The Best Kind of Tie
A talk show set, two people in blazers, a red button on the table between them, and the question: "What's the best kind of tie?" It sounds like the opener to a networking seminar. It reads like the punchline to a joke about corporate culture that nobody actually told.
The Romans had a version of this conversation, except they called it the toga debate. The cut of your toga, the quality of the wool, the way it draped across your shoulder, these were not fashion choices. They were political signals. Senators wore the toga praetexta with its purple border not because they liked purple, but because fabric was the language of power, and everyone in the Forum understood the grammar fluently.
The Persians did the same thing with their tiara and robe hierarchy, the Ottomans with their kaftan protocols, the British Empire with its regimental tie system that literally told you who a man was, where he served, and whether you should trust him with a secret or a sword. The tie, in every civilization that adopted it, was never about aesthetics. It was a credentialing system stitched into silk.
The prank is that we keep asking which tie is best as if the answer is about color or pattern, when the real question has always been about which door the tie opens, and which rooms it quietly keeps you out of forever.
#AncientRome #HumanNature #HistoryRepeats
Every Business Lunch in the 80s
You already know exactly what this is. Two guys in shoulder-padded blazers, a woman in turquoise doing most of the actual thinking, a basket of rolls nobody touches, and at least two glasses of wine before anyone mentions a single deliverable. The 1980s business lunch was not a meal, it was a ritual, a theater of dominance dressed up as hospitality.
The Romans had a word for this: the convivium. The formal banquet where senators, merchants, and generals conducted the real business of empire, not in the Senate chamber, but over roasted dormouse and Falernian wine. The triclinium was where alliances were made and enemies were neutralized, where the reclining posture was itself a power signal, a performance of leisure that said I am secure enough to lie down in front of you. The 80s business lunch is just the triclinium with a Mastercard and a maรฎtre d'.
What the decade perfected was the American version of what the Persians called the royal table, the idea that breaking bread with someone created a debt, an obligation that transcended the transaction itself. Every bite shared was a bond forged, or a trap set. The vintage video quality here makes it look quaint, but the mechanics are identical to every power lunch happening right now in a steakhouse in Midtown.
The prank is that we replaced the Senate with the boardroom, the toga with the blazer, and the slave pouring wine with a sommelier, and called it progress.
#AncientRome #HistoryRepeats #EmpireMindset
The Debrief
There is something profoundly absurd about watching a man in a gold chain and a number 07 jersey sit across from the former Director of Central Intelligence, papers and snacks on the table between them, and still somehow hold the room. Admiral Stansfield Turner, the man who oversaw the CIA during one of its most controversial restructuring periods, sits composed and patient, while the guy across from him is clearly not reading from any prepared brief. This is the meeting nobody sent a memo about.
Rome had a word for this dynamic: the *amicus principis*, the informal friend of power, the man with no official title who somehow ended up in every consequential room. The Senate could draft all the legislation it wanted, but the real conversations happened in private chambers, over food and candlelight, between men whose credentials were purely relational. Turner sitting there with that closed-eyed expression is not confusion, it is recognition. He has seen this before, just in a toga.
The deeper parallel here is the intelligence apparatus itself, which the Roman Empire understood better than we give them credit for. The *frumentarii*, Rome's original intelligence network embedded in grain supply routes, were not recruited from the patrician class. They were recruited from people who moved freely, who fit no profile, who nobody expected to be carrying anything important. The empire did not want clean suits. It wanted people who could sit in any room.
The prank is that power never really changed its recruitment strategy. It just updated the dress code and convinced the rest of us that the formal title is what matters.
#AncientRome #PowerAndControl #HistoryRepeats
When Bro Finally Starts Speaking His Mind
Two people. Two chairs. One red button on the table between them, which honestly tells you everything you need to know about where this conversation is headed. The man starts composed, papers in his lap, and then the gears shift, and suddenly we are watching someone who has decided that today is the day he says the quiet part loud.
The Romans had a name for this kind of theater: the contio, a public assembly where orators performed their convictions for a crowd that had already made up its mind. The genius of the contio was never about changing anyone's opinion. It was about the performance of outrage, the ritual of saying bold things in front of people who nodded vigorously and then went home and did absolutely nothing. Sound familiar.
