@LoyalYashFaan @FearedBuck Bro this would be like if you broke into my house to rob me and instead of robbing me you saw my meat hanging out and me passed out. So instead of just leaving, you record me with my Johnson hanging out and pretend you're the victim.
@ANNO_EN As a long time anno fan I am sad to find myself having to choose between paying bills or buying anno. Might have to buy this one on a credit card or just wait. :'(
@NobleObamaFan08 Yeah dude wtf. Not only that but I keep hearing it has defects. Left trigger requires a lot of force to press, right bumper sticks if you press both the right trigger and the bumper at the same time, and out of the box it's set to 2GB of vram which is less than the steam deck.
@Grummz apples to oranges comparison. there was no widespread gloating or people saying "this is good" to melissa hortman and mark hortman's death, but in the case of charlie kirk, people celebrating his death is extremely widespread and that's just messed up and wrong.
Yes. Mental instability. Yet you're asking the wrong question. Why does he have mental instability? Is it because he spent all of his time and energy trying to change things and ultimately realizing that the system is so corrupt it's beyond redemption? You dont think that would make anyone mentally unstable? The man found out the system is beyond salvation and he keeps bouncing back and forth between challenging the powers that can ruin him and rolling over and playing dead. He stands so much to lose. We have the choice between a person who is at least willing to stand up against the corruption on all sides of the political spectrum, versus everyone else who would rather become part of that corruption. If that doesnt make a person unstable, I don't know what would. Throw elons aspbergers into the mix and you have yet another variable that makes him hard to understand. Yet despite all of the bouncing back and forth, he is the only one trying to fundamentally change our 2 party system and he just might be able to pull it off. Despite me being hyper critical of Elon and wishing he'd just go back to his companies, he's the only one who stands a realistic chance of changing things.
So if Elon is successful, his nefarious plans worked, and it can't possibly because he had to distance himself from Trump in order to save his companies? Meanwhile, Elon drives a wedge between Trump and the people, attempts to stop bills from being passed, threatens members of congress for voting for trumps bills, and the list goes on. All for what? Plausible deniability? In order to believe your theory, I have to believe about 20 unprovable things, each one highly impractical. @grok, is there any truth to what he's saying?