@Bosslogic Comics Wanda is not as powerful as MCU Wanda tbh. If Storm doesn't fry her with Lightning before she can say 'No More Mutants', then Jean, Emma or Xavier is certainly handling her. MCU Wanda? She clears everyone but Jean.
@theStephenJKD@PaulPooper2 She reset her position. We saw her move through bodies very quickly, it's likely she could have made up the distance quick. We also don't know her starting position. She may have been close to MJ to begin with since at this point, she's toying with Spidey.
@cyclopsiryn I think Jubilee is an easier character to fit in at any point, tbh. Kitty should really be introduced when some of the actors decide to move on and they need to introduce the next generation.
@NotClone777@amadaoffor But he didn't make sure she was ready to govern and that's why she struggles when she takes King's Landing. Preparation includes having his heir taught the way of governing, and securing her succession. He failed in both regards. If he had done things properly, Alicent's word../1
@moonwavez@sunfyressz He royally fucked up in not securing Rhaenyra's succession and preparing her to be Queen, but he wasn't a bad king in any other regard. Also he would have needed another child to be the spare.
@SamCapLover Trying to make out that LGBT people can't play straight roles when Jonathan Bailey exists as a shining example is wild. Grace Randolph is repulsive.
@ororoswind The thing with the MCU X-Men films is that they'll likely be evergreen, Marvel will keep making them and when actors want to leave, there's always more mutants to replace those characters. Kitty is likely going to be one of those replacements down the line.
@ellieeldritchh Kitty Pryde strikes me as a character best introduced in the second trilogy when a few of the main actors will likely want to move on. Jubes is quite easily slotted in anywhere while Kitty makes for a good audience POV character.
@NotClone777@amadaoffor Part of the prep would have been establishing her as his heir without question. Essentially if Viserys had done his duty properly, there would be no DOTD. Rhaenyra's main mistake is not sticking it out in King's Landing and thus allowing the Hightowers to snatch control.
@Cajun_Ragin0 Having her be X-23 in the new X-Men film would be messy, I think. I like the idea of her taking up the Wolverine mantle and operating in the MCU, but I think the X-Men should be a fresh start. New team, new actors etc.
@NotClone777@amadaoffor By that I mean that Viserys failed in his duties to prep his heir. Rhaenyra wasn't taught how to govern and what we see her doing is basically trying to imitate Viserys on a surface level and it doesn't work since he was a peacetime king and she's a wartime queen.
@Fenrirtheicewo1 Honestly, we know so little about the earlier avatars outside of Wan, and now Sonam that there's a lot of room to do stuff like this tbh. After all it was canon that Avatar Wan's story wasn't widely known, it would be easy for other early avatars to fall into obscurity.
@amadaoffor Also Rhaenyra's still literally grieving the two sons she's still recently lost while she's ruling King's Landing. She's not mad, she's in over her head and grieving.
@amadaoffor Dany's madness was badly done in GOT. It wasn't set up properly at all and the writers treated it like a switch instead of a slow descent. Rhaenyra's not mad, either, she's a victim of not being properly prepped for the throne she was promised.
@YourPalRags She literally kills no one, were you not paying attention in the cinema? You give more grace to Loki than you do to Jean when her story hasn't even truly begun. After one film, Jean is on the path to redemption, after one Thor film, Loki's still the villain.