@x3ideRaven Can confirm. Have squatted in China. Also a good idea to bring your own paper because it's often not supplied. Unless you'd like to grab a piece of used paper from the basket next to you!
@bobo_crypto21 @rajkumarbas11@RobbieSnipe@Kavaskous@osmosis@CrescentHub@nomicbtc A fee is deducted from the amt when making a transaction, but there are 0 gas fees to make a TX. So as long as the amount you're trying to move is more than .01 $NOM, you should be able to claim (.02 to claim & stake). If you see gas fees, remove/re-add the chain in Keplr to fix.
@gadikian@JunoNetwork Leaning towards NWV due to spammy-ness and previous actions. This is throwing whatever he can to get anything but burn to stick. Even if there is a small spark of compromise in there. Not like we have line-item veto.
@gadikian@JunoNetwork I've said IF there's no burn, an audited dist to the investors would be preferable. & rather than bribe the community with 50% of the funds, they should go to a DISINTERESTED 3rd party auditor. NOT one picked by CCN. Inclusion of a cpl agreeable points doesn't earn a yes. No/NWV
@GoldenStaking That said, would still prefer a burn. But if that does not happen, CCN has earned the distrust of the community several times over, and does not deserve any benefit of the doubt.
@GoldenStaking Agreed that any compromise should require the funds be in a smart contract. But if "half the funds" go anywhere, it should be towards an auditor who is tasked with confirming/planning the distribution of the investors' tokens. Not to buy votes from the community.