Are you working on a paper with a methodological focus? Consider submitting that paper to the Research Methods track at the 2025 AMS Annual Conference.
CfP: https://t.co/PM7JA0gp57.
@_s_adler_@CBScph@LMU_Muenchen@AcadMktingSci
Conversations with the Research Methods Track Chairs Susanne Adler and Constant Pieters for the 2025 AMS Annual Conference in Montréal, Canada, May 21 - 23, 2025. Consider submitting your work! #AMS25MONTREAL#AMSmarketingCFP: https://t.co/RSz2FK36hD
@MatthewBJane can I ask you a quick question? are measurement error corrections for (log) odds ratios available? Does it make sense to just: attenuated odds -> attenuated r -> disattenuated r -> d?
@maireadkshaw It does! Here's a silly (not very well formatted) example.
foo=list(1,2,3,"a", 4)
bar=rep(NA,5)
for(i in 1:length(foo)){
bar[i] = tryCatch(foo[[i]]+3,
error = function(e){"Error"})
}
Last week, I presented our (Rik Pieters, @AurelieLemmens1) research on moderation analysis in face of measurement error at #acr2023 in Seattle.
All materials are available on OSF: https://t.co/KAGfdtBWUe.
Thanks @SIMONJBLANCHARD for getting us on board!
@aconsres@CBScph
@MatthewBJane Does that mean that we can say here that the reliability of the dichotomized score is .79^2 = .62? Approximately. Assuming that the continuous score is a true score.
@MatthewBJane Thanks. No simpler way that I know of. A formatting function (maybe formatC()), gsub(), or stringr equivalent, probably works for longer vectors, or those that can not be hard coded. Removing the leading zero AND keeping the 0 (as in .20 instead of .2) might be a hassle.