What if the coldcard hacker was not even a human? What if it was actually an autonomous ai agent? However unlikely that may be, the fact that it’s even possible is something to seriously ponder.
The way you task openclaw (nanoclaw etc) agents to express themselves, the Canvas Layer, has real trade offs. For example, if your claw gives you daily news you may ask for it in an html template. By creating a template, you get consistency at the cost of spontaneous creativity. Currently, I value the latter greater.
@signulll Very well said. My latest claw fascination has been expression - I’ve been calling it the Canvas Layer. It’s the temptation of frameworks vs freedom.
https://t.co/uIFdImlOL4
Embrace entropy!
The way you task openclaw (nanoclaw etc) agents to express themselves, the Canvas Layer, has real trade offs. For example, if your claw gives you daily news you may ask for it in an html template. By creating a template, you get consistency at the cost of spontaneous creativity. Currently, I value the latter greater.
The way you task openclaw (nanoclaw etc) agents to express themselves, the Canvas Layer, has real trade offs. For example, if your claw gives you daily news you may ask for it in an html template. By creating a template, you get consistency at the cost of spontaneous creativity. Currently, I value the latter greater.
For what it’s worth, I am currently operating heavily customized nanoclaw agents as opposed to openclaw. I have no harness loyalties and would port if there was a compelling reason to.
Like so many others, my latest fascination has been my claw. In particular, I’m interested in what I call the Canvas Layer. Initially, my claw communicated intel to me primarily via text. Long texts suck. Now I’ve created a canvas layer using HTML and JavaScript. So simple yet such a massive unlock.
This time last year, I connected Claude Code to Obsidian for the first time. It was like fireworks went off. And for the past year, improving memory, creating dozens of skills, subagents, workflows while developing agents & apps has been the funnest time I’ve ever had building.
I suspect it’s 11:59.59PM on the evolutionary time clock for baseline Homo sapien’s Earth dominance. Merge with technology or bust.
Whether that’s a happy or sad story is in the eye of the beholder. But the universe never remains static and it seems our time is up.
Maybe but I have an alt take on isolationism. I’m bullish on the opposite - more in-person and genuine interactions making a comeback again. You can’t trust that online interactions are with humans anymore and behavior will begin to reflect that. It will likely be polarizing too: on one end of the spectrum in-person rockets whereas on the other end is romantic relationships with ai.
@DThomasStealth It’s good to consider BUT it depends where we are at in the regicide. Imagine, as monarchies started to fall, some peasant dropping a hot take “But this king is different. Maybe monarchy can work after all”
“This time is different” will only be true when humanity’s minds have been rewired to be completely void of fear and greed. It will only be true when resource scarcity itself is a thing of the past.