Journalist|Thinker|Dip Journalism|BSc Sociology| MA Dev Studies|On Twitter 4 stimulating intellectual engagement supported by facts reason logic & deep thoughts
@Garikai1Gorey@ProfJNMoyo @varimahwemasike Well I focused on the video he cited. He may have tried, but that is not to say he spoke out like he is saying in retrospect.
@Garikai1Gorey@ProfJNMoyo @varimahwemasike Well I focused on the video he cited. He may have tried, but that is not to say he spoke out like he is saying in retrospect.
@STinhu@glenmpani That is likely to be a mammoth task. Mainly because the masses are not on Twitter or Instagram for example. There is also a serious disconnect between online and offline. I personally think that going to grassroots and shop floor would help start a real change
@glenmpani@violetgonda In addition, it creates a feel good attitude. I tweet and declare that I participated. No one goes further to ascertain the effect of the effort. And the life cycle of hashtags is very very short. 3 days is the average it is very hard to sustain the campaign.
@ProfJNMoyo @varimahwemasike I may have accessed the other video. What I saw from the video was what you called party capture. Good presentation then but to say it mentions Gukurahundi, may be stretching it too far. Like I said maybe what I have may be different.
@angelaquintal@sherwiebp@FullViewSABC@CPJAfrica @TheGlobe_404 No it's not like you Mis-spoke. You lied. We should use a noun for one who lies to refer to you. Or should I say you miss-poke that is missed a poke into affairs you know nothing about.
@Protymes@TeeMuchehiwa@maDube_@LynneStactia@StaceyFadzayi@DuchessTalitha Now we are talking about the language but you brought in the issue of logic Logic and language may converge but my arguments were spurred by the logic not the language I am more clear in Shona thus wouldn't want to argue over a language am not good at but subject like logic I can
@Protymes@TeeMuchehiwa@maDube_@LynneStactia@StaceyFadzayi@DuchessTalitha My understanding of logic may be different from yours. The initial statement, the subject of debate, made serious assumptions. From the statement, it was easy to make a wrong conclusion. This makes the statement entirely syllogistic, a syllogy.
@Protymes@TeeMuchehiwa@maDube_@LynneStactia@StaceyFadzayi@DuchessTalitha Maybe it was about the logic. I was looking at the statement as constructed. Maybe if you had sneaked in the word logic or its variant. As constructed, the logic of the statement presupposes safety before independence. That was the logic
@gama_stanley I am not sure how you came to talk but i think as a journalist you may also have asked him about his past activities and their bearing on his return. Handiye Tyson we violence here?
@LloydMsipa Maybe you want to say something but that photo was taken when they belonged to #Zapu. When differences emerged they split. Just like your fledgling party split when there were differences.
@JoiceMujuru_ Thanks for the tweet. But I think there are too many ideas in one tweet. The opening sentence promises something and then we see we are moving to origins. Then we see you mention the vulnerable, but did not explain who these are.
@ProfJNMoyo@nelsonchamisa@Twitter Ignore those charlatans Prof. They are very behind. They should have written that you worked on the 2018 elections not this advisory role