This is a coward's way out. Take responsibility for your own actions Caroline, you are a great footballer, show yourself to be an even better human being.
To play Israel is to give succour to a genocide regime.
@ColonySco SNP are the holding party to keep Scots in UK by accepting Londons supremacist position that Scotland exiting the UK requires Londons permission
The way out is through the international Law via the UN
https://t.co/lim4Mxtbwo
https://t.co/bmQ6FIDzjc
🏴
https://t.co/yr2ulEzNnb
@jc_zam_brano@World_Cup_Guide I've got that too. Excellent.
Here's another good one for tracking progress to the final group positions for you to populate your link:
https://t.co/7GzBhEh8No
YESsers, now is the time to;
1. Leave the SNP.
2. Choose pretty much any other pro-indy organisation.
3. Prepare to coalesce your org under a #ScotlandUnited banner for WM29.
4. Stand candidates on a one-line manifesto: "to Start divorce talks on Monday".
https://t.co/02Fm1oxBCx
Liberation Scotland Update June 2026 #1
from C-24 in Managua, Nicaragua
"Scotland actually has three separate claims to the right of self-determination. And bear in mind, the right of self-determination is only the right to decide. It doesn't mean you're automatically independent, it means you have a right to decide your own future without being contested.
"So the first right of determination consists in the fact that multiple prime ministers, and officials of the British state, have categorically, including Keir Starmer back in 2020, have categorically said that the Scots have a right to decide to go it alone; that they have a right to independence if they want.
"In international law, because the Brits don't have a written constitution, this becomes a constitutional principle, if it has been said long enough and often enough by representatives of the state. Prime Minister speaks on behalf of the state, of course. Like Supreme Court speaks on behalf of the state, they're considered to be state organs.
"So now in international law, Scotland has been established as having that right. When David Cameron agreed to an 'opinion poll' that was called a referendum, he agreed in principle to put a mechanism in place to allow that right. He didn't follow up, he didn't allow the international standards. Nonetheless, that precedent was there. So that's one.
"Number two, the British state claims that it's founded on the Treaty and Act of Union, that's its authority. It said that most recently in its submission to a parliamentary report, published in February this year. The constitutional foundation that means its authority is the Treaty and Act of Union. Well, the Treaty Act of Union, have something called a 'condition precedent'.
"Basically means the union is conditional. What's the condition? It's a hoary old, absolutely irrelevant Act 1706 of the Presbyterian Faith, Preservation of Presbyterian Faith, which lifts the Claim of Right as part what has to be ratified along with the articles of the Union.
"Claim of Right gives the people of Scotland, unequivocally, the right to remove a government that no longer serves the interests of people. Very specific about the violations that caused the government to cease to be legitimate and stop them.
"But it very clearly shows that the sovereignty of the nation of Scotland lies with the Scots, and cannot possibly lie with Westminster. So either, and that condition is there, Claim of Right is still there and we still have that right, or there's no union. There's no British state, because precedent comes before, underpins native conditions. Without it, there's no union. With it, we have the right to leave. That's international law, that's treaty law.
"And finally, the right of self-determination for a people who have been made a dependency, that's a colony, by a larger state is absolutely entrenched. It's a fundamental principle of international law.
"Does that apply to Scotland? Absolutely. The British State has said, Scotland is not a dependency, that's a colony, because we have a partnership with the UK, it's a voluntary partnership. We've all heard that. Voluntary partnership requires an agreement. The agreement is the Treaty and Act Union.
"And hey, guess what? This underpinning authority of the British state has never been given effect. We don't have a treaty, and because we don't have a treaty, in other words, we don't have a partnership agreement, we are not a partner. We can only be a dependency. And that means that under International law, Treaty Law, Scotland has a right to decolonize.
"Not secession, not to fight for a remedy to the way the British state has treated us, a fundamental right to decolonization. And that's what we're doing in Nicaragua, because the vast majority of the international community does not know that Scotland is a dependency.
"It has no idea that the United Kingdom is a fraud. It has no idea that Scotland is not part of a unitary state. Once that has been clearly established, everything changes, the whole game changes.
"So everything hangs, basically, on the ability of British state to hood-wink the international community. And Liberation Scotland is here making sure they can't succeed any longer. And then having that formally recognized, that Scotland has this right to self-determination.
"Once that happens, that doesn't make us independent overnight. What it does do, it clears the path. No more Section 30, no more Westminster permission, no more Westminster interference in the right of Scots to decide their future. It's a way, simply a way to clear the road ahead. And after that, it's up to us." @SSalyers2@LiberationScot@broonpot@PAlanMcMahon@thomsonchris@CraigMurrayOrg@rblackqc@IndyScotParty@LiberateScot@SalvoHighlands@ScotSalvo
I wonder if @PoliceScotland will make a statement to let us know where the missing indyref ringenced money is? They spent a long time looking for it so they can't just walk away & leave us wondering?
Where is it?
@SSalyers2@LornaCa49273324 I don't think the SNP know which funds were embezzled
Reason being. If you add in 'ring fenced' funds to your normal day to day account with all your other finds. Then it becomes impossible to say which was embezzled. Fees/Donations/Short.
So we are literally ALL VICTIMS.
Two legal cases. One at the HRC and one at the ICJ (a lot of work to make those happen but lots already in place so fingers crossed) plus pushing for a C24 inquiry into Scotland’s situation plus a Salvo campaign to begin demanding the rights our own politicians forgot to try to get for us,
BREAKING: Police Scotland are investigating whistleblower claims that a fake company received payments for SNP ‘office refurbishment’ (via @Daily_Record) https://t.co/agzCRWwfAL
Did I just hear at FMQ's that Police Scotland has re-opened the investigation into the ring fenced funds?
All we need now is the new Lord Advocate to re-consider the police file submitted against Nicola Sturgeon.
Justice must be done.
https://t.co/XfIgRlpyUc
This is a much welcome decision.
The Scottish Government has spent years resisting the release of these documents.
The Scottish Information Commissioner deserves great credit for doggedly pursuing the case and standing up for transparency and freedom of information.
https://t.co/livKkMNBCx
Apr 2023: SNP claimed that the Camper Van was bought to be used as a Battle Bus for campaigning. Front page of the Daily Record.
Sturgeon knew this Wales false at the time.
BUT, she waited a full 3 years before telling anybody that in fact she knew nothing about it.
REALLY????