THE BIG FOUR’S COLORADO BLUEPRINT: How Four Wealthy Donors Flipped a Red State (and Artificially Accelerated Transgender and Gender Identity Policies Through Massive Funding, Not Grassroots Momentum)
Picture Colorado in the summer of 2004: a solidly Republican state where the GOP controlled the governor’s mansion, both legislative chambers, most congressional seats, and key statewide offices. Four wealthy Democrats: Tim Gill, Pat Stryker, Jared Polis, and Rutt Bridges, gathered quietly and launched what they called “The Blueprint.” It wasn’t a spontaneous uprising of everyday voters but a calculated, venture capital-style operation funded by their personal fortunes. As detailed in the 2010 book 'The Blueprint' by Adam Schrager and former Republican legislator Rob Witwer, the 2014 documentary 'Rocky Mountain Heist', and Jennifer Bilek’s 2020 First Things article “The Billionaires Behind the LGBT Movement,” this effort first seized political power for the Democrats in recent times in Colorado. Then it built a sophisticated funding machine that critics say unnaturally and artificially propelled transgender and gender identity policies forward: not through broad, organic grassroots support from ordinary people, but through coordinated billions from a handful of ultra-wealthy donors operating largely out of public view.
What started as targeted electoral spending evolved into a top-down philanthropy network that amplified “gender identity ideology” globally and in Colorado law. Early gay rights efforts had roots in small, community-driven groups facing real stigma. After gay marriage become legal, the push for transgender policies appeared to be a natural next step - but it was heavily engineered by elite money, secretive strategy sessions, and international channels. The result? Rapid policy changes that many feel outpaced public consensus.
The Gang of Four and the 2004 Electoral “Heist”
The group, nicknamed the “Gang of Four” or “Four Horsemen", bypassed traditional party structures by forming the Colorado Democracy Alliance. They funneled millions through 527 independent-expenditure groups, voter-turnout operations, and aligned nonprofits, treating politics like a startup investment.
- Tim Gill, Quark software founder, sold his stake in 1999 for about $500 million. Motivated by Colorado’s 1992 Amendment 2 (an anti-gay measure later overturned), he endowed the Gill Foundation with roughly $200 million (inflation-adjusted) for LGBT causes. It has since granted hundreds of millions more to the transgender cause.
- Pat Stryker, medical-device heiress to Stryker Corporation, channeled funds through her Bohemian Foundation.
- Jared Polis, openly gay ProFlowers entrepreneur (now Colorado’s governor since 2019), and Rutt Bridges, software & petroleum entrepreneur, completed this quartet.
In 2004, their donations overwhelmed Republicans: Stryker spending over $850,000, Gill nearly $775,000, Polis and Bridges over $400,000 each. Of $3.6 million in 527 organizations spending, nearly two-thirds came from these four. Democrats flipped both legislative chambers, for the first time in decades. By 2006, they added the governorship and more seats. Total early spending exceeded $20 million, locking in a Democratic “trifecta” that has endured for two decades.
'The Blueprint' explains the mechanics in plain terms: dubiously-funded nonprofits, targeted ads, and ground games that caught the GOP flat-footed. The 'Rocky Mountain Heist' documentary calls it a “heist” by a “shadowy cabal,” visualizing a “blue blob” spreading from Colorado as a warning of national replication.
The Funding Pipeline: From Electoral Power to LGBT Philanthropy
Bilek’s article ties this political takeover directly to LGBT advocacy. Gill and Pat Stryker, with the two other wealthy philanthropists used “ruthless political strategies” to turn Colorado blue while directing roughly half a billion dollars into groups advancing LGBT agendas. Gill introduced Pat’s brother Jon Stryker (openly gay man) at the 2015 GLSEN Respect Awards, recalling how they had “plotted, schemed, hiked and skied together” while “punishing the wicked and rewarding the good.”
Jon Stryker founded the Arcus Foundation in 2000. It poured $58.4 million into LGBT programs from 2007–2010 alone; with Jon personally giving over $30 million from Stryker stock. The family company, started by their grandfather, hit $25.1 billion in annual revenue in 2025 (up 11.2% from 2024), with deep roots in surgical supplies and medical tech. Bilek highlights this medical industry backdrop as relevant context for the scale of later funding priorities.
