Hande Kuruba Vazirs of Ballari
A Thread🧵
Hande Hanumappa was the greatest Kuruba Hande Vazir of all time. like any other Hande kuruba person, no contemporary painting or mural of Hanumappa hande exists, so they use edited pic of Bedar or a Maratha king is used to portray him.
Low iq Dodiya bandar. Any Kannada language connection itself debunks Hagela dynasty theory of this coin.
This coin is similar to Jagadekamalla Salunkhe & Jagadeva Pawars coins that means the Visaladeva of this coin was from same 11th CE while your Visal hagela was from 13th ce.
The coin showcases two temples with Carnese Sri symbols, Gadhe ko Scribed legends & Scribed symbols mein difference hi nhi pata 🤣🤣, The sign of Srivatsva in Karnataka is called Carnese Sri but gadhon ko numismatic ka N nhi nhi ata Woh Kya jaane 🤫🤫.
Historyless Dodiya Bandars aka wannabe Paramaras were treated as like a langurs by the Maratha rulers of Malwa and used slang term " Rangdi " ( Jungli Suwar in Marathi ) for you. Thats your real Aukad.
Ghati Langurs can't keep still until you belt them properly. This guy comes every once in a while & gets to know his aukkat & then disappear. Though I have quoted inscriptions, this guy is still on Bardic Tales like How A mountain rat defied Aurangzeb..
"Dodiya older ree " Sheeiz.
Whether they are older or not doesn't even matter. You historyless Purbhangiya started connecting Dodiya to Paramara cause you know there's no relevant Dodiya history.
.. Even on border of Gujarat & MP & On Dodiyas then they are still older than all Marathas put togetherness 🤣🤣. Baaki Is this your manners while talking to your official “ 𝘼𝙙𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙒𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚 𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙖 ”🤫🤫. Kheer Neither are yadavas relevant nor theiriinscriptions.
Low Iq Dodiya aka wannabe paramara. This coin belongs to an unidentified Maratha ruler of the same name Visaladeva. The coin mentions " Canarese Shri " this makes it clear that it doesn't belongs to Hagela dynasty. Low Iq researcher of this paper failed to point it out.
The same chauhan feudatories were defeated and dragged like hogs by Jadhavrao forces.
raiding and belting Malwa time to time was child's play for Ratta, Salunkhe / Chalukya and Jadhavraos. & since when historyless dodiya purbiya bandars became paramaras?
🧵Yadava Apologetics.
Retards always like to use slangs like “ 𝗠𝘂𝗵 𝗕𝗲𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗫𝗬𝗭 ” without even knowing the reality of their conflated inscriptions. Arjunavarman's Chauhan Feudatory had squashed Yadavas & even captured some of their forts.
[ 1/2 ]
Hagela ruled over Konkan re. Literally inscription and coins of Hagelas are found in Konkan. But Maratha Rashtrakuta and Salunkhe / Chalukyas ruled over your tatti land for centuries.
Baaki Ganwar, read properly I have stated at most Vaghelas ( chalukayas of Lata) were defeated not Paramara themselves you Briming Dog 🤣🤣. Showing illiteracy by Calling Vaghelas by funny names won't help you Vaghelas were your baap for a decade when they conquered Konkan.
Low Iq Dodiya aka wannabe paramara. This coin belongs to an unidentified Maratha ruler of the same name Visaladeva. The coin mentions " Canarese Shri " this makes it clear that it doesn't belongs to Hagela dynasty. Low Iq researcher of this paper failed to point it out.
The whole of Konkan was subjugated by Visaladeva Vaghela who established his sway over Paratha land & minted gold coins of the type of Jaggadeva Paramar. The hoard of coins makes it clear that Visaladeva belted Krishna yadava and annexed North-west maharashtra from the Senuvas.
@jrxtr_ 3) Associating with Salunkhe? No. they use " Salunkhe " itself
4) I already showed you the memory. now don't repeat the "no memory" line
muslim sources also recorded how Marathas rememberd their clans like Seuna Jadhavrao, Gaurdrao Ratta &the Chalukyarao https://t.co/DghZ76rhkh
@jrxtr_ 1) Definitely. All Chalukya / Salunkhe branches of Kalyani, Khandesh, Sangameshwar, Paithan descended from Imperial Salunkhe / Chalukyas of Badami only.
2) It not just classify as memory but bedunks the modern claim that Chalukya - Salunkhe is just phonetic variation.
@jrxtr_ Cause Salunkhe is carved on Chalukya INSCRIPTIONS which your dukkaradigga historians tries to hide. they preserved and boasted chalukya memory in their records. Your bhokkadiga public didn't even knew about chalukyas before british epigraphists discovered chalukya inscriptions
> Haihaya Jadhavs from Mahishmati saar. that doesn't make them Achhoot purbhiya gondput.
> All later Kaikeya inscriptions are from Konkan. They never stayed at chitradurg. also the Chitaldurg inscription doesn't say kaikeyas were ruling from chitaldurg