What is genuinely fascinating here is the internal contradiction on full display. The man floats the idea of preventing a second coming of Caesar, then clarifies he would not take up arms, then gets caught mid-sentence having previously argued for disarming the population entirely. The interviewer's composure never breaks, because she does not need it to. The contradictions collapse on their own weight, the way the Roman Senate's moral posturing collapsed the moment Octavian offered them a clean exit and a comfortable title.
The prank is that the loudest voices in the room are always the least prepared for the question that follows. You can dress up the revolution in a navy blazer and a pinstriped shirt, but the red button is still sitting right there on the table.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HumanNature
First Date Energy in Kazakhstan
What you are watching is Borat Sagdiyev doing what he does best: sitting across from an unsuspecting dinner guest at a formal table, completely dismantling the social contract one question at a time. The progression from intimate two-person conversation to wide state banquet framing is deliberate, a visual joke about how quickly "getting to know a person" can spiral into something that belongs nowhere near white tablecloths and formal place settings. The archival yellow tint makes it feel like a discovered document, evidence of a diplomatic incident that nobody reported.
The Romans had a term for this exact energy: convivium, the formal dinner as a space for political alliance, intellectual exchange, and the careful performance of civility. Roman satirists like Juvenal and Petronius understood that the dining table was where masks slipped, where the gap between official decorum and raw human appetite became impossible to ignore. Trimalchio's feast in the Satyricon exists precisely because a banquet is the one setting where a man will eventually say exactly what he should not.
Kazakhstan here is doing double duty as both subject and backdrop. The post-Soviet context is not incidental: the chaos of an entire civilization's moral framework collapsing left a vacuum where old rules dissolved and new ones had not yet calcified. Borat weaponizes that vacuum, using the guise of cultural ignorance to extract the honesty that Western politeness is specifically designed to suppress.
The prank is that the formal dinner, whether in ancient Rome or modern Central Asia, has always been theater. Borat just refused to read his lines.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #Satire
When the Outfit Speaks First
There is something deeply honest about this clip. A yellow tracksuit, a red cap, glasses, and suddenly the interviewer is no longer asking questions, they are performing. The interviewee, jersey and all, leans in not because the questions are compelling but because the gestures have become a gravitational force of their own.
Rome understood this better than anyone. The toga was not clothing, it was authority made visible. Senators did not simply enter a room, they announced themselves through fabric and posture, and the room adjusted accordingly. Cicero wrote entire treatises on the art of bodily delivery, actio, because the Romans knew that rhetoric was never purely words. The body was always the first argument.
The Greeks called it ethos, the credibility you project before a single syllable leaves your mouth. In the Athenian agora, a man in the right robe with the right bearing could command an audience before his case was made. What this skit captures, with a yellow tracksuit doing the work of a senatorial toga, is that nothing has changed. The costume is still the opening statement, the gesture still the verdict.
The prank is that we built entire institutions around evaluating people on the content of their answers, while the outfit, the posture, and the theatrics made the decision three seconds after the door opened. The interview was never really an interview. It was always a performance review of the performance you gave before the performance began.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoryRepeats
When the Business Lunch Gets Weird
There is something universally recognizable about the moment a polite business lunch crosses an invisible line. One minute you are making careful eye contact over water glasses and bread rolls, the next someone is gesturing with their hands like they are conducting an orchestra, and the whole table has quietly agreed to pretend this is normal. These vintage frames capture that exact threshold, the precise second where professional decorum and raw human strangeness negotiate their terms in real time.
The Romans had a name for this theater: the convivium. The formal dinner was never just about food. It was a carefully staged arena where alliances were tested, patronage was performed, and the wrong gesture at the wrong moment could end a career faster than any public speech in the Forum. Cicero wrote extensively about how a man reveals his true character not in the Senate but at the table, where wine loosens the mask and ambition leaks through the cracks of civility.
The Persians under Darius understood this too. The royal banquet was a political instrument, where proximity to the king's table literally mapped your position in the imperial hierarchy. Herodotus noted that the most dangerous conversations in the ancient world happened over shared meals, precisely because the setting demanded a performance of peace while everyone present was calculating something else entirely.
