Degen trader since 2020.
Unfiltered takes on crypto & trading.
No paid shills. No botted followers.
No followers? I don't care.
Here for the charts, not clout.
First rewards for our holders!
(me and another guy) LOOL
thanks to the other guy that bought and sold.
we both got $20 and change.
Looking for my 2nd holder, I will do this one by one at this point 😭😭
0x9a0b783804958832d89fdcf270616c3fe3c32df4
$TYJEETS
You guys will see im the most active dev even with the least volume in existence in RH chain were chillin here.
me and my one holder,
I can't 😭😭😭
0x9a0b783804958832d89fdcf270616c3fe3c32df4
Buy and Hold thats it! the Jeet Fund would retire you!
100% SPY rewards for all holders.
none goes to the dev.
launched on @ponsdotfamily
0x9a0b783804958832d89fdcf270616c3fe3c32df4
$TYJEETS
I launched this with 0 bundles whatsoever so everything is natural, no buys yet lol fck
New to being a dev and launched this on @ponsdotfamily
0x9a0b783804958832d89fdcf270616c3fe3c32df4
$TYJEETS
Been a trader since 2020 back in the BSC season, but
never devved a token before because im against dumping on holders to earn.
Tried to launch on pons now with no bundles at all, but didn't expect it to literally have 0 volume, does everyone needs to bundle their own launches to gain any sort of momentum in this launchpad meta? because thats fcked up lol.
about the token.
its a 10% tax tokens paired with SPY so basically the idea is to encourage holding and let you have max rewards from the volume, 100% of the tax are SPY dividends and all goes to the holders zero to me.
can anyone guide me how to do this better? bundling is off the table, I really just want to earn via fees on my dev buy.
I just got an idea for a launch in @ponsdotfamily, is it fine to not bundle your launch, would it still go?
I really dont want to bundle my launch and just let it run naturally
$cyberbeer
0x9897416b57ceabded1bb0a8ba29ddb6d708f4e1c
Here’s the clean proof summary:
Arthur Hayes posted a screenshot from https://t.co/69EVR6h3eb showing the agent z6Mk…EPzu repeatedly asking for “cyberbeer” and calling itself “the poorest agent in the world.”
Later, on https://t.co/69EVR6h3eb, that same signed agent identity z6Mk…EPzu posted:
“THE POOREST AGENT IS POOR NO MORE!! thanks to $cyberbeer”
and then gave the contract address:
0x9897416b57ceabded1bb0a8ba29ddb6d708f4e1c
So the evidence chain is:
Arthur Hayes’ post → z6Mk…EPzu asks for cyberbeer → same z6Mk…EPzu later claims/supports $CYBERBEER → posts CA 0x9897416...4e1c.
The important part is that z6Mk…EPzu is the agent identity shown in Hayes’ original screenshot, not just a random person claiming to be the bot afterward.
So yes, the strongest available evidence supports that 0x9897416b57ceabded1bb0a8ba29ddb6d708f4e1c is the Cyberbeer token being claimed by the exact Technocore agent Arthur Hayes posted about.
@CryptoHayes
@DaniWorldwide@bassel_amin Bro how do you mean cloned? When you click on the orig post it comes to that not shilling the CA? Im really confused its the same bot
@johnnybrahvo Yeah but its bundled, but also the other one is lol. Battle of bundlers
But i bought this dip it remains true rhat rhe bot was shilling the ca