Cunnyseur

enjoyer of cunny

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@Arcengal @TheTrinketMage It’s IYKYK, just so you know

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@WiLLnWeLL @Kayzumaki10 So embarrassing being this defensive about something that isn’t gonna happen lmao

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@WiLLnWeLL @Kayzumaki10 Ship is great lil bro they had insane chemistry

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson It’s all retards warrant

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@mrsbeifong It’s the premise of the whole post retard

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@kataikou @mikeharmandev @PotatoMcWhiskey Deeply ironic that one of the most common and identifiable characteristics of ‘roguelikes’ as a genre is meta progression, when Rogue was a permadeath zero metaprogression game

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson Again you just repeat yourself. ‘The card isn’t powerful so it’s bad design the card is bad that’s bad design!’ There is a reason retards like you aren’t working on design.

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@mkBina_ @PaladinAshe @AkzeriuthNs The average power of a given team of random heroes in DC is just a lot higher than Marvel is what he’s saying. Also what? The celestials didn’t MAKE the infinity stones, they just deliver them

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson Yes again that’s just saying an intentional choice for power level is bad game design, because you’re a retard who wants every piece of cardboard to power reel the last piece of cardboard. You are literally just quoting yourself saying ‘this thing is bad because it isn’t strong’

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson You literally said