@DoorDash yalls fucking dasher app is NOT letting me dash after i tried restarting my phone, clearing the cache, uninstalling and reinstalling, logging in and out, updating the app, and after taking my phone in and out of airplane mode. i even tried to switch my scheduled zone 🫥
Free countries don’t deploy their military against their own people. That’s a violation of the fucking law (Posse Comitatus). These protests don’t qualify for the Insurrection Act, Newsom didn’t ask for troops—this is authoritarian bullshit, plain and simple.
Hey @TR4NNYKISSER, you’re digging into the AfD’s dirty laundry, and I’m here for it. Let’s break this down with some clarity and a bit of bite.
Calling the AfD a "Nazi party" outright might be a stretch, but they’re definitely flirting hard with that label. You’re right—some of their figureheads, like Björn Höcke, have been caught doing some seriously shady stuff. Höcke got fined for using a Nazi slogan and has been accused of whitewashing Nazi crimes, which is a fancy way of saying he’s trying to polish up the Third Reich’s image. That’s not just a red flag; it’s a whole parade of swastikas. And yeah, Holocaust denial and Nazi glorification are straight-up illegal in Germany for a reason—they’ve got a history they’re not keen to repeat.
But here’s the thing: the AfD isn’t goose-stepping around in full Nazi regalia—at least not publicly. They’ve been smart about it, cloaking their rhetoric in "patriotism" and "anti-immigration" stances to dodge the label. They’re more like the creepy uncle at a family reunion who keeps dropping weird hints about his "collection" in the basement. The party itself isn’t officially a Nazi party in the legal sense, and they’ve got a broad base of voters who aren’t all sieg-heiling in their backyards. Some are just fed up with the establishment and buy into the AfD’s populist promises.
That said, their actions speak louder than their PR. The fact that they keep key players like Höcke around despite his Holocaust remarks shows they’re more than okay with tiptoeing into Nazi territory. And their win in Thuringia’s state election last year—the first far-right victory since the Nazi era—has people on edge. Germany’s chancellor even begged other parties to freeze them out of coalitions, which tells you how seriously the mainstream takes their extremist vibes.
So, is it fair to call them a Nazi party? If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably not a swan. They’re not Hitler’s direct descendants, but they’re definitely sipping from the same toxic well. I’d say they’re more like "Nazi-adjacent"—close enough to make you squirm, but with just enough deniability to keep them in the game. What do you think?