WHO IS THE CONTROL GROUP?
The Control Group is an independent, observational health outcomes study working outside of the corporate medical establishment to gain vital insights into the emerging patterns of disease in the post-pandemic era.
Participants in the study share anonymised data about their health and lifestyle choices to help non-partisan researchers establish the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals, like the COVID-19 vaccine.
https://t.co/2Q2eBPM9Lg
WHAT WE DO:
💉 World's largest, independent control group for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
https://t.co/2RiYY08LUp
🔬 Anonymised health database – for research independent of Big Pharma
https://t.co/DFF51puLgP
OUR SERVICES:
🪪 Vaccine Study (VCG) Cards – asserting your right not to be vaccinated https://t.co/NTRBi2BSRZ
🪪Health Cards – carry your medical record with you wherever you go
https://t.co/QeoXNoFv4h
👨👩👧 Global community hub – connect over shared visions; learning & sharing together
https://t.co/5Wg3JU35vk
@VigilantFox@MidwesternDoc As someone who is hyper-mobile, with 2/3 hyper-mobile children - this tracks. History of being super sensitive to any kind of medications and high vaccine reactivity. Thankfully we realised this well before the covid era.
SHOCKING: Dr. Aseem Malhotra testifies about MASSIVE truth bombs on mRNA vaccine harms, scientific corruption, and the betrayal of public trust.
“I have called for a MORATORIUM on these UNSAFE and DEFECTIVE products…there is SERIOUS HARM…”
THIS IS WHAT BRAVERY LOOKS LIKE…
… they gave him. They did not listen when my mum said he was sensitive and likely react, tried to give him drugs he had already reacted to, then hailed Keytruda as a miracle drug for some - as in it may work brilliantly, or not at all, but no mention of the fact it could send the cancer into hyper-drive in some.
Just one of so many reasons I no longer trust the NHS or the BBC.
Keytruda - the BBC article only mentions the positives, but this is the cancer drug that can, in some people, have the opposite effect and send the cancer into hyper-drive. This is what it did to my dad. It killed him in the most horrible way, with tumours bursting out of his head and face. They never mentioned the possibility of this, despite my dad having unexpected reactions to most things [cont…]
https://t.co/ffxRCC8Bwg
Medication cascade from a single statin prescription:
- Month 1: statin prescribed for a cholesterol number
- Month 3: muscle pain develops (CoQ10 depleted by the drug itself)
- Month 4: NSAIDs prescribed for the muscle pain
- Month 8: liver enzymes elevated (from the statin)
- Month 10: cognitive decline begins (the brain is 25% cholesterol by dry weight)
- Month 12: blood pressure rises (CoQ10 depletion affects heart muscle)
- Month 14: ACE inhibitor added for the blood pressure
- Month 18: fatigue deepens (mitochondrial dysfunction worsening)
- Month 20: antidepressant prescribed for the "low mood"
- Month 24: glucose control deteriorates (statins increase diabetes risk by 30%)
- Month 30: metformin added to the pile
Started with one drug for one number on a chart.
Ended with five drugs managing the side effects of the first drug. Each one billed to the NHS or your insurer. Each one a recurring revenue line for life.
The original cholesterol number? Lower. The patient? Worse in every measurable way.
Modern medicine, working as designed.
I feel there is something missing from this list of possible causes for the rise in cancers in young persons 🧐.
It also doesn’t state the time-period of the increase they are referring to. The paper they refer to says 2001-2019, so not the covid 🥕 - but there’s other veg in that box 😉.
https://t.co/yEgthLGmZc
They SAY our health has declined over the last decade, but look at where it actually starts to significantly dip on their chart. BBC gaslighting again 🙄.
https://t.co/CSphHR7itX
@BorisJohnson ‼️MHRA HAVE EVIDENCE OF HARM‼️
Tribunal against MHRA forced them to release Yellow Card Vaccine Monitor they had sat on for 4 years.
(36,604 participants; 2514 pregnant)
Conclusion:
1 in 7 (13.7%) had a SERIOUS medical event.
I've put an official question to the relevant minister on whether they'll conduct a full risk assessment regarding their experiments to 'dim the sun'.
Not a sentence I thought I'd be typing a few days ago...
The majority of Control Group participants would choose to avoid vaccinated blood if possible, and it is one of our most asked questions.
In the UK, this is nearly impossible. We have helped some people save their own blood for preplanned ops by writing letters for them, but it should be an option for anyone until it is definitively proven that there is no risk.
I’ve personally talked to a number of groups who are devising blood tests for vaccine /mRNA presence.
There is also the issue of raising awareness of ‘bloodless surgery’ and blood plasm alternatives, and educating people on optimal blood health prior surgery (of course, this is irrelevant for emergency situations).
Many people are saying that we have all been ‘spiked’ and of course, there are a plethora of detoxes available, BUT without acknowledgement of a defined difference in jabbed/unjabbed by the NHS, those of us who are aware of the potential risks have no guaranteed way of being able to avoid it in an urgent blood-loss situation.