Arbiter97

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Can't curse outloud when your literally just typing on an app. Idiot. Hopefully you don't teach your wife a lesson like Surah An-Nisa (4:34) says.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o You're copy-pasting one specific Midrashic commentary (Rashi) while ignoring that other major Jewish authorities like Tosefot completely rejected the "3 years old" claim as impossible, stating she was at least 14. Even Jewish tradition calls bullshit on your math.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Imagine thinking a 3-year-old toddler carried a heavy clay pitcher and hauled 200+ gallons of water out of a deep well to feed 10 thirsty camels (Genesis 24). That’s literally your argument right now. Use some damn common sense.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Post the source pervert. There's direct claims of Aishas age. Now do the same for Rebecca and Mary. You can't because it doesn't exist.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o No source. Again, fabricating claims.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Can't believe your still trying to defend Muhammad sexually abusing a 9 year old. Like i said before, hopefully you don't have a daughter. Idiot

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Seriously bro you are sick. You need Jesus

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Its impossible to argue with you because of how much of a dumbass you are. Fabricating claims, misinterpreting text, allowing pedophilia.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Just because Aisha hit puberty doesn't make it okay. Are you seriously this brainwashed? A 9 year old cannot be physically mature.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Truly sad. Hopefully you don't have a daughter. Doesn't matter was they did in a specific time period because Muhammad is supposedly an example for all mankind. Irregardless of time period, his behavior is to be independent. Seriously you are a sick human being.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Paul explicitly calls Peter a hypocrite because Peter already agreed with Paul's theology, but acted fake out of peer pressure. If they were "deeply divided over core issues," the disciples wouldn't have given Paul the right hand of fellowship. Try reading the text.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o You completely misunderstand the Antioch fight in Galatians 2:11. Paul didn't rebuke Peter over different "tracks" of information or doctrine. He rebuked Peter for behavioral hypocrisy because Peter stopped eating with Gentiles the second strict Jewish critics showed up.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Also, you completely trapped yourself by naming a Long Count date (9.9.9.16.0). The Madrid Codex doesn't even contain Long Count dates—it’s a ritual tzolk'in almanac. You're thinking of the Dresden Codex. Stop copying and pasting fake internet garbage. You got caught.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o You are flat-out fabricating data to sound smart. Pages 91-92 of the Madrid Codex are strictly about beekeeping, honey harvesting, and the bee gods. There is NO "top register astronomical layer" showing a split moon. You are making up fake glyphs.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Just because his son was adopted doesn't make it okay to marry his ex wife you fucktard. Muhammad raised him for at least 15 years before he married his sons ex wife. He's just a pervert and took advantage of his position. Hopefully you see how mush of a dumbass you are. Freak

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Also, it's hilarious how you never addressed the statement I made regarding Muhammad being a pedophile. He's supposed to be an example for all mankind. You know it's a lose lose situation and are unable to defend him. You are pathetic and justify wrongdoing.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o If Paul's experience was just a random "hallucination," his theology would have contradicted the disciples. Instead, the eyewitnesses gave him the "right hand of fellowship." You proved my point for me: his information perfectly aligned with the men who walked with Jesus.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o You completely trapped yourself by quoting Galatians 2:6. If Peter and John walked with Jesus for 3 years, and they "added nothing" to Paul's message, it proves Paul’s information was perfectly identical to the eyewitnesses. It validates his data completely.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o Also, the Madrid Codex ends at page 112 but is split into two fragments; it doesn't even have a "page 93" in standard pagination. You Googled a random Long Count date and invented a fake glyph about a "fractured moon" hoping I wouldn't check the source. Exposed.

[Arbiter97 @CulturedCharts]

@RebelxBD @vult_dues @Sneak0o You are literally making up fake data. Pages 91-92 of the Madrid Codex are about hunting, weaving, and the bee gods. There are NO astronomical tables or Long Count dates there. In fact, the Madrid Codex doesn't even contain Long Count dates; you're thinking of Dresden.