@NizNellie3 What makes you think they are Chinese nationals as opposed to American of ethnic Chinese heritage? Or those of other ethnic heritage, say Koreans?
@JeffreyLax They are basing this on a folk memory from when medieval universities *were* semi-sovereign bodies exempt from secular laws (Toswell 2017).
https://t.co/lKuY3z93k3
@ColumbiaSpec (🧵 8/8) Your move, @ColumbiaSpec.
Correct long-running factual misrepresentations that took a legal opinion from Sullivan & Cromwell @sullcrom costing tens of thousands of dollars to state the obvious and debunk, or continue peddling misinformation?
https://t.co/HMeuXGyACO
(🧵 1/8) The @ColumbiaSpec has finally confirmed what is obvious to anyone with a basic understanding of corporate law.
The University Senate's imaginative "three branches" theory of shared governance is illegitimate (and flat-out false) overreach.
https://t.co/f5G0I9zAmY
@ColumbiaSpec (🧵 7/8) For the record, we agree with much of the substantive views advanced.
We simply disagree with presenting flat-out lies as fact, and declining to correct the record or add appropriate context when notified.
@Columbia@sullcrom@CUSenate@ColumbiaSpec@j34bsrisbd6f@jrslaugh ADDENDUM: It has since been pointed out to us that the Senate’s “Sundial Report” (cited above) has in fact been thoroughly discredited with hundreds of documented errors:
https://t.co/U4iSX7CkIj
Yesterday, @Columbia just released its Senate Review Committee Report.
Most coverage will focus on the recommendations. The bombshell is buried in Appendix R: a Sullivan & Cromwell @sullcrom legal opinion.
What it says, and why it matters. (🧵 1/20)
https://t.co/HMeuXGyACO
@Columbia@sullcrom@CUSenate@ColumbiaSpec@j34bsrisbd6f@jrslaugh (🧵 20/20) What is at issue is the assertion of these preferences AS *FACTS* about @Columbia's existing governance. Charter, Statutes, NY law, and counsel all say otherwise.
Go ahead and argue for what governance *should* be.
You are not entitled to misrepresent what it *is*.