One of the ‘trans women’ openly boasting about going to the women’s pond and defying the law last week included Sarah Jane Baker, a man who served 30 years for kidnap and torture.
This is who the GLP fights for…
It is now verified that the event was marketing properties in illegal settlements. I presume you will now be retracting this statement, apologising, and condemning the synague for hosting the event.
There is now clear evidence that the Great Israeli Real Estate event had unlawful activity at it.
I've written to the Mayor of London to ask what he intends to do about it.
This needs to be escalated immediately.
Ma, momma, mommy are universal words because it's one of the easiest things for a baby to say, and because babies and mothers form a powerful bond.
Taking babies from their mothers disrupts their psychological development. Being offended by that fact makes you a selfish pr*ck.
I think the shower scene in Psycho is one of the most disturbing in cinema history. The way that horrible Terf screams as soon as she sets eyes on that brave Trans woman left me literally shaking.
As the UK emerges from its long decade of gender induced madness, I think it’s worth remembering that the man who wrote this now works for the government.
Matt Thompson is now employed by @GalopUK, the government funded LGBTQ+ charity that defines “asking a trans person upsetting questions” as a hate crime. Mr. Thompson’s position is listed as “Transphobic Hate Crime Advocate.”
In a country where ordinary people struggle to pay the bills, and housing is all but unaffordable, perhaps it is not in taxpayers’ best interests for their government to be shelling out £4.5 million yearly to keep Galop going (including £33,291/year to compensate Mr. Thompson for his “work”), given they have had to resort to listing “upsetting questions” as a hate crime in order to justify their continued existence.
https://t.co/m5pg8sEOp5
Rendering this Country into an inhabitable Fascist Shit Hole, just so Israel can continue to eat its way through humanity & the planet, without consequence. Fucking shameful.
This might sound cynical but I sometimes wonder if the wealthy have, behind doors, realized that the climate is destroyed, and, as a result, started deliberately creating the conditions that will cull the population through war, famine, pestilence, while hoarding resources for themselves and their offsprings.
Gosh.
Whatever could’ve contributed to such mistrust of news / courts /police reporting / NHS / mainstream media when they’re writing phrases like “exposed her penis” and calling violent criminals & dirty old men “she” and “her” as if we don’t have eyes? 🤔
Starmer: We want to digitally ID everyone who uses social media
Brits: Absolutely Not!
Starmer: OK then, we want to ban under 16s from social media (by digitally ID-ing everyone)
Brits: OMG that’s a great idea. Idk what idiot would be against that 🥴
I don't mean to sound hysterical, but it's exceedingly obvious that the social media ban, the PA proscription, and the assisted dying bill are all unified moves by a government with no intention of bettering people's lives, only snuffing out dissent.
I don’t think politicians understand how different life is for teenagers now.
This generation already got hit with lockdowns, missed school years, cancelled exams, isolation, anxiety, and watching their parents struggle through a cost of living crisis. A lot of them lost confidence socially before they’d even had a chance to grow up properly.
Now the answer is to ban them from social media?
I get the concerns. There’s obviously toxic stuff online. But acting like taking social media away suddenly fixes teenage mental health feels completely out of touch.
For loads of teenagers, being online isn’t just “scrolling”. It’s where their friendships are. Their humour. Music. Football clips. Investing education. Group chats. Communities. Even support when home life isn’t great.
Adults created these platforms. Adults made them addictive. As adults we sit on our phones all day too. But somehow teenagers are the problem?
And realistically, loads of kids will get around the ban within a day anyway. Fake birthdays, VPNs, second accounts, it’ll happen instantly. So who actually gets punished? Mostly normal kids who follow rules.
Instead of bans, why not:
Force tech companies to clean up algorithms,
invest properly in mental health support,
teach kids how to use social media safely and help parents understand the online world better.
Teenagers already feel unheard half the time. Policies like this just make it worse.
You can’t keep taking things away from young people and calling it protection.
Give the kids a break! Atleast open some youth clubs or something 🤷🏾♂️