@rawdawglawdawg @17For6 So just because they could have handed it off to a capable RB, that virtually negates all the importance of Allen’s rushing TD? Gtfo
@_SoCalDolfan__@17For6 Listen to the chargers game where he’s mic’d up, is that really a crybaby that just wants his way? Stay mad tua isn’t 6’4 237 truck
@BruceExclusive He was what he needed to be, that’s all it is. They came in with a game plan to run Cook, Murray, and Johnson down their throats. Allen still had a great game even with not a lot of passing yards.
@Conserv51428386@MikeCatalana Did we not watch the same game? Allen was going crazy, if Toney scored he woulda had a minute thirty to close the game out, the bills still prolly woulda won
@KevinMassare Tbh they prolly shoulda let that fly, bc Allen still had a minute thirteen to god own and score, and he definitely would have done that. Wouldntve changed a thing
@AlexanderM0829@KevinMassare Toney did not even look at the ref at all, you think the ref is gonna go out of his way and let him know to line up? No reason he should have line up over the line, at all, and he prolly should have checked with the refs to make sure he was good
@JonathanDaity@i2e21Ke I think that was the point Gillian was making. That neither Jake nor Amy are more or less developed than the other, because both aspects, Justice and Care, hold equal ground #i2e21
@lydi_sacheli I do like that also. The other ethical theories we looked at didn’t look at personal relationships too much, like deontology’s bad utilitarianism #i2e21
I find the connection between Kant’s idea that our actions can’t just conform to duty, and Aristotles idea that happiness is intentional, not something accidental, really interesting, even though the two are very far apart ideologically #I2E21
When talking about proper functioning of the human soul and how it’s achieved by cultivating certain sorts of it that allow us to flourish, my first thought is that the cultivation could be of our higher faculties as human beings (bringing it back to Mill) #I2E21
One question I have is that, should we base our obligation to non-humans solely on whether or not we have a personal relationship to them? No, because that doesn’t take into account the needs of the animal, the suffering that may be incurred. #i2e21
This kingdom of ends idea is making me think about democracy. The idea that Kant has about a kingdom of ends, where everyone is a law giver and law obeyer seems very similar to the US, where the people are the law givers (vote in people to make our laws, enact our
I guess I have a little confusion regarding hypothetical imperative. If given E as an end for you, do M, would that work in relation to human laws. You must obey M, not murdering people, because you’re desire E, not going to jail? #I2E21
Them as a means to an end (have to pay the gas station employee to fill your tank), you are still treating them as an end (because you are allowing them to make that choice to take your money and give you your gas) #I2E21
I find the point of not treating people as a means only really interesting. The idea that treating people as an end means respecting their autonomy, allowing them to make those choices. I guess the same can be said for a gas station employee. Although you are treating
I think this idea of the fun hundred dollar bill can also translate to anything that has value. Why is the Mona Lisa considered to be absolutely priceless? What about gives it value if not for people valuing it at that much? #I2E21
I can definitely see situations where I do my duty because it’s my duty even though I hate it, such as a job. I have a moral obligation to pay my landlord rent, so that means I have an obligation to work at a job. Even though I don’t want to, I have a duty to #I2E21