@spanglermt Racial corollary to Werry's Law (Contra's Corollary, if it's not taken): a white person is not allowed have an opinion on race relations unless it is first given by a black person.
So many people are trying to get me back in the podcast circuit, lol. But I've been looking for something special to do for the release of episode 50 of TLH.
If you've enjoyed my work, please tag @AuronMacintyre so I can talk about Rightwing indie art and 40k for an hour.
I posted this years ago on another platform:
“When someone is seeking to get better at something, where there is growth we naturally see it as ‘progress’, and this is because they are moving in the direction of a perceived goal.
The only reference point that contemporary Progressivism has is its starting point. It has no telos.
All it knows is that it wants to change from what it once was—discarding any form of heritage. And the term that most properly applies to this is Deviation.
So understand them for what they truly are: Deviants.”
Those who aren't familiar with the movie "Reign of Fire", here's a quick summary: It's a wacky sci-fi movie from 2002 set in the late 2020's post-apocalyptic future. London has been destroyed and the whole country is overrun. The British are holed up in castles and enclaves; they've mostly been demoralized and too under-equipped to mount any kind of meaningful resistance. They're just hoping to survive. Americans had the same problem in their country, but found that the solitary source of all the spawning was in London in the early 2000's. So they mount a hare-brained trans-Atlantic trip with military equipment, link up with the British survivors and re-invigorate in them the spirit and means to fight. They go to London to eradicate the source of the infestation, and have to embody the ancient hero archetype to finally bring it down. The French arrive once the threat is gone.
Israel, by population, is about one-thirty-fourth the size of the United States.
Hezbollah just killed 4 Israeli soldiers.
Adjusted for population, that’s the equivalent of 136 American soldiers killed.
How would WE react?
one of the lesser noticed things about this moment was that these mobs run towards gunshots.
just keep that in mind and fill out the form 4 for a silencer
In one sense, I understand the
“We have American heroes, we don't need foreign ones” argument.
It’s true that America has many strong historical figures and a deep tradition to draw from.
But on a more basic level, this response misses the point. Some people do it purely out of love for their people. Others use this as a sleight of hand to avoid the pressing and sticky issue before us.
But...
-At no point have the Longhouse Managers, Fence Sitters, or Accusers of the brethren, in their many slanderous accusations of me, ever said:
"You know what, Jolly. You are literally James A. Garfield"
"Wow! You want a country for your own people? You are literally James K. Polk"
"You believe there are differences int he races? You are literally Jefferson Davis"
No.
There is one name that gets tied to your neck with the intention of drowning you in the sea of outrage.
That is the name of Adolf Hitler.
You won't be compared to the
-Confederacy
-The The Union Army
-Or the Cajun Navy.
It will always be the Nazis.
While it would be nice to never have to speak of the people of another country, this just simply isn't reality.
-As long as you are RW
-As long as you are a CN
-As long as you are White
-As long as you are Straight
-As long as you are a Man
You will contend with the name of Adolf Hitler, and the work of the Nazis.
You can complain about it.
You can avoid it.
Or you can take their weapon from them, grind it into powder, and force them to drink it.
I choose the latter.