The prank is that nothing has changed. We swapped the triclinium for the steakhouse, the amphora for the wine list, and the toga for the blazer, but the business lunch remains exactly what it always was: a civilized ritual for uncivilized ambitions.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoricalEchoes
The Zach Galifianakis Treatment
In this clip from "Between Two Ferns," Zach Galifianakis does what almost no one in mainstream media had the nerve to do: he sits across from Hillary Clinton, the would-be first female president, and deadpans that the younger generation is equally excited about her being their first white president. The woman in the blue blazer keeps her composure the way only a career politician can, but you can see the calculation happening in real time behind those eyes.
The Romans had a figure for this exact moment: the court jester, or more precisely, the licensed fool permitted inside the curia to say what senators whispered only in private baths. Augustus himself kept men around who could mock the machinery of power precisely because it made the machinery look confident, unthreatened, in control. The joke was always the pressure valve, never the revolution.
What makes this clip genuinely interesting is that Clinton plays along, which is the sophisticated move, but playing along also neutralizes the point entirely. The coffee and typing questions land as outdated because she says so, and suddenly she controls the frame again. It is the same rhetorical judo that Cicero described when powerful figures absorbed ridicule publicly to defang it privately.
The prank is that satire has always been the empire's best friend. Give the crowd a comedian, let him say the unsayable once, and the unsayable loses all its teeth. Nothing changes. The ferns stay green. The candidate stays on message.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoryRepeats
When You Get The Interviewer Wrong
So the setup here is deceptively simple: a man in sunglasses and a headband gets handed a microphone and pointed at what he thinks is Steve Kerr, except he is very clearly not talking to Steve Kerr. The questions spiral from there, TNT becomes TMT, 40 games and 40 nights becomes a biblical flood narrative, and Noah is apparently a dead woman none of us personally knew. It is a two-minute masterclass in confident incompetence, delivered with the unshakeable composure of someone who has never once questioned whether they belong in the room.
Rome had a word for this energy: dignitas. The performance of authority so committed that the audience forgets to ask for the credentials. Julius Caesar walked into the Senate with the same frequency that our guy walks into a press credential, which is to say, whenever he felt like it, and the institution just kind of absorbed it because the confidence was loud enough to drown out the procedural objections.
The Greeks called it parrhesia, the fearless speech of a man who believes his perspective is the correct one regardless of preparation. Socrates used it to interrogate generals and politicians who clearly did not know what they were talking about. The difference is Socrates was trying to expose the ignorance. Our guy here is the ignorance, fully embodied, fully unaware, and somehow producing the more compelling television.
The prank is that sports media has been running this exact format for decades, dressing up spectacle as expertise, and nobody blinked until the bit became too obvious to ignore.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoryRepeats
Every Diplomatic Dinner After the Third Glass
There is a universal arc to formal diplomacy, and this meme captures it with surgical precision. The man in the gray blazer starts the evening as a composed, measured representative of whatever institution sent him, then somewhere between the second and third pour, the mask slips, the gestures widen, and the woman across the table shifts from politely engaged to genuinely entertained. We have all either been this man or watched him from across a white tablecloth, counting his glasses.
The Romans understood this dynamic so thoroughly they built a political culture around it. The convivium, Rome's formal dinner tradition, was never just about food. It was theater, negotiation, and intelligence gathering all compressed into one candlelit room, and Pliny the Younger wrote extensively about how wine at these events separated the careful politician from the honest one. Senators who spent the afternoon performing gravitas in the Forum would spend the evening revealing actual alliances, actual grievances, and actual ambitions over the third cup of Falernian wine.
The Persians, notably, institutionalized this even further. Herodotus tells us that Persian nobles made it a formal practice to deliberate on important matters twice: once sober, once drunk. The thinking was that sobriety gave you caution and drunkenness gave you honesty, and any decision that survived both states was probably the right one. The diplomat in this meme is essentially performing the second deliberation in real time, uninvited.
The prank is that we dress up geopolitical theater in linen napkins and crystal stemware, as if the formality of the setting changes what negotiation actually is: two people, some wine, and the slow erosion of whatever performance they walked in wearing.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoryRepeats
The Business Plan No One Asked For
In 2014, a storefront in Los Feliz opened its doors as "Dumb Starbucks," a perfect replica of the real thing, green aprons and all, except legally classified as an art parody. News vans lined the block, crowds wrapped around the building, cups sold for $499 on eBay, and the entire city of Los Angeles treated a copyright loophole like a cultural event. Three women in sunglasses stood outside drinking what was, technically, free coffee from a joke.
