@dlb3dlb Hey bud, we have hospitals, ambulances and a significant helicopter rescue system. What exactly could the US provide?
Although 'condolences' would be nice.
Reminder: Canada is reacting not instigating with 'threats and punishments'.
@DeafCanuck9069 Normally Id agree but they bought the company and part of that purchase agreement was a employment commitment. Other companies could have bought it instead but this one was approved despite the company being American because of binding commitments.
@brianlilley@DaneLloydMP ....When he phoned the cops on the senior that 'grabbed his sweater vest' asking him to get off his property ... he bacame the biggest 'P' there ever was in politics.
I have an idea. What if the corporate lobbyists appearing on television or radio had to disclose on the air any relevant conflicts of interest before commenting on the news? For example, if a person working for firms like Rubicon, Teneo or TACT appeared on CBC or CTV, they had to disclose that they make money lobbying Mark Carney? That way when these lobbyists support any specific politician or policy, the audience has adequate information to assess the credibility of their commentary? What do you guys think?
@saskridergal Not just left though.
🛢He spent significant energy threatening nations for buying Russian.
🛢He 'claims' to support Ukraine but this feeds the war machine.
🛢It's 'fake' so little product it does nothing really to fix the supply issue
Not worth the hit to his credibility imho
Should the Province of Alberta cease to be part of Canada and become an independent state?
Important: please like and repost to reach a larger sample size after voting 🗳️
@Landonforward14 Lol, Ill be avoiding the insurance claim and risk that ticket that will never get issued. Nanny state. Literally a fake issue. No one's tearing through during a hail storm.
Imagine being @PierrePoilievre.
This projection has the CPC winning just 73 seats nationwide, 36 of them in Alberta.
That means nearly HALF of the entire Conservative caucus would come from Alberta.
And your response to growing frustration in Alberta with Ottawa?
Assign Alberta MP @DaneLloydMP to campaign against Albertans who want to fundamentally change their relationship with Ottawa.
When almost half your political lifeline is sitting in one province, you might want to start listening to it.
Judy — I hope you’ve enjoyed being back in Alberta and had a chance to take in our beautiful Rocky Mountains. I remember well your interviews with me in Ottawa during the POEC hearings.
But your description of Forever Canadian raises a rather extraordinary issue.
You describe them as a group “fighting back against Alberta separation” and encouraging the Stay side to vote in force on October 19.
That sounds remarkably like campaigning.
Yet Elections Alberta says Forever Canadian is not “campaigning.” The consequence is significant: the pro-Canada group is not subject to the same donation limits, reporting obligations and financing restrictions imposed on pro-independence groups.
So we now have the Prime Minister and a federal cabinet minister greeting volunteers from an organization actively encouraging one side of Alberta’s referendum — while Elections Alberta treats that organization differently from groups campaigning for the other side.
That double standard should concern everyone, regardless of how they intend to vote.
People can disagree passionately about Alberta’s future. But the referee has to apply the rules evenly.
When one side is tightly regulated and restricted while an organization openly mobilizing the other side is treated as though it is not campaigning, it is unequal treatment and gives one side an advantage.
And that damages something much more important than either side’s campaign: public trust in the fairness and impartiality of Alberta’s electoral process.