The most delusional segment of disney star wars fandom are the last jedi fans, and by extension sequel fans in general.
They just cant accept the movie (and its trilogy) is the most horrendous piece of shit rivaling only dragonball evolution in bad story execution.
Begins had an aura to it as a Batman film that The Dark Knight and Rises just didn’t.
Begins felt like the only film in the trilogy where Nolan actually wanted to make a Batman movie
Rhetorically Defective is a coward and based on his histrionic meltdown, he just lost a fan. I know you'll see this too Ardy, prepare for the spiral that is the Groyper Curse.
If artists won’t carve stone any more because they would rather glue dildos together and display at LACMA, Ai will carve the stone. There are worse things than Ai making art.
George Lucas's soft racism and horniness is the special magic of the original Star Wars. Only mild bigotry is displayed, and it's the soft Boomer racism of thinking you're being progressive while just oddly detailed but superficial stereotype tokens in your films.
For all the people constantly defending the destruction of one of the worlds biggest brands, it's probably time to hang it up.
When a Star Wars film gets passed opening week by a movie made for 750k... It's dead. The brand is dead.
Good job Kathleen Kennedy & Friends.
@Rhetordead Bro you had a non-livestream edited video where you praised Vrillium's work THAT YOU THEN DELETED.
Seriously, have you been Groyper Cursed? Because I didn't do it.
The massive failure of Mando and Grogu should tell them either it's time to start over with a new team or it's time to just put Star Wars on a shelf for now. But it's Disney, so expect more slop.
It's stunning how widespread this lie is.
The Death Star was always going to destroy the Yavin base. It's literally in the fucking screenplay you know; the blueprint directors base their movies on?
Do the barest minimum of research before posting misinformation online.
I know some people are never going to be okay with it, but Lucas simply liked this scene (sans the performance of the original Jabba actor), and he wanted to establish Han and Jabba's relationship as part of a subplot that would develop across the next two films (sorry, he didn't care about a Big Jabba Reveal). These are his openly stated reasons for restoring the scene.
In order for the scene to be restored, Han simply *has* to step on Jabba's tail (all proposed alternatives are either even sillier or unworkable editorially). The question is: can you sell it? Because it is a little outrageous.
I think the animators do a good job in the final version, because they actually integrate it into the core dynamic of the scene. Han (obviously) pisses off Jabba by stepping on his tail; if you notice, Han has, in fact, been deliberately provoking Jabba this entire time, because he's actually calling his bluff and daring Jabba to kill him right then and there, gambling that he won't actually do it, which will then force Jabba to negotiate.
Jabba, as you would expect, gets very mad, clenches his fist, and looks like he probably *is* about to kill Han. But then Han immediately starts sweet-talking him and even offers to pay Jabba back, "plus a little extra." Jabba then relaxes with an "Oh Han, you impudent scamp" look on his face and decides to play ball, because Han is "[his] boy" and "[he's] the best." If Jabba can't bring himself to kill Han now, Jabba has to acknowledge to himself that he doesn't actually want to kill him, and so he'll stop waffling on the issue by sending bounty hunters with deliberately ambiguous instructions, and he'll negotiate. So Han's ploy worked.
Of course, in order to accept all this, you have to grant that it's a good character scene (despite its partial redundancy) that's worth restoring in the first place. For various reasons, that is something that many people are radically against accepting. But if you start with the premise that it's a good scene, Han stepping on Jabba's tail is not that hard to justify. It is, in fact, part of establishing what Han and Jabba's relationship actually is at this point in time. It is not necessarily the same as it is in Return of the Jedi. Actually, it is obviously quite different. I don't think that is obviously a bad thing. I'm not sure what the point of including the scene would be if their relationship were portrayed as exactly the same.