Rome had a word for this: ludi. Public games, spectacles, events staged specifically to redirect the energy of a restless population toward something entertaining and ultimately harmless. The satirists of the Roman Republic, from Lucilius to Juvenal, understood that the most effective criticism of power is not a pamphlet but a performance, something the crowd can line up for, photograph, and carry home in a cup.
What Nathan Fielder actually built here was not a coffee shop. It was a demonstration of how thin the membrane between brand and reality really is, how a logo, a color, an apron, and a handwritten name on a cup constitute the entire substance of a $100 billion corporation's identity in the public imagination. The Greeks called this mimesis, the imitation of reality so precise it becomes indistinguishable from the thing itself. Forbes spent a whole article wondering if it was Banksy.
The prank is that Starbucks was never selling coffee. It was selling the performance of coffee, and one comedian with a lease and a green apron exposed the whole architecture in a weekend.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoryRepeats
When The Arena Meets The Boardroom
There is something genuinely fascinating about watching a man in a yellow hoodie and red cap dismantle a formal TNT panel in real time, not through aggression, but through pure, unfiltered chaos energy. The suits sit there, frozen in that particular kind of professional discomfort that only happens when someone refuses to follow the script. He is talking about fishing. They are talking about basketball. Both are technically correct.
This is the exact dynamic Rome experienced every time a provincial general came back from the frontier and sat down with the Senate. The legions understood war through mud and blood, through "win or go home" in its most literal sense, while the senators debated strategy from marble floors and cushioned chairs. The gap between those two languages, the field and the forum, was never really bridged. It was just managed, awkwardly, with a lot of uncomfortable eye contact.
The Greeks called this kind of clash "agon," the fundamental contest, not just of athletes but of worldviews colliding in a shared space. The fishing metaphor is not confused, it is actually a more honest description of elimination than anything the panel offered. You lose, you go home, you fish. The Romans would have understood that immediately. Cato the Elder was famously more comfortable with a plow than a podium.
The prank is that we built billion-dollar broadcast empires around sports to create common language between these two worlds, and it still produces this, four suits staring at a man describing the NBA playoffs as forty days and forty nights in the wilderness, and no one knows what to do next.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoryRepeats
Every First Date at a Fancy Restaurant
There is something universally recognizable about this sequence. A man, gray blazer, fancy restaurant, utensils in hand, performing what he clearly believes is a captivating monologue. The woman across from him, turquoise top, neutral expression, slowly becoming an archaeologist of patience, excavating a way out of this conversation one uncomfortable glance at a time.
The Romans had a term for this energy: the convivium, the formal dinner gathering where rhetoric and performance were inseparable from the meal itself. Cicero wrote entire treatises on the art of dinner conversation, because the Romans understood that how you spoke at a table was how you governed, how you seduced, how you survived. The problem is that most men at a convivium were performing for the room, not actually talking to the person across from them.
That distinction matters. The Persians, notably different from Rome in this regard, actually had a cultural concept called adab, a framework of refined conduct that prioritized listening as a form of social intelligence. The Greeks called it sophrosyne, moderation, a virtue that applied as much to speaking as to eating or drinking. Every ancient civilization worth studying had a word for knowing when to stop talking. Apparently that knowledge did not survive into the modern dinner reservation.
The prank is that we built entire industries around the first date, the reservation, the outfit, the restaurant choice, the carefully curated version of yourself, and the one variable nobody optimizes for is the actual conversation. The venue is perfect. The silence is deafening.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HistoryRepeats
The Business Plan No One Asked For
In 2014, a man in Los Angeles opened "Dumb Starbucks Coffee," slapped the word "dumb" in front of every menu item, and watched international news crews fly in from Korea to cover a joke about a venti latte. The legal shield was parody law, the product was absurdity, and the line outside stretched around the block for over an hour. This is either the greatest performance art piece of the decade or proof that we will queue for anything if a camera is pointed at it.
The Romans had a word for this: spectaculum. The empire understood, long before cable news existed, that the crowd does not gather for the thing itself but for the theater surrounding it. A gladiator fight was never really about the gladiators. It was about the roar, the anticipation, the shared delusion that what was happening mattered. Dumb Norah Jones duets on a CD rack inside a fake coffee shop is, functionally, the same offering: a ritual object that derives its entire value from collective attention.
