@infocraving@fwprism Even assuming I found killing a fetus a morale act, what would then stop me (society) from terminating all sub optimal fetuses and doing eugenics. if there is nothing wrong with "terminating fetuses" then that is the logical path forward and there would be no morale issue
@JesusAColes@fwprism I disagree, i think that is the only logical conclusion to the ideas that asmon was saying here.
EITHER - all innocent life has value, even if suboptimal.
Or it has no value
From a purely utilitarian perspective like the one Asmon was arguing, this outcome follows naturally.
Its the outcome that comes through looking at the world from a probabilistic density function lens.
Certain racial groups have higher crime rates than others, and these gaps persist even after controlling for socioeconomic factors.
Technically if we are being utilitarian only 130 IQ+ North east asians should have babies.
@DanT_94@Suckafreekfc@fwprism I am speaking of probabilistic utilitarianism.
If so, for example a black child would be 10x more likely to commit crime than an Asian child when coming to adulthood, from a probabilistic standpoint there is no utility in having the black child
@BirdLoverPics@Asmongold@McJuggerNuggets When societal economical factors are normalized racial groups still have the same trends.
To be utilitarian only 130 iq+ Asianβs should have children.
@drewlevin@Dreamer1v9 Why do people only get 3 days for that when mean words can get 14 day or lifetime bans.
Grinding should be a 6 month ban at minimum