Litecoin should not still be here.
It launched in 2011, watched thousands of flashier coins promise to replace it, and quietly buried almost all of them.
The survivor everyone wrote off is about to do the one thing nobody expected.
In this conversation, Roc and Aztec of LitVM walk through a major expansion that finally brings smart contracts to one of crypto's oldest names.
Their argument is that the recent downturns, which they attribute to predatory shorting, are masking a quieter trend, with capital steadily rotating back into proven legacy assets that have already weathered more than a decade of cycles.
The project itself is a purpose-built layer-two (L2) modular stack that brings Ethereum Virtual Machine compatibility natively to Litecoin.
They point out that while the major chains support dozens of layer twos, LitVM is the only one building on Litecoin, using zero-knowledge cryptography to let users launch smart contracts and real-world assets trustlessly.
Here is the part that should make you pay attention.
With no airdrop incentives dangled in front of anyone, the testnet has already crossed 40 million transactions and 3 million unique active wallets, which means people are showing up for the technology rather than a payout.
Roc and Aztec explain what that signals, and why they believe the oldest survivor in crypto might be the one writing its most important chapter yet...
@LitecoinVM
Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the other party and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any decisions.
00:00 Mario Nawfal, Roc, and Aztec break down the current market cycle and the reasons capital is returning to legacy chains.
04:40 The founders address crypto's narrative crisis and why sovereign networks are essential against financial weaponization.
13:51 The discussion shifts to LitVM and how it delivers smart contract and EVM functionality directly to the Litecoin network.
23:14 The team elaborates on LitVM's position as Litecoin's exclusive layer two and their community-driven distribution strategy.
35:48 The founders reveal strong organic testnet numbers before Mario closes out the session.
Down $300k in Litecoin today.
Been taking a major loss so I’m quitting crypto and have officially sold all of my bags.
It’s over for me and LTC, it’s been real.
Betting massively on the rebranding of $TON to $GRAM.
I’ve been accumulating massive bags of $REDO, $UTYA, and $FROG.
Telegram’s on chain valuation is $4.6B but with their user base, they are severely undervalued.
$100B and higher for $GRAM, you’re earlier than you think.
Yea but when it ICOd before as TON, people didnt fully realize it was Telegram if they weren’t paying complete attention. Now that its becoming GRAM, everyone will know it’s Telegram’s chain. That direct correlation will be a huge aspect in its growth. Think about how many telegram users today don’t even realize their telegram has a built in wallet and native token. It’s actually wild. Extremely undervalued and will outperform ETH+SOL big time.
So in short I look at it as Telegram’s actual IPO on chain even though Ton has already been their blockchain and has a $5B valuation. $5B can easily become $100B + with all the users Telegram has. Telegram has the advantage over other L1s because of its social platform and user base.
I look at it in the aspect that Telegram will be one of the first social platforms to pretty much be tokenized fully on chain in the sense that instead of having an IPO like other massive companies and going public, theyre skipping the noise and allowing investors to invest into Telegram through “GRAM”. It was no different than TON but GRAM as the ticker will actually give the direct correlation between Telegram and it’s blockchain.
Litecoin is still on a massive uptrend regardless of the market.
Once the bleed resets the market and BTC’s $60k liquidation heatmap gets tapped, it’s up from there.
$1800-2400 is still in the works, then $12,000.
Anyone calling $TON → $GRAM “rebrand” clearly failed basic history class
This isn’t a rebrand. Telegram didn’t just wake up one morning and decide to get creative. They’re reclaiming what the SEC literally stole from them years ago . GRAM was always the name. Always the ticker. Always the endgame. What you’ve been calling $TON for few years was a survival mechanism imo
And now that Telegram is powerful enough to finish what they started, suddenly everyone has opinions.
The people screaming loudest about “community ownership” are the same people who need Telegram’s 1B MAU to make their bags worth anything. You cannot always have it both ways. You don’t get to use Telegram’s distribution as your exit liquidity and then cry about decentralization when Telegram makes a decision.
TON is the legacy. But legacy is what you try to build to survive , not just what you die protecting. $GRAM was always coming. Won’t sound like I knew , but Durov just waited until the ecosystem was strong enough to handle the truth.
The only question that matters now is embarrassingly simple:
Are you on the train or watching it leave?
the devs abandoned @KissedFrogOG
so the community took over.
in 3 days they built a website, paid dex , launched an AI bot, added liquidity, got verified on ton viewer, printed an ath, still actively cooking contents 🤯
235 followers on x in 72 hours.
190 telegram members organically.
this isn’t a project anymore.
it’s a movement , ribbit ribbit Mfkrs💋 🐸