@Mother74957710@scrowder Clearly whomever wrote this article didnât read the entire filing or is intentionally misleading the public. Read it yourself
No - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.
The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.
He actually made her point repeatedly. It just went over his head
They werenât even debating the same issue - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.
He was actually making her point but it was going over his head
The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.
I dont understand how people are missing Candaces argument - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.
Andrewâs repeated questions are actually proving her point. Itâs just going completely over his head.
The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.
Heâs actually proving her point. I think itâs going over his head
They donât seem to understand - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.
Candace and Andrew werenât even debating on the same level or issue. If anything he was actually proving her point. It was going completely over his head
@scrowder Honestly I canât say who won because I donât think they were debating the same issues. Andrew was missing the deeper point. If anything he was making Candaceâs point. If I had to pick it would have to be Candace, but they werenât debating on the same level or issue
Candace and others are just pointing out that others also have motive. Some may find those motives absurd just like some find the âfurryâ motive absurd. All we have is what we heard and seen over the years. Theres definitely a lot of strange behavior coming from people that are supposed to be friends.
The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tylerâs guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilitiesâincluding the possibility that others were involved. We donât have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. Thatâs it. Thatâs the point.