What makes this specific spectacle so sharp is that it exposed the architecture of a brand. Starbucks had spent decades convincing you that its logo was sacred, that the mermaid meant something, that "venti" was a personality. One man with a printer and a storefront dissolved all of it in a weekend. The Greeks called this aporia, that moment of genuine confusion where the system you trusted reveals it has no floor beneath it.
The prank is that Starbucks became a global news story by being mocked, which is the most effective advertising a corporation can receive and the one thing they cannot buy.
#AncientRome #HumanNature #HistoryRepeats
The British Sports Correspondent
There is something genuinely beautiful about watching a British reporter get hired to cover American sports, smile warmly through an entire explanation, and then confidently summarize it completely wrong. "Alright, so it's the best of four." No. It is not the best of four. It was never the best of four. And yet the energy in that room remains completely unbothered, because at some point the conversation pivoted to having a laugh and getting some exercise, which, honestly, is a more defensible philosophy than anything ESPN has aired in the last decade.
The Romans had a word for this kind of confident wrongness: they called it auctoritas, the weight of presence that convinces a room you know what you are talking about before the facts have had a chance to catch up. Julius Caesar walked into the Senate with auctoritas. Cicero built entire careers on it. The British reporter who just told a basketball arena full of professionals that the playoffs are "about the exercise" is operating in that exact same tradition, just with a better headband.
What makes this funnier is that American sports media has spent fifty years building an elaborate cathedral of statistics, analytics, and terminology precisely so that nobody could walk in and reduce it to vibes. And yet here we are. One patterned jacket, one breezy confidence, and the entire edifice collapses into "having a laugh.
The prank is that every empire eventually imports talent from its former rivals, and the talent arrives with its own entirely different set of priorities.
#AncientRome #HistoryRepeats #HumanNature
When the Mentorship Gets Too Formal
There is something deeply, almost painfully accurate about this clip. Two people in a vintage television studio, one asking to be taught how to be a menace, the other accepting the commission with the stiff courtesy of a board meeting. The thank yous and you're welcomes loop into infinity, which is exactly how institutional menace works: it never ends, it just gets more polished.
Rome had a word for this kind of arrangement: the clientela. A patron would extend his influence, his knowledge, his network, to a client, and in return the client would offer loyalty, labor, and the perpetuation of the patron's power. The whole Roman Republic ran on this engine. The menace was not the individual, it was the system of obligation they agreed to maintain together, with perfect manners, every single morning in the forum.
What makes this particular exchange so precise is the formality. The Greeks called it paideia, the deliberate transmission of culture and behavior from one generation to the next. But paideia was never neutral. You were always being trained to serve something, an empire, an ideology, a class, and the curriculum was just polished enough that you did not notice you were being shaped until you were already fully formed and deeply useful to someone else's agenda.
The prank is that we still call it mentorship, still dress it in blazers and red notebooks, still thank each other with such sincerity, as if the thing being passed down is wisdom rather than a very efficient method for keeping the machine running exactly as it was designed to run.
#RomanHistory #HumanNature #BreadAndCircuses
The Business Plan No One Asked For: Part 4
In 2014, comedian Nathan Fielder opened "Dumb Starbucks Coffee" in Los Angeles, a pop-up that used parody law as its entire legal defense and somehow pulled it off. The shop was empty, then it was packed, then it was on the morning news, then Fox News anchors were debating it with full chyrons and studio lighting. A guy wrote "Larry" on a cup, called it art, and the entire media apparatus treated it like a geopolitical event.
The Romans had a concept called "spectaculum," the idea that the spectacle itself was the point, that the crowd gathering was the product being sold. Fielder did not sell coffee. He sold the experience of being inside a joke that the whole city was watching unfold in real time. Nathan, in this context, is less a comedian and more a latter-day Roman aedile, staging public theater under the technical cover of civic function, knowing full well the crowds would come because crowds always come when something feels both absurd and slightly forbidden.