The Artificial Pivot from Gay Rights to Transgender and Gender Identity Push
Here is where the “not grassroots” reality becomes clearest. Early gay-rights activism grew organically from small communities facing discrimination. But after same-sex marriage victories, the focus shifted dramatically to transgender issues and gender identity ideology. Bilek documents how Arcus and Gill networks built on the Colorado donors’ infrastructure artificially accelerated this through top-down philanthropy, not widespread public demand or bottom-up organizing.
In 2008, Arcus hosted a key meeting in Bellagio, Italy, with 29 international leaders (including Jon Stryker). Michael O’Flaherty (rapporteur for the 2006 Yogyakarta Principles, which applied international human rights law to sexual orientation and gender identity) attended. Bilek notes the Principles “planted the seeds to bring in and attach gender-identity ideology to our legal structures.” O’Flaherty, a former UN Human Rights Committee member, is now Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, in office at his new job since April 2024, based in Strasbourg.
From Bellagio emerged the LGBT Movement Advancement Project (MAP) to coordinate advocacy on gender identity in law, education, and culture. The LGBTI Core Group, an informal UN-linked network of member states (including the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, and the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights) formed with Arcus-funded participants like OutRight Action International. Arcus also backed the U.N with funding, alongside Amnesty International and GLSEN. Grants targeted Transgender Europe, ILGA, the Transgender Law Center, ACLU, Center for American Progress, and the 2015 Global Trans Initiative (at least $20 million committed and surpassed). These programs trained activists in “political activism, leadership, transgender law, religious liberty, education, and civil rights.”
The pattern is clear: This is not a natural evolution driven by everyday people. It is a billionaire-orchestrated infrastructure with half a billion spent in Colorado alone, plus hundreds of millions more donated strategically globally from Arcus and Gill, that manufactured rapid cultural and policy acceptance. Public perception framed it as organic “progress,” as meant, but the funding records, donor quotes, and coordinated meetings reveal a top-down strategy using wealth to bypass traditional grassroots organizing.
Colorado as the Proof: Policies Under Governor Polis
With the political safe haven secured, one of the original Four, Jared Polis, became governor in 2019. The Democratic trifecta delivered swift transgender policies:
- 2019 (Jude’s Law / HB 19-1039): Simplified gender marker changes on birth certificates (M/F/X) with no surgery, doctor’s note, or court order required; banned conversion therapy for minors.
- 2025 (Kelly Loving Act / HB 25-1312): Signed by Polis on May 16, 2025 (effective October 1, 2026), it expands anti-discrimination laws to treat intentional deadnaming or misgendering as discriminatory in workplaces, schools, and public settings; eases name/gender document changes.
- Early 2026: Bills advanced to seal minors’ name-change records for privacy.
These built directly on the donor-funded base. What feels unnatural to many was how quickly policies advanced once the money secured the levers of power. It also bring up the ethics and moral foundation of a governor like Jared Polis, who seems to have funded himself to immense power with false equivalence to an organically elected official.
The Deceit Debate: Manufactured Momentum vs. True Civil Rights
Trans rights activists call the moves of the Big Four savvy advocacy for equality. Opponents argue they are inherently deceptive. The trans/gender identity movement publicly appears as grassroots civil rights evolution. In reality, it seems driven by a tiny circle of billionaires using secretive roundtables, dark money, and philanthropy to scale ideology (including UN human rights channels), like they manipulated Colorado’s politics. The half-billion-dollar figure, Gill’s “plotted and schemed” quote, Arcus’s medical-fortune ties, and the Bellagio-to-UN pipeline all point to manufactured momentum rather than broad societal demand. Colorado served as the perfect laboratory before national and global export.
