~We often hear "life is short enjoy it" but forget "eternity is forever prepare for it".....!!!โฃ๏ธ๐คฒ๐ผ
{ Allah there is no deity except Him, the Ever Living, the Sustainer of [all] l existence.}.....โฃ๏ธ๐๐ผ
@Paggy1_ Against Bournemouth we won
Against Brighton you're lying because the Midfield was Bouaddi//Kovacic till Kovacic Got Injured and Against Brighton in the League you lied against Anderson was a 6 not an 8
Against Arsenal You Dumb Fool They had 2 Days in training together
@NguyenThin1928 He did use the Bouaddi//Anderson pivot in the second half against PSG with Nico OโReilly and Enzo as the two 10s and we looked very calm. I do think he was experimenting with something.
(Difference btn Enzo's Chelsea //Enzo's Man city)
Against PSG..!
City first half vs PSG: 3+2 on paper, but unstable midfield protection.
City second half vs PSG: 3+ Bouaddi + Anderson, Enzo higher.
Better protection, balance and attacking freedom.
The natural 6 gives the other two the freedom to play their own game.
The problem is Maresca keeps trying to reinvent the midfield instead of simply balancing the roles.
Itโs not the players. Itโs the structure. Itโs the role allocation.
As risky as it is, it doesn't need a No.6 who leaves his position.
You need someone ready to cover the ground.
Anderson can do that but his aggressive movements often leave too much space to be exploited....!!!
@MoRaD11 Yeah we did. That's exactly why I said it was unstable in the first place.
There was no natural No.6 and no proper rest defence to protect us against PSG's transitions.
@Paggy1_ You Know shit Lemmie Clear with You...!๐ญ๐๐๐๐๐๐
And then If Weakness can be fixed why You so Against Anderson..? And then Anderson is also a passe so what is Your problem