Michael Jensen

The Information-Computational Universe (ICU) is a unified theory of physics. (Ver 12.0)

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

New Ver 12.12

Information-Computational Universe: A single kernel unifies physics → QM, SM, GR, cosmology; 3-clock drift reproduces cosmic acceleration without dark energy.

Fermion & lepton mass sub-% accuracy from geometric & dynamical constraints.

https://t.co/zv61UWP6co

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

I promise that once I'm moved in and settled, I can get to work on making instructional videos on all major concepts that I've developed for the tetrahedral computational universe.

I've also made extremely non-trivial progress on a new document for the Standard Model Closure.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Okay, just need about one more month to finish Computational Chemistry. The framework for routing threads as fundamental in Chemistry, physics, and the universe is strengthening with each version.

I'm moving across the country, so it'll be a few weeks before I'm connected again.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

@grindxxx I live in Canada... just busy with packing and getting ready to move provinces. What about yourself, sir?

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Very busy with the menial & mundane, but I'll release an update on computational chemistry before May.

Using my theory, I've created primitive software that can predict new battery chemistries & baseline existing ones.

In 3 - 4 months I'll be back to more frequent updates.

Ty

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Using my Information-Computational Chemistry theory, a small piece of code takes a fraction of a second to find the most robust materials for superconductivity.

Niobium is essentially unbreakable. Tin is a little sensitive.

My code has no knowledge of chemistry or materials!

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Visualize an atom as information packets traffic traveling from the nucleus until they make a connection (bond), or return trip (repulsion).

Without solving any wave functions, #chemistry is emergent!

Those traffic dynamics perfectly map to a new table of Computational Matter.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

100%.

We can now model matter as 100% deterministic, sub-quantum, and computable. V0.1 was heuristic, V0.2 is explicit mechanism.

I'm writing V0.2 for immediate application in batteries, energy production, superconductivity, and magnetism. 4-5 days.

Physics & chemistry merge.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Getting close.

In Ver 0.2 of Information-Computational Chemistry, I'll demonstrate how clear regimes appear based on Quantum Traffic Dynamics!

(Nash Equilibrium-ish)

This network traffic & collisions (repulsions) in the voxel substrate accurately predict molecular geometry!

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Information-Computational Chemistry Ver 0.1.

97%+ molecular geometry accuracy across 100+ molecules, with no wavefunctions, orbitals, or fitted potentials.

Atoms as deterministic routers on a tetrahedral network, not as probabilistic electron clouds.

https://t.co/TMnBW60WB4

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Aiming for Sunday evening for Computational Chemistry V0.1.

The 1st regime (VSEPR / Valence geometry) is now working 100%. I've run 50-60 trials thus far. Version 0.1 documentation will show this first regime.

This is a new theory of how matter arises, and so far, it works.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

@cirnosad Yes, I've started one.

This discovery is (I think) maybe a week old. I'll have a quick and dirty paper on how to reproduce everything this Friday, or maybe thursday.

The first 3 sections (HISA + Dendritic Execution Model) were part of my ICU V12, just to get you started...

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

An sp^3 hybridized Oxygen atom.

Routing 'threads' shoot out like lightning w/ instructions to seek connections w/ other voxels.

This new atomic model successfully predicts all elements, their s,p,d,f shells, & one hundred+ simple molecules!

#particle #physics #chemistry #NASA

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

The Genesis of water.

No Schrödinger equation.

Just deterministic micro-processes, & statistically distributed outcomes.

Quantum indeterminacy isn't fundamental. It's watching a fan.

Bell assumed a single universal time ordering, but ICU-HTA demonstrates time as layered.

:)

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

The pixel of reality: A planck-scale geometric processor (voxel) produces SR, GR, time, and matter.

In V1.0 of Computational Chemistry (soon), 5 simple rules can predict hundreds of molecules (so far).

Like marbles in dimples, atoms settle into specific shapes in a voxel grid.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

My simple routing tree kernel has no chemistry or VSEPR knowledge.

I think I've derived matter. You'll be able to test-drive it yourself.

I'll try to have v1 available by this Friday. I want to get this out as quickly as possible. All code, all math, full write-up.

Wow.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

@JPKivisto In the ICU, each dimension has a refresh rate that is linked to each dimension's geometric information load. (f~1/d^y)

We live in the richest (+ slowest) informational dimension, so interaction is constrained.

All our 3d instruments are inherently too slow for interaction.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

V12:

Gravity is routing latency.

Atoms are demonstrated as deterministic search trees.

General Relativity derived from first principles.

Full code available for audit, dissection, re-assembly, & scientific development.

#Physics #Chemistry #Science

https://t.co/VRXAfSuXxH

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

Zero Quantum Mechanics is needed to form matter.

My routing tree network dynamics on a tetrahedral graph produce everything up to simple molecular interactions thus far. I'm reverse-engineering to find failures to build the algo out.

New paper incoming: Computational Chemistry!

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

@JPKivisto For more intuition, think of a Rubik's Cube & its 12 edges. Edges are geometrically less constrained, carrying less information.

2d are the flat faces+neighbors. 3d is entire cube+neighbors, w/ more info.

1d doesn't 'communicate' through 3d (Cube), only on edges or faces.

[Michael Jensen @CostOfReality]

@JPKivisto Think 1-d guitar string in 3d bulk space.

Two observers in 3d bulk space see different points on the string & label them 'particle a' and 'particle b'. One observer measures (plucks) the string, the entire mode updates instantly.

Not communication, it was never 2 objects.