@AlteroJonson@BajaBlastLuxio If you are a furry in general, then the average person will already question if you are a zoo or not. Star fox isn’t exactly human
@thatPetitePanda Anyone outside the furry community will not be able to make a distinction, you are already associated if you are a furry. Every community has a small part that are bad eggs, people who owns knotted dildos or has character designs with it aren’t necessarily zoos. It can be nuanced
@FailedVessel67 I don’t particularly care about animal like genitalia that much, but if I persecute it then it would be equivalent to the type of thinking that spawned the LBG without the T movement
It’s equivalency, you can’t have both, either all furries are zoos or they are not
@FailedVessel67 Wanting to fuck a furry is the same as wanting to fuck a 300 year old loli because it’s technically “legal”
Now what?
If we make an arbitrary choice to exclude certain things then this is back on the table
@FailedVessel67 Literally every single fetish has a version of this, like for example age gap is much more problematic if there’s too big of a power imbalance or when the older person is the one who went after the younger person. Seems like avoiding a company is a lot simpler than other fetishes
@spling48280@FailedVessel67 You seem to misunderstand, this is a devil’s advocate argument to show that saying “furry characters with animal looking dicks are zoophillic” is not nuanced enough as an argument against zoophillia nor specific enough
@onihori_@FailedVessel67 Here’s another thing, any animal parts on a humanoid form is already considered furry, I don’t see why it would stop at the genitals. Because you could make the argument that any of the other animal parts are zoophillic
@onihori_@FailedVessel67 How about in cases where they are neither animal like nor human like? Or when the genitals has a blend of both human and animal features?