Qué risa con Blu Radio que invitó a un experto en fracking para luego ponerse a pelar con él porque no les gustó su opinión técnica en la que les explicó muy claramente POR QUÉ NO HAY FORMA DE HACER FRACKING SOSTENIBLE.
Aquí se las guardé: https://t.co/ACHNA0I4o1
Tus dos respuestas confirman el argumento, no lo tumban. Que pueda ser juzgado por traición después significa que el conflicto ya ocurrió y Colombia ya fue dañada. La incompatibilidad funcional busca precisamente evitar llegar a ese punto. Y nadie discute que sigue siendo colombiano, ese nunca fue el argumento.
La empresa que produce y vende los licores del candidato presidencial @ABDELAESPRIELLA acumula pérdidas por casi 4 mil millones de pesos.
En Estados Unidos había proyectado ventas por 4 millones de dólares, pero logró apenas el 7% y cerró operación.
https://t.co/iXgSt6vn5M
🚨 ÚLTIMA HORA | Un grupo de 20 exmagistrados de altas cortes y reconocidos constitucionalistas acaba de emitir un comunicado en el que sostiene que la nacionalidad estadounidense de @ABDELAESPRIELLA sería incompatible con el ejercicio de la Presidencia de Colombia (1/2)
what is agent looping
for the last two years we prompted agents one task at a time. that is starting to change
instead of asking an agent to build the landing page and then driving every step yourself, you set up a loop that handles discovery, planning, the work, checking, and iterating until the goal is met
looping is a setup you build. almost any agent harness can run it, it just depends on how you wire it up
at its simplest, looping is one agent working on itself:
> researches
> drafts
> checks the draft against a goal
> fixes what is weak
> runs that cycle again until the work clears the requirements
you are not prompting each step anymore. the agent repeats the cycle for you
the bigger version is a fleet looping. you give an orchestrator agent a goal, it breaks the goal into pieces, hands each piece to a specialist agent, and those specialists hand smaller jobs to their own subagents
the whole tree keeps looping through discovery, planning, execution, and verification until the goal is met
one agent looping is like a person redoing their own draft. a fleet looping is a whole team running a project end-to-end
you create a goal, and the system runs the loop until it finishes within the reqs you set
open and closed looping:
OPEN LOOPING is exploratory. it still has conditions and a goal, but you give the agent or the fleet a wide space to move in. it can try different paths, discover things, build something you did not fully spec out
this is the exciting end, it is what Peter and others are doing, and tbh it is where I want to spend more time
the catch is cost, an open loop with real room to explore burns an insane amount of tokens. for the 90 percent of people without an unlimited budget it is not runnable yet, and pointed at projects with a loose standard it turns into a slop machine
CLOSED LOOPING is bounded. a human designs the end-to-end path first:
> clear goal
> defined steps
> an eval at each step
> a point where it stops or hands back to you (and feeds back performance data)
the agents still loop, but inside framework you built. it gets better every run because each pass feeds the next, and it runs on a normal budget because the path is tight.
for most marketing work, closed is the one that pays off today.
> the orchestrator owns the goal
> the specialists own the steps
> the subagents do the narrow work
> an eval gate make sure its not slop
"Ahora que estoy sentado junto a usted y que hablo con usted me aterra pensar en el futuro, porque el futuro es otra vez la soledad, esta vida rutinaria e inútil. ¿Y ya con qué voy a soñar, cuando he sido tan feliz despierto?"
"Noches blancas", Fiodor Dostoyevski
Claude Code's creator said something that stopped me cold:
"I don't prompt Claude anymore. I write loops — and the loops do the work. My job is to write loops."
Most developers are still crafting the perfect prompt.
The person who built the tool moved past prompting entirely.
In 30 minutes Boris reveals his actual daily Claude Code setup.
Claude Code + loops + dynamic workflows.
Worth more than any $500 vibe-coding course.
Watch it.
Then read this - everything you need to know about loops to actually apply what he says ↓
Bookmark both. This is your weekend.
A todos los candidatos se nos ocurrió la idea de usar los símbolos nacionales: la patria, la bandera, el tricolor, en nuestros logos. Pero todos sabíamos que eso está prohibido por la Ley.
El defensor de la mafia fue el único que la violó, como siempre.
Pero los Simpson les tienen otras ideas que podrían usar….si no se tumban los derechos de autor, como se tumban a los mafiosongos que representan.
Claude Fable 5 changed how we work on the Claude Code team day to day.
We used to verify that Claude did the work right. Now we verify that it's doing the right work.
Here’s the 3 biggest changes:
Nassim Taleb: the bigger something gets, the more fragile it becomes.
Jump off a 1-meter ledge ten times - you're fine. Jump 10 meters once - you're dead.
Size works the same way. One giant bank dumping €50B moved the market 12% and lost billions. Ten small banks dumping €5B each would've lost almost nothing.
"An elephant breaks a leg when it falls. A mouse doesn't."
"The best predictor of a company's bankruptcy is steady earnings."
"Don't cross a river that's on average four feet deep."
~40 min, free. why small, jagged and distributed outlives big, smooth and centralized ↓