Just over here waiting for all of the rich, white liberals and A-listers to come out of their million dollar homes to tell Venezuelans and Americans how they should feel about the capture of Maduro. 🙄
This woman says the quiet part out loud and speaks an uncomfortable truth. Say it louder for the people in the back!
“If the Government feeds you, it can starve you. If the Government houses you, it can evict you. If the Government pays your utilities, it can turn them off. If the Government pays your cell phone, it can disconnect it. If the Government provides your transportation, it can decide when you go and where you can travel. If the Government takes care of your health, it can decide when it has spent enough money on you. If the Government educates your children, it can choose what they learn. If the Government raises your children, it can shape what they believe. If the Government controls your information, it can control your truth.
And when a Government controls all of those things, it doesn’t have to take your freedom, you will hand it over piece by piece in exchange for comfort. You’ll think you’re being cared for, when in reality is, you’re being kept.”
Powerful words and she is 100% correct.
In the immortal words of Ronald Reagan- "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are 'I'm from the government, and I'm here to help.' "
@ChrisDJackson@JoeBiden This is hilarious! Thanks for the laugh this morning!
I still remember people losing their jobs for not taking an experimental shot under this joker! That’s authoritarianism! Joker
No Kings?
Nah… the Left just wants their King. 👑
Lockdowns.
Mask mandates.
Censorship.
Weaponized “justice.”
Political persecution.
Same Speaker for 20 years.
A presidential candidate swapped out in the dead of night — democracy ignored.
This didn’t happen under TRUMP.
It happened under “Democrat Leadership.”
Middle East peace was achieved, so the paid agitators just changed uniforms.
Different jersey, same Marxism.
They lost the House, the Senate, the Presidency, the Electoral College and the popular vote. They never got a king — they got the exact democracy they ordered.
Imagine chanting “no kings” while backing the party that crowned Kamala Harris without her earning a single vote.
The jokes write themselves. I guess kings aren’t allowed, but queens get a pass.
🚨THIS IS MY PRESIDENT!
"This is the most powerful man on the world, but yet he purposefully delayed his schedule so he could spend more time with the families of hostages, hostages who had been freed in previous deals that he supported."
He is a child of God, NO DOUBT!
Some serve a lifetime in public office and never experience a day like today.
In time history will detail the full story of how today was made possible.
But for now all Americans should at least know this, that today would not have happened without @potus doing some pretty extraordinary things.
If you watch Charlie Kirk’s debates, there’s something you’ll see in almost all of them.
It’s easy to miss until it’s pointed out to you, but once you’re aware, you’ll notice every time.
Here’s the pattern I’ve observed:
1. His first mission is to establish clarity.
- Asks his opponent to state their argument
- Asks them to define terms
- If they struggle with either, he offers one to them and asks if it’s FAIR
2. His second (and most important) mission is to find something, no matter how small, on which he can say the magical phrase:
“I AGREE”
Human beings WANT to be agreed with. It’s a fundamental drive.
It establishes rapport, and helps us feel acknowledged and humanized.
Saying “I agree” or “we agree” lowers defenses. Which is THE KEY.
Because once defenses go up, communication stops.
Charlie knew this, and it was one of his biggest strengths and secret weapons.
But he never said it insincerely. That’s why his first step was CLARIFICATION.
In order to find a sincere point of agreement, you have to understand what the other person is trying to say.
This is a known debate tactic. But even though many skilled debaters use it, few wield it in quite the same way as he did.
Why?
Because Charlie wasn’t trying to just WIN.
He was trying to CONVINCE.
He wanted the person across from him to end up BESIDE him.
Humiliation wasn’t the goal. Because a person who is simply humiliated or defeated either doubles down or shuts down and walks away.
Which is why, if you watch, you’ll see how intently Charlie hunts for the moment he can say “I AGREE”… usually even before he begins his counterattack.
He lights up with excitement every time he finds it.
Because he knew that once their perspective was entirely dismantled, they’d find themselves floating in a sea of uncertainty… and he wanted them to have a life ring to hold onto.
One that was tethered to reason, truth, and a person with whom they knew they could AGREE.
Even if only about something small.
It’s how he managed to never close the door on someone.
It’s how he so beautifully built connection during—and even THROUGH—argument.
And it’s something I think we should all notice and study, when we watch him, so that we can do it too.
Real winning is about keeping the focus on what you’re fighting FOR, rather than who you’re fighting against.
Charlie knew that.
It’s become my favorite thing to look for in his debates.
And, the more I see it… the more I feel like it’s the real key to carrying on his legacy, and picking up his mic.
Groups that have a terror problem in 2025:
SPLC
Muslims
Trans
Groups that do NOT have a terror problem in 2025:
Christians
Conservatives
MAGA
Prove me wrong.
This man has no sympathy for Illegals who are being deported under Trump
He came here on a H-1B visa as a student, he graduated..got a job and his visa expired
Went back home applied for legal status..it was granted and now he's an American citizen
This is how it's done 👇