@genXcessive@Grownded There are still three distinct churches. Regardless of similarities, there is enough difference and variation in practice and ordinance that produced three separate orgs.
Otherwise, they'd simply be one single church with the same everything everywhere. Just as He instituted.
@benjamincowen@martypartymusic@benjamincowen promotes objective analysis, everyone else is just clickbait to generate revenue on x.
This is another exhibit of evidence that the bear thesis is cool now that the price is capitulating.
Thanks @benjamincowen for being one of the few true minds here.
@genXcessive@Grownded If one chooses to go to a specific church within the “assembly” because that specific church aligns with his beliefs more than any other church within that same assembly, then it is not the same church. They are divided on various matters, ordinances, and doctrines.
@genXcessive@Grownded So, wide is the gate then?
Because they all teach various doctrines and follow various interpretations of the His word. Which one teaches His doctrine and receives His word as He spoke it when He established His church, and as He speaks today?
@J_McClane12@PeacemakingSt Which political party doesn't "support or promote any teachings, practices, or doctrine contrary to those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints"?
@J_McClane12@PeacemakingSt Can you say with certainty before the Lord that you're not one of the members who supports a political party that operates in opposition to the principles of His restored gospel?
@SmartTake91045@Sheum_Search But the definition of liberal still stands. The founding fathers were liberals. Just because culture tries to destroy definitions doesn't mean we must accept their revisions nor abide by them.