Why AI Should Have to Buy Shares of YOUR Future Labour.
Eric Weinstein’s Coasian Labour Shares (a market fix far better than UBI)
Core idea: Every person owns a divisible property right in their own future labour capacity — call it your personal “labour pie.”
1/9 🧵”
A Restore Britain Government will aim to prosecute officials and politicians who knowingly placed dangerous third world savages in our communities.
This will apply retrospectively.
A great number of people will go to prison for what has been inflicted on our communities.
@_Hels_@PositivFuturist A permanent state of emergency provides perfect ongoing justification for expanded executive powers, reduced accountability, and accelerated surveillance or the digital Panopticon. The proles will ultimately crave their solution.
@askeletalghost The climate is too temperate and lovely ppl live there. A nice freezing treeless windswept hellscape would be perfect. Nothing to built a ralf with, just concrete infrastructure and live stream it for our entertainment 😀
This is not censorship.
It’s “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach” done right. Originators get graceful control over conversation quality without blanket bans.
This builds directly on X’s existing infrastructure and could ship as an opt-in Premium+ feature called “Goodwill Mode.”
A practical step forward?
What already exists on X:
• Reply controls (Verified only, Following only)
• Safety Mode (auto temporary blocks on abusive patterns)
• TweepCred + reputation-based downranking
• One-tap Block/Mute + reports
• Advanced anti-spam and cluster detection
These help, but still leave too much manual work for power users.
How it works:
• Good-faith users never burn tokens → full visibility forever in protected threads
• Drive-by trolls and bots burn through their pool quickly → automatically throttled or hidden
Backed by multi-layered automation: graph-based cluster detection, behavioral patterns, creation friction, and velocity checks.
Caveat: Sophisticated Sybil farms could still rotate fresh accounts. Stronger creation costs + detection are essential. No system eliminates every bad actor, but this meaningfully raises their cost.
High-value users like Eric Weinstein are right to highlight this problem.
Constant low-effort harassment (anonymous slurs, repetitive attacks, bot noise) wastes significant time on manual blocks and mutes. Creators shouldn’t have to spend 20-30% of their platform time on this friction.
We need a better way to reduce noise while keeping X maximally open.
Ya know, I just don’t want to deal with this. In the age of @grok and AI, how hard is it to get a button so that 30% of my time on this platform isn’t manually blocking bot-level anonymous hate??
Why doesn’t this exist @grok? It’s not a point. An argument. An exchange of ideas.