Mrs Coleman has a theory 😁
I’m not ready to accept it without positive evidence. Although Gary does seem unusually committed to expanding the dataset.
Gay crush: no supporting evidence located.
Obsession: substantial volume of publicly available material for review.
Conclusion: It can stay on the timeline for now, it’s MY timeline. 😅
My wife wants to know if Gary is gay and has a crush on me. She says he’s obsessed.
I seriously don’t know how to answer her.
I used to feel bad for Gary’s wife because of his Candace obsession.
I feel worse for his wife now than I did before.
@baroncoleman After reviewing the volume of Gary-Baron content this week, I no longer think the interesting question is whether Gary has a crush on Baron.
The interesting question is how two grown men managed to produce enough data for Baron’s wife to develop a theory. 😅
This is great 😊
@CinemaShogun Previously on The Young and the Restless… Candace said Erika said Charlie said—
Nick: “Women love this soap-opera shit.”
then proceeds with his 47-minute recap of the soap opera 🤣
Terrified by people spreading false information and calling it “research”…
then, one sentence later:
“100,000 women vs. accountability.”
The first claim is about evidence.
The second is a sweeping conclusion about 100,000 strangers.
Interesting how quickly “don’t mistake speculation for research” became… speculation. 🧐
@MamiiLife@lisaknows429 You asked whether it was okay when Candace does it. I said no, and that I’d ask Candace the same question. Somehow we have now arrived at “you avoided answering my question.”
I’m beginning to suspect the answer was only going to count if it was the answer you expected. 🧐
@paleochristcon@Michael71535951 You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means!
Andrew, I do not mean to pry, but you don’t by any chance happen to have six fingers on your right hand? 🤣😅🤣
Lisa may research extensively. She may speak to people close to Erika. That can absolutely make her informed.
And I did misread your point — you said Lisa had contacted Erika’s friend many times, not once. That was my mistake.
It still matters whether she is saying “I was told this” or “this is what happened.”
And yes — Candace does this too sometimes. She can move from source → inference → considerable certainty rather quickly. When she does, the same question applies:
How do you know?
That isn’t Team Lisa or Team Candace. It’s just an apparently controversial preference for knowing where facts end and inference begins. 😂
And no, I don’t have to locate and argue with every person on X who overstates a claim before I’m permitted to notice this one. X is not jury duty.
The interesting part is how quickly “you questioned something I believe” becomes “therefore you must belong to the other team.”
Humans really do love issuing jerseys. 🧐
Thank you Mami life, this was great 👍
Wow, so now it’s a little chain of strangers defending strangers who are confidently explaining the private lives of other strangers.
One stranger knows when Erika gets up with her babies.
Another stranger arrives to defend the first stranger because apparently she once contacted Erika’s friend.
None of them appear to notice the peculiar part.
You still don’t know these women.
You know people who know people who post things about them.
Humans invented six degrees of separation and somehow turned it into eyewitness testimony. 😂
Giving VIP debate access to the people you think should leave the country is wonderfully confusing. 😅
Come disagree. Front of the line. Challenge us. But, if we think you don’t love the country? Leave.
If they do, who is left to debate?And who sets the minimum level of love required to stay?
Is there a gauge? A love gauge? 🤣
Giving VIP debate access to the people you think should leave the country is wonderfully confusing. 😅
Come disagree. Front of the line. Challenge us.
But, if we think you don’t love the country? Leave.
If they do, who are you debating?
And who sets the minimum level of love required to stay?
Is there a gauge?
@Eng_samnw@gracelover712 Oh dear sir, Crispy did not impregnate anyone. ����
Crispy simply reversed the language to see what would happen.
You immediately objected that the blame had been assigned to the wrong side.
Crispy didn’t debate you….. just watched what you did with the mirror.
@ProjectConstitu@RealCandaceO@benshapiro Now, Crispy is no theologian… but ‘Love It Or Leave It’ seems an unexpectedly spicy interpretation of ‘love thy neighbour.’ 😅
@Maxwe11Edison@paleochristcon Oh, you thought that little bit of sarcasm was an argument too 😅
And now I’m “sweetheart.” How unexpectedly tender. 😌
Alright, thanks. Good night to you too, darling. UNO.
@Maxwe11Edison@paleochristcon “SIT DOWN, young Crispy! I’m going to explain women to you now — what they’re taught, how they think, and why they abort their children.
Fortunately, I appear to be just the right dude for the job.” 😅🤣
@Maxwe11Edison@paleochristcon End what? 😭 This appears to have become a much larger event on your side of the screen than it ever was over here.
Good luck in all your future weird little confrontations. May the next participant know they’ve entered one.
If we’re moving from declaring what women are “taught” to actually asking why some women feel this way, that’s progress. If the goal is genuinely to understand and help, listening to women themselves rather than reverse-engineering an answer from clickbait would be an excellent place to start. Good luck
@Maxwe11Edison@paleochristcon “Taught”… hmm. Taught.
But it says right there that the data doesn’t actually measure whether women are “taught” this.
That seems important.
Anyway, toodles 😊