The Legacy of Deceit:
Two decades on, Colorado remains Democratic-controlled. The model inspired donor networks elsewhere. Gill and Arcus foundations continue granting millions annually. U.S. LGBTQ philanthropy totaled $209.4 million in 2023, with trans-specific funding still prominent. Polis is still governor of colarado, though his term ends in November 2026 and cannot be elected again. Whether you see the Big Four as visionary or elite operators, their 2004 effort of electoral flip plus sustained, targeted use of millions of dollars, clearly and unnaturally accelerated transgender and gender identity policies far beyond what organic grassroots movements alone could have achieved. It remains a case study in how concentrated wealth can reshape law, culture, and international norms. The question is, what are you going to do about it? Stay silent as the transgender industry and those standing to profit sway policy, or righteously fight the power?
REFERENCES (verified as of April 2026)
1. Schrager, Adam, and Rob Witwer - The Blueprint* (2010).
2. Rocky Mountain Heist (2014).
3. Bilek, Jennifer @bjportraits: “The Billionaires Behind the LGBT Movement.” published in First Things, January 21, 2020.
4. Arcus Foundation grant records and Global Trans Initiative updates (2007–2025).
5. Stryker Corporation 2025 revenue annual results
6. Colorado legislative records: Jude’s Law (2019); Kelly Loving Act (HB 25-1312, signed May 2025)
7. Council of Europe: Michael O’Flaherty Commissioner records and 2026 activities.
8. Gill Foundation and LGBTQ funders tracking reports (2023–2025).
All details cross-checked against public records, foundation filings, legislative histories, and recent reporting for accuracy.
#Colorado #Politics #Policy #BigFour #FourHorsemen #ethics #JaredPolis #VOTE #Republican #Democrat #ballot #elections
Women who won't accept men can be women are apparently the real "men of women"... gender ideology is so ridiculous and misogynistic at its core with its aims of dismantling any and all protections for women and girls through intensive repetitive propaganda and gaslighting. It is truly unsettling seeing many physicians pretend "gender-affirming healthcare" is in anyway ethical or sound evidence-based medicine. We have created a real public health problem. #MedTwitter #medx
A MtF “transwoman” posted this recently on the “women” subreddit:
“Cis women must realize that they hold privilege over trans women, and that frequently they are oppressors to trans women. They must realize that they dish out patriarchal violence against trans women.”
“You have made me lose faith in sisterhood and solidarity amidst a shared struggle. Cis women can truly be the men of women … Just as bad as them.”
And also,
“No, I am not biologically male and no, I was not socialized male. Both of these are TERF dogwhistles.”
🤡
NEW EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE FROM DENVER, COLORADO... CATCHING CAMPAIGN SIGN THIEF!
Make Public Shaming Great Again!
And Stop TRANSING the kids!
Yes on 133, 134 and 135 Colorado.
@RealAmVoice@ProtectKidsCO@LoriGim@Erin4Parents
I can't emphasize this enough. It is reading the actual legal pleadings, scientific publications, training modules, and pedagogical materials on gender identity that make it crystal clear that absolutely none of it can possibly be true. Anyone who engages with them in good faith, including those who are good faith believers to start will reach the only conclusion a rational can reach about them: they are nonsense on stilts. Anyone who reaches a contrary conclusion is fundamentally corrupt. There is no clean or decent way to conclude otherwise.
What are the odds that all three people in a nuclear family are "trans"? And if you can switch your "gender identity" as casually as changing clothes, why should it be a factor in society? Sex matters at a fundamental, physical and human level. Whether you like to wear your hair shorter or clothes colored pink, in a liberal society, shouldn't matter at all.
Straight wife and mother. Lesbian. Non-binary. Trans man. Polyamorous. And, as of last month, two-spirit.
Each new identity Rowan Jetté Knox announced was treated by Canadian media as a profound and final truth. @preta_6 asks why nobody noticed the contradictions.
https://t.co/8fy2abUbAj
Opposition claims mandatory life sentences "won't deter" child sex traffickers.
Here is the undeniable truth: A trafficker serving LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE cannot hurt another child.
🛑 Under current law, perpetrators face 8 to 48 years plus parole. Prop 133 reclassifies child sex trafficking as a Class 1 felony—ensuring perpetrators are permanently removed from our communities.
Make the punishment fit the crime.
🛑 Vote YES on PROP 133
Same in Colorado. We all understand the trans industry is extremely powerful, but the sheer length and breadth of the deceptive tactics trans industry activists and captured media engage in, are nothing like the world has seen yet. The lies keep mounting, but hopefully more people keep waking up to the house of cards that is gender ideology.
I am convinced @seattletimes reporters have been given a command to lie about the initiative to protect girls’ sports. They published an unchallenged quote from a “doctor” who said there is no proof boys have a physical advantage over girls. So how do you explain a runner going from 76th ranked to 2nd ranked IN THE SAME MONTH after switching to the girls’ team? Absolute morons.
Check out the complete and outrageous gaslighting. A "yes" vote on Prop 133 supports requiring life in prison for people found guilty of child sex trafficking. Why would a victim of child sex trafficking be against punishing a child sex trafficker? And why would that change how we, as a society, view these criminals? What's in it for you that you want literal child rapists and enablers to have light sentences? Disturbing. Vote YES! on Prop 133 #Colorado! Keep the kids safe! #COpolitics
If you are filling out your ballot tonight and looking at Prop 133 (Human Trafficking), it is important to know that victim advocates, anti-trafficking groups, and child advocacy centers are opposed to it ...
Why would a victim of child sex trafficking be against punishing a child sex trafficker? And why would that change how we, as a society, view these criminals? What's in it for you that you want literal child rapists and enablers to have light sentences? Disturbing. Vote YES! on Prop 133 #Colorado! Keep the kids safe! #COpolitics
Mountain Minute for 10/28: Who's funding the campaign against Colorado's Propositions 134 and 135? An original RMV investigation examines more than $3.2 million in contributions, with 88% reportedly coming from just 11 major donors.
Plus: a Colorado Civil Rights Division audit, a surprise endorsement in Denver's congressional race, Ken Salazar's opposition to Amendment 87, and more.
Friendly reminder: Cutting the healthy breasts off vulnerable young girls is not healthcare.
This is what they’re selling as the civil rights issue of our time and labeling “life-saving.”
We should be protecting vulnerable girls, not removing healthy parts of their bodies.
INSANE. The school board for @JeffcoSchoolsCo DOUBLES DOWN on their radical transgender policies - will continue to allow males to invade female sports and locker rooms.
Jeffco Schools is already facing an investigation and is in a legal battle with the Dept. of Education
Just defund them already!
They’re absolutely insane and desperate to push gender ideology propaganda onto kids
In Colorado, society sets common-sense age thresholds for major life decisions, from signing a legal contract to getting a tattoo. 📜✍️
Proposition 135 establishes a consistent standard: requiring minors to reach full legal adulthood at age 18 before making permanent, irreversible sex-change surgical alterations.
Give young people the time and space they need to grow!
🛑 Vote YES on PROP 135
The DOJ is suing the Anne Arundel County, Maryland school board, saying district rules let staff use a child's new name and pronouns without telling the parents, then withheld the records.
The complaint says that on Dec. 10, 2025, parents got a staff email that called their daughter by a male name. A second email tried to recall it, a third used her legal name, and a fourth said the first had gone "to the wrong addresses."
When the parents pressed, the complaint says, the staff member admitted lying. The staff member said their daughter had asked for the male name.
The parents told the school to use only her legal name. The complaint says that on May 1, 2026, a field trip roster went to every parent on the trip. It listed the male name next to the Does' surname. The staff member first blamed another student with the same last name, then admitted there wasn't one.
The parents asked for records. The complaint says the principal offered an appointment to see some, but said "internal emails, personal notes, or other staff communications would require appropriate legal process, including a subpoena where applicable."
https://t.co/F5AByXN6Zj
I mean, if you lie to people that they were "born in the wrong body" and need "sex change", you can endlessly charge the taxpayer for any number of surgeries and a lifelong supply of cross-sex synthetic hormones. Insurance rates will go up so people can indulge in free (to them) cosmetic surgeries. Why do you think Jared Polis and Phil Weiser go so hard for the trans industry? 💰💲🤑
- USMI