@GuxBurgh@NHL@penguins Then why not just say that in the official ruling? It would have been an easier explanation. They ruled the stick touching the puck legal
@GuxBurgh@NHL@penguins Again, that rule wasn’t part of the ruling. Everything was deemed legal with him touching the puck with his stick. They said the part where it went off his body after that was illegal, which I don’t agree with. Did you read the ruling?
@dmach87 Nice buzzwords phag. Let me guess, you’re a Trump supporter? Keep showing how fucking stupid you are. Sharks fans have been around for decades prior to Macklin being here. You’re acting like every fan base doesnt yell refs you suck on something they don’t like. It’s not that deep
@GuxBurgh@NHL@penguins Are you new? Read the ruling. He touched the puck with his stick below his shoulders, which is legal, at which point was not part of the shot (where he can’t touch it above the crossbar). That’s why the ruling didn’t mention it. They said he batted the puck in which was not true
@GuxBurgh@NHL@penguins It wasn’t a high stick and that’s not what the ruling was based off of. They said he batted the puck into to the net that wasn’t his stick. That was not true. It glanced off his body. Any other situation, that goal counts.
@dmach87 Well, clearly they were around or else he’d be just another player on the ice. I think the booing is dumb but part of it was him holding the puck behind the net.