The original Harry Potter was a fine story. It doesn’t have to be bad for it to be worth writing a different take. Just the opposite! The space of books is inexhaustible. A good book in bookspace suggests the existence of other good books nearby.
“It sounds cliche but Manchester will always have its own brand of business. We shouldn’t try to emulate London, we should just get better train wifi.” — @tim_dempsey https://t.co/pTMRJZDRf4
| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|
It is not from the benevolence of
the butcher, the brewer, or the
baker, that we expect our dinner,
but from their regard to their
own interest.
|____________|
(\__/) ||
(•ㅅ•) ||
/ づ
@cmMcConnaughy Does objective positioning de-humanise the study or its importance, and is this a bad thing? I think not - grounding a study in humane benefit is sufficient
Things that happen in Silicon Valley and also the Soviet Union:
- waiting years to receive a car you ordered, to find that it's of poor workmanship and quality
- promises of colonizing the solar system while you toil in drudgery day in, day out