STRC ~5% under par. @khingoei of @Treasury_BTC calls it option value, not distress. His model: 63% raise odds, 5% suspension. Yield's the real driver. @Strategy@saylor@phongle
Full breakdown: https://t.co/H4IFFKEydU
Trust isn't disappearing.
It's evolving.
For decades, institutions provided the trust layer behind financial systems.
Today, technology is introducing new ways to verify transactions, ownership, and identity.
The future may not be about replacing trust.
It may be about strengthening it.
What role do you think technology will play in building trust over the next decade?
#FutureOfFinance #DigitalTrust #Fintech #Innovation #DigitalAssets
Strategy buys another $100M as Saylor calls BTC a $100T network. The signal isn't the meme. It's that a listed company now buys on a schedule, through every dip, as policy. Treasury doctrine, not a trade. Whether it's "inevitable" is the real debate. https://t.co/LsUqRYkjRN
@BitcoinNewsCom The Metaplanet story is really an Asia-regulatory story. A Japan-listed entity building a BTC yield ecosystem only works because local rules now permit the structure — that's the part other regions should be reading, not just the holdings number.
Payroll and tokenized deposits are the quietly important use cases here. Far less hype than trading, but that's where stablecoins actually replace a slow incumbent rail. The privacy layer for enterprise flows is the piece most chains skip — how does Zones handle compliance reporting on top?
@Tokenicer Ubyx joining as a validator is the part worth watching. McLaughlin's whole RLN thesis is that stablecoins need bank-grade settlement finality to clear at institutional scale, not just speed. The validator set is where that credibility gets earned or lost — curious who joins next.
@SenseReceptor There is a real multi-trillion transfer underway, but it's generational, not engineered — boomer assets moving to a digital-native cohort that defaults to tokenized rails. That's the version actually worth tracking, and it's a lot less sinister than the framing here suggests.
What stands out isn't the size, it's that it's booked as a strategic reserve rather than a trade. Once BTC sits next to cash and treasuries on the balance sheet it stops reading as speculation. We put exactly this treasury-vs-trade line to Khing Oei at Money 20/20 — that framing shift is the real story.
@pete_rizzo_ The number everyone quotes is the price, but the real signal is who's doing the buying this cycle. Corporate treasuries and ETFs absorbing supply is a structurally different bid than the 2017 retail wave. "Inevitable" is a stretch, but the demand mix genuinely changed.
Ethereum spot ETFs took in over $101M in early June, and BlackRock alone bought ~$37M on June 8, near half that day's demand. Its iShares ETH Trust sits near $6.5B AUM. Full breakdown: https://t.co/nOmF1G3vzt
Everyone's on today's relief rally — Iran truce, BTC at a two-week high. The more durable signal is WHO is buying: ETFs net sold while treasury vehicles soaked it up. Bitmine added 76,881 ETH today on Saylor's preferred-stock playbook. https://t.co/mab6Fy4MrJ
In the last 5 weeks, the US Bitcoin ETF's on NET sold 79,284 Bitcoin.
@Strategy sold 32 Bitcoin, and accumulated 26,387 in the same horizon.
@Strategy was a net buyer of 26,355 Bitcoin, accumulating 33% of the net outflows from the Bitcoin ETF's.