An ordinary Indian, proud Hindu and Humanitarian. Believe in Congress philosophy. Will never vote for BJP. If u like my tweets, Retweet. Trolls Beware.
This gets worse.
So not only did the US Navy fire two missiles and kill three Indian sailors they refused to rescue the 24 Indian crew despite saying they are on fire, the vessel is sinking and that they are an all Indian crew.
The Omanis rescued them.
अभी खबरें आई शुरू ही हुई थी।
लोग सबूतों के साथ बात कर रहे थे कि बंगाल के नतीजों में सब कुछ उतना पारदर्शी नहीं है जिसका दावा किया जा रहा था।
कि अचानक इस्तेमाल की गई ईवीएम मशीनों में आग लग गयी।
@navikakumar@thevirdas I agree with Arnab on this. She, indeed, is kachra.
Don't really understand how unskilled, brainless people like her rise to the top.
For those who, despite being informed of the unequivocal legal position and the facts of the case, persisted in claiming that cognizance had been taken against @MNatarajanINC before the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally:
1️⃣ The very same court has now categorically held that no criminal case is pending against Ms. Meenakshi Natarajan. Further, it has observed that it lacked the jurisdiction to proceed in the matter in the first place.
2️⃣ Mr. Arvind Sharma, the Returning Officer, is also the Principal Secretary, @MPVidhanSabha. By virtue of his sheer experience, he should have known the rudimentary principles of law.
3️⃣ How bizarre is the operative portion of the order passed by the Returning Officer (copy attached)!
He appears unable to distinguish between a mandatory notice issued under the first proviso to Section 223(1) of the BNSS - merely an opportunity of being heard to the person against whom a complaint has been made - and a summons issued after cognizance has been taken by a court. The picture of the notice itself expressly mentions Section 223, leaving little room for ambiguity.
4️⃣ Even more astonishing is the apparent inference that because Ms. Meenakshi Natarajan responded to the notice, she somehow admitted the complaint. A reply to a statutory notice is nothing more than an exercise of the right to be heard; it is neither an admission of allegations nor proof that cognizance has been taken.
5️⃣ The subsequent finding of the court itself, that no criminal case was pending against Ms. Natarajan and that it lacked jurisdiction to proceed, completely exposes the fallacy underlying the reasoning adopted while rejecting her nomination.
6️⃣ The order passed by Mr. Arvind Sharma is so manifestly perverse that one is tempted to infer that it may have been influenced by political pressure or perhaps by expectations of a post-retirement plum assignment. The reasoning is difficult to comprehend otherwise.
One of my IAS colleagues remarked, only half in jest: "If even High Court judges have started joining political parties immediately after retirement, how can one blame a middle-level government officer for thinking about his future?" 😀
Whether one agrees with the quip or not, the episode underscores a larger concern: public confidence in institutional impartiality suffers whenever decisions appear to depart so starkly from settled law and established facts.
अमरीका ने चार दिन में हिंदुस्तान के तीन जहाज़ों पर हमला किया, बिना चेतावनी दिए, और हमारे कई नागरिकों को मार दिया। फिर भी मोदी सरकार चुप्पी साधे हुए हैं!
अमेरिका ने 3 भारतीयों की हत्या कर दी और अब मोदी सरकार को धमकाया भी जा रहा है।
अमेरिकी विदेश मंत्री मार्को रूबियो ने मोदी सरकार के विदेश मंत्री को चेतावनी देते हुए कहा 👇
• अमेरिकी सेना के 'आदेशों का पालन' करना होगा
• आदेशों का पालन न करना 'बर्दाश्त नहीं किया जाएगा'
ये भाषा उस देश की है, जिसने अभी-अभी 3 भारतीयों की हत्या की है। इस भाषा में ना कोई संवेदना है, ना पश्चाताप है, ना ही माफी है।
सबसे शर्मनाक तो ये है कि मोदी सरकार के विदेश मंत्री ये सुनते रहे और हो सकता है कि फोन पर 'Yes Sir-Yes Sir' भी कह रहे हों।
कहां तक हमें अमेरिका से माफी की मांग करनी चाहिए थी, उल्टा अमेरिका हमें ही हड़का रहा है।
आज अमेरिका की इतनी हिम्मत इसलिए हो रही है, क्योंकि मोदी पूरी तरह से compromised हैं।
मोदी की इसी कमजोरी का खामियाजा देश भुगत रहा है।
Breaking down US statement, that marks an escalation over the issue of 3 Indian seafarers being killed by US Navy, here's what it says:
1. Vessels must comply with US orders (Why?)
2. US forces are seeking to uphold peace and security( By shooting unarmed ships?)
3. In the Strait (But US ships are in the Gulf of Oman)
4. Violations of US Blockade ( which have been many)
5. Illicit transport of Iranian oil (Not according to international law, and US sanctions are only punitive economically)
6. Won't be tolerated (Regardless of loss of lives, or contravening international law)
Awaiting MEA response.
https://t.co/iSaCjKJU5F
Drop everything and listen in to 9.45 minutes of Leader of Opposition @RahulGandhi ji’s speech delivered at the INDIA bloc meeting on June 8th
“The Congress Party is a resistance movement protecting the idea that all Indians are equal.
If political parties can’t function, what functions? Resistance functions. Resistance works. Wherever we resist, it works.
I have seen it with my own eyes. I have walked 4,000 kilometres across this country - resistance works. You don't need political architecture. You don't need the bureaucracy. You don't need the intelligence agencies. You need the act of resistance — meaning: I will resist. I will not allow injustice. Full stop, the end. It is a spirit. It is not an organisation. It is a way of thinking - that is where we have to go.”
शिवानंद चौरसिया मेरे शहर के थे। ओमान को खाड़ी में अमरीकी हमलों में मारे जाने वालों में से एक। उनकी पत्नी का विलाप हृदयविदारक है।
एक विदेशी चैनल पहुँच गया वहाँ, देशी चैनल अबतक PM का कार्यकाल गिनने में व्यस्त हैं।
अब लाल आँखें कौन दिखाएगा? क्या इसके बाद प्रधानमंत्री मोदी G7 की बैठक में जाएंगे? उन्हें बोल देना चाहिए कि इंडिया में राम मंदिर के चढ़ावे में डकैती हो गई है और नीट परीक्षा का पेपर लीक हो गया है, हम दोनों मॉनिटर कर रहे हैं, इसलिए G7 की बैठक में नहीं आएंगे। इस बयान के बाद कैसे जाएंगे?
India should have demanded – and received – an unconditional apology for the killing of three young Indian sailors in an American military strike.
Instead, Secretary Rubio reportedly chose to issue a warning, declaring that failure to comply with the orders of the U.S. military “will not be tolerated.” That is the language of command, not contrition.
There was no acknowledgement of the lives lost, no acceptance of responsibility, and no apology.
What makes the episode even more embarrassing was New Delhi’s response. Rather than calling the strike what it was, the External Affairs Minister merely observed that lethal actions against commercial shipping are “not justified.”
“Not justified”? That is the phrase you use for an overpriced airport sandwich, not for a military strike that kills civilians.
The appropriate words for America's actions are: illegal, reckless, and unacceptable. Instead, we got the kind of carefully sterilised euphemism that manages to offend no one – except the families of the dead.
Yes, "professional journalism" requires this to be done.
In fact, the source is pseudo-media backed by the Zionist regime, functioning as its propaganda arm. Iran has designated it a terrorist organization for "inciting violence" and "supporting separatist and terrorist groups."
He says he has a video of the interview that Jashoda Ben, (PM Modi’s wife) gave to Zee TV.
He says he has also recorded a dying declaration.
Jashoda Ben and her brothers were pressurised to never talk to media, he says.
Why did PM Modi not reveal that he was married to Jashoda Ben⁉️
Could this be true, that he hid facts⁉️
Another video here is that where PM Modi’s Affidavit before filing his candidature is displayed where he has hidden facts of his spouse. Doesn’t that amount to hiding facts⁉️
How can there be two set of rules, one for PM Modi and another for leaders of the Opposition⁉️
Is this not gross unfair and misuse of power⁉️
India wants to know, why is everything about our PM is so suspicious ⁉️