What makes this particularly sharp is that parody law, the legal shield Fielder hid behind, is itself a Roman concept in origin. The Romans understood that mockery of power required formal protection, which is why satirists like Juvenal and Lucilius wrote under the cover of "satira," a protected literary form. Fielder just translated that into a storefront on Hillhurst Avenue with a green logo and slightly wrong fonts.
The prank is that Starbucks, a corporation worth over a hundred billion dollars, was briefly outmaneuvered by a man with a printer, a lease, and a working knowledge of intellectual property law. The empire blinked first.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #CorporatePranks #ThePrank #HistoryRepeats
The MVP of Deflection
There is a special kind of confidence required to mispronounce "MVP" as "MP3" on camera and then immediately pivot to insulting Canada's grasp of the English language. The man in the gold jacket and olive headband does not flinch, does not correct himself, does not even acknowledge the chasm between what he said and what he meant. He simply redirects the pressure outward, and somehow, it almost works.
The Romans had a name for this exact social technology: it was called captatio, the art of seizing the rhetorical moment before your opponent can define it. Julius Caesar was a master of it. When cornered by a question he could not answer, he did not fumble, he reframed the entire premise of the conversation until the questioner forgot what they had originally asked. The man in this clip is running a variation of that same play, roughly two thousand years later, in a basketball arena with worse lighting.
What makes it genuinely funny is that the interviewer, Steve Nash, is Canadian and politely correct, which only deepens the absurdity. Steve Nash won back-to-back MVP awards. He knows what the acronym means. And yet here we are, watching someone confidently explain to a two-time MVP that no, actually, the award is called the MP3.
The prank is that incompetence with enough swagger behind it becomes indistinguishable from authority. Caligula understood this. So did half the emperors who followed him. The gold jacket was always the point.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #HumanNature
When HR Makes You Do the Interview
There is something uniquely soul-crushing about the HR-mandated job interview, and this vintage clip captures it with surgical precision. Watch the woman's face cycle through every stage of corporate grief in real time: polite engagement, barely concealed exhaustion, and the hollow smile of someone performing enthusiasm for a role they were probably already promised to someone else. The clipboard, the green curtains, the beige suit, it all reads less like an interview and more like a tribunal dressed up in mid-century office furniture.
Rome understood this theater better than anyone. The cursus honorum, the formal ladder of Roman public offices, was technically a meritocratic system, but in practice the outcome was decided long before the vote. Senators already knew who would be consul. The forum was the clipboard. The speeches were the interview. The whole performance existed to give institutional legitimacy to a decision the patrician class had already made over dinner.
The British civil service of the 19th century perfected the same ritual, wrapping aristocratic favoritism in the language of competitive examination. You could sit the test, pass with distinction, and still watch the position drift quietly toward someone whose father played cards with the department head. The structured interview is just that tradition wearing a lanyard and calling itself modern HR policy.
The prank is that we built entire departments, entire frameworks of behavioral competency questions and scoring rubrics, specifically to make the predetermined feel procedural. She already knows. He already knows. The clipboard is just a prop in a play that ended before the curtain went up.
#BreadAndCircuses #RomanHistory #TheRatRace
The Business Plan No One Asked For Part 3
A man in a green apron and a Starbucks cap stands behind the counter and, with full sincerity, asks two business casual strangers whether they have a license to sell food and drinks. He then leans in and starts pressing them on accountability, on what happens if the food is dirty, on who exactly is responsible when things go wrong. The customers sit there, composed, apparently unsure whether they are being pranked or audited by the most passionate shift supervisor in corporate history.
Here is what makes this so perfectly absurd: Rome had the exact same energy. The aediles, the magistrates responsible for public markets and food quality in the Roman Forum, were notorious for showing up to stalls and interrogating vendors on the legitimacy of their weights, their licenses, and the freshness of their goods. The difference is that the aedile had actual imperium behind him. This guy has a Starbucks apron and a dream.
What the prank reveals, though, is genuinely interesting. We have built an entire civilization on the assumption that someone, somewhere, is enforcing the rules. The Roman Republic had real mechanisms for that, tribunes, censors, aediles, a whole bureaucratic organism designed to hold power accountable. What we have is a franchise employee asking seated customers to justify their existence in a coffee shop, and somehow that feels just as official.
The prank is that we all kind of believe him for a second, because the uniform is enough. It always has been.
#AncientRome #BreadAndCircuses #RomanHistory