"London: it's gone... Paris: gone... Berlin: gone."
As foreigner-led riots ravage European cities, journalist Tommy Robinson sounds the alarm on far-left ideology joining forces with violent Islamic extremism. @TRobinsonNewEra@RobFinnertyUSA
Dr Bonnie Henry claimed the covid vaccine was safe for unborn babies when their pregnant mothers get vaccinated. She should be in prison.
https://t.co/wuG6MbpE5a
The Muslim religion is the fastest-growing religion per capita in the United States, especially among minority races.
Last month I attended a training. During the training session, three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant, and Muslim faiths each presented their beliefs.
I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Muslim gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video.
After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers. When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Muslim and asked:
'Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'
There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, “Nonbelievers"
I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'
The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.'
He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'
I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine the Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same to guarantee them a place in heaven!'
The Muslim was speechless.
I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me! Let me ask you a question:
Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'
You could have heard a pin drop.
Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam, and exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.
In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the US to elect the President.
I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized unless each of us sends it on! This is your chance to make a difference.
🚨 WOW. This brave Christian migrant from Iran walked up and WENT BERSERK on the proposed Islamic Center in McKinney, TX — straight to the council's face
The whole building ERUPTED after his dire warning:
"I'm a Sharia law survivor from Iran."
"I'm TELLING YOU, this is a BAD idea and you're going to REGRET not listening to people like us who lived under Sharia law!"
"I'm here to tell you this is a DANGEROUS ideology you're allowing in your country. Every country that is Islamic now, it used to be a Christian country and we were soft Christians."
"And we allowed these people to come in, bring their Sharia law into our countries and slowly k*ll us off left and right!"
"Let me make it very clear to you. Christianity is a personal relationship with God...Islam is Sharia law. Religion and state, which is not even compatible with the American thing and when these people will lie to you, to manipulate you."
"Because whenever Islam is little, they will lie to you and tell you they come in peace. This is level one!"
"Level two is what's happening in UK right now, where you have two-tier policing, where you have the blasphemy laws, Islamophobia, racism, all this nonsense that they talk about."
"Any time you criticize Islam, they will use the race card, but every country has this disgusting ideology inside their country, including my own country, Iran, Russia, Islamophobia is another made up bullsh*t because they don't want you to criticize their death cult!"
"If you question that disgusting book, they're get k*lled over it, just like my friends were apostates imprisoned or dead right now in Iran!"
HE NAILED IT!!!
Several non-Alberta premiers now want to use Alberta’s energy resources as leverage in negotiations with the United States.
Think about what that admission means.
They believe Alberta oil is powerful enough to help preserve provincial economies that depend heavily on U.S. trade. But that same energy card will be far more powerful when Alberta itself holds it during separation negotiations.
Ontario, Quebec and B.C. need Alberta energy to move goods, fuel vehicles and aircraft, heat buildings and keep their economies running. Alberta, by contrast, sells the overwhelming majority of its exports directly to the United States and global markets—not to the other provinces.
If Alberta energy is a powerful card for Canada against Washington, imagine its strength when Alberta places it on the table in negotiations with Canada. https://t.co/70SdJ6Dt1R
The pipeline announcement is being sold as a victory.
But look closer.
Ottawa keeps control. B.C. gets paid. Taxpayers take on debt. Producers face higher costs. Alberta waits for permission.
That is not a victory.
That is a bad deal.
Vote Option 2. Alberta can do better.
You think President Trump's new 50% tariffs is about a dispute with Canada? Think again.
Canadian PM Mark Carney isn't defending Canada — he's the globalist's point man against Trump, & he's staffing Ottawa with globalist & Crown operatives.
@sjkokinda with the breakdown.
CANADA SUPPORTS SELF-DETERMINATION—UNTIL IT HAPPENS INSIDE CANADA
Over the last 50 years, people around the world have voted in referendums to leave an existing country and establish a sovereign state:
🇩🇯 1977 — Djibouti
Separated from France
🇸🇮 1990 — Slovenia
Separated from Yugoslavia
🇱🇹 1991 — Lithuania
Restored independence from the Soviet Union
🇪🇪 1991 — Estonia
Restored independence from the Soviet Union
🇱🇻 1991 — Latvia
Restored independence from the Soviet Union
🇬🇪 1991 — Georgia
Separated from the Soviet Union
🇭🇷 1991 — Croatia
Separated from Yugoslavia
🇲🇰 1991 — North Macedonia
Separated from Yugoslavia
🇦🇲 1991 — Armenia
Separated from the Soviet Union
🇹🇲 1991 — Turkmenistan
Separated from the Soviet Union
🇺🇦 1991 — Ukraine
Separated from the Soviet Union
🇦🇿 1991 — Azerbaijan
Confirmed its independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union
🇺🇿 1991 — Uzbekistan
Confirmed its independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union
🇧🇦 1992 — Bosnia and Herzegovina
Separated from Yugoslavia
🇪🇷 1993 — Eritrea
Separated from Ethiopia
🇹🇱 1999 — Timor-Leste
Voted to reject continued rule by Indonesia and became independent in 2002
🇲🇪 2006 — Montenegro
Separated from Serbia and Montenegro
🇸🇸 2011 — South Sudan
Separated from Sudan
Canada ultimately recognized every one of these countries as a sovereign state. In many cases, Canada established diplomatic relations, provided assistance and supported the new country’s development.
Canada did not refuse to recognize them because they were too small.
Canada did not tell them they could never establish institutions, negotiate trade agreements, operate a government or participate in the international community.
Canada did not make recognition conditional on proving that independence would be effortless, risk-free or immediately profitable.
Their people made a democratic choice and Canada accepted the resulting countries.
But when the same question is raised inside Canada, the language suddenly changes.
🇨🇦 Quebec, 1980
More than 1.48 million Quebecers voted for a mandate to negotiate sovereignty-association. Canadians and federal political leaders mobilized to preserve Canada, and the proposal was defeated.
🇨🇦 Quebec, 1995
More than 2.3 million Quebecers voted for sovereignty.
Once again, Quebecers were warned about money, trade, investment, currency, pensions and whether Quebec could afford to become a country.
🇨🇦 Alberta, 2026
Albertans are not being asked to immediately declare independence on October 19th.
They are being asked whether Alberta should remain a province or whether the Alberta government should begin the legal process required to hold a future binding referendum on separation.
It is a vote about whether Albertans should be allowed to take the next democratic step.
Yet many Canadians are already saying Alberta could never afford independence, could never build a country and should not even seriously consider sovereignty.
That exposes a remarkable double standard:
When people overseas seek sovereignty, it is called self-determination.
When Quebecers seek sovereignty, it is called a threat to national unity.
When Albertans seek a democratic vote, it is called reckless, divisive or impossible.
The new countries on this list did not all begin wealthy, stable or free from uncertainty. Independence required difficult negotiations, institution-building and major decisions about trade, borders, laws, currency and international relations.
But they created sovereign countries.
Quebec and Alberta are repeatedly told they could not afford to become countries.
Yet Canada recognizes countries around the world that began with fewer resources, weaker institutions and far greater obstacles.
The honest position should be consistent:
Either people have the democratic right to consider and pursue sovereignty—or they do not.
That principle should not disappear simply because the people seeking the vote happen to live inside Canada.
B.C. wants an annual royalty from Alberta oil moving through its province.
Meanwhile, roughly 900,000 containers from B.C.’s ports cross Alberta every year on their way east.
Canada cannot operate on the principle that B.C.’s geography has value—but Alberta’s does not.
Reciprocity is only fair. Alberta can do better.
The Liberal Party needs Alberta to stay in Canada so it can continue funding Ottawa's reckless spending.
The Conservative Party needs Alberta to stay because we are their pathway to forming government.
Neither is fighting for Alberta's interests. They're fighting for their own.
And when you ask them one simple question:
What tangible benefit does Alberta receive by remaining in Canada? they never have an answer.
Instead, we get the same empty slogans.
"Unity."
"We're stronger together."
"Canada is better together."
Those aren't benefits. They're talking points.
The reality is the clearest beneficiaries of Alberta remaining in Canada are the rest of Canada and Canada's political elite, not Albertans.
@JimMininger@MakisMedicine Seems pointless doesn’t it as it doesn’t sound like it did anything that the rchop alone would have. When can we hear about people who got there without the chemo? That’s what I’m looking for
@ABDanielleSmith I agree with @brianlilley "The board clearly knew that putting out this list would create a publicity headache for Smith and her government. They knew that most media would be too lazy or too biased to tell the whole story."
As a Canadian who travelled from Alberta to Ottawa as a part of the convoy I can 100% say that neither Lich nor Barber had anything to do with my decision to be a part of this historical movement nor were they the reason I stayed in Ottawa for almost a week. I joined this movement because being mandated to take a drug against my will to be able to simply live life freely went against everything I believed in. It’s simply shocking to me that 2 people are somehow being held responsible for thousands who willingly and on their own volition and expense went to the capital city of our country to protest what the government was doing to us.
The blame should be placed where it belongs. Solely on the Trudeau government and not on 2 Canadian citizens who were the face of thousands of other Canadians who simply wanted to be heard! Lich nor Barber caused this protest. It was Trudeau and his 100% unscientific mandates that caused this protest. It was the Ottawa police who told us where to park our trucks and not Lich and Barber. It wasn’t Lich nor Barber who shut down businesses, it was the city who shut down businesses and those businesses who refused to shut down and chose to stay open and make money for the first time in months, were targeted by the police. It wasn’t Lich nor Barber who closed the mall, it was the city who forced the mall to close. The FACT remains that the businesses who chose to remain open were still able to get supplies, get to and from work and had line ups of customers out their doors.
The vilification of peaceful Canadians by government and MSM who simply wanted to be heard is the most disgusting propaganda I’ve seen in my lifetime. We weren’t Nazis, science deniers, anti-vaxers nor were we a small fringe minority with unacceptable views. We were and are simply Canadians who had had enough of being controlled and were pushed to our breaking point and finally, FINALLY a movement started that allowed thousands a way to finally stand up and against what was happening to us.
If Lich and Barber go to prison then so too should every single government official who WAS THE CAUSE OF THIS PROTEST!
If Lich and Barber go to prison I hope and pray a movement starts that makes the Freedom Convoy pale in comparison.
There are millions of Canadians who are awake and see what’s happening in this country. The smoke is billowing with the glowing embers of anger and frustration just waiting for that final gust to completely ignite and burn out of control. When that happens, history, once again, will be made and we WILL be heard!
🚨 DEAR ELECTIONS CANADA 🚨
100+ people hijacked Pierre’s by-election
Tomas Szuchewycz is listed as the official agent for nearly all of them.
Under the Elections Act, he must:
1) Open separate bank accounts for every campaign
2) Keep records, filings, and transactions 100% isolated
3) Follow strict reporting and audit rules
4) Face fines, jail, and disqualification for mistakes
So the real question:
Is Elections Canada even checking?
Or are they just rubber-stamping this circus?
The “longest ballot” scam mocks the system but the bigger joke is a regulator that isn’t regulating.