politically feasible. It would also be unequivocally morally sound.' #CareCharging https://t.co/oB0GGI8DDj
@JonGlasby@ImpAdultCare Coproduction can never be more than tokenistic window dressing in a system that systemically has to disempower service users in order to standardise and calibrate their needs to the local resource. Why does IMPACT not support the campaign for real change? https://t.co/gKRRXYJdAH
@BryonyShannon Changing the language without changing the story is just window dressing. Social care has done that so many times. It doesn’t work. Why not support the Campaign for Real Care proposed Charter for the Right to Wellbeing for real change
@RichardnotatKF Yes to avoid the narcissism of small differences - but surely also yes to open and honest debate about the big differences. We will be failing if we pretend all differences are small when they are not
@DavidJ_Brindle@cmm_magazine@RichardnotatKF@lammadao Yes to the need for a unifying focus in the search for change, David - why not the Campaign for Real Care’s Charter for the Right to Wellbeing? https://t.co/nj5jKdKEzK
Radical, politically challenging yes, but lawful and no financial risk
@DavidJ_Brindle@CentreForCare If you will allow me a PS, David….in your Foreword to our book you say it is personal budgets we disagree about. They are a completely different concept to direct payments. If you actually meant direct payments (when used to self direct) we are in complete agreement
@BryonyShannon Are you then open to supporting the Campaign for Real Cares Charter for the Right to Wellbeing as the route to fundamental system change Bryony?
@RobMitch92 Rob - direct payments never were and never could be more than an escape route for the small minority who have what it takes. Do you not agree the real challenge is the system change that removes the need to escape?
Excellent article. This is happening across the UK already. Bristol just exposed it via 'new' policy! The system nationally is resource led, perpetuated by councils unwilling to admit that they calibrate eligibility to fit budgets! Don't believe the standard rhetoric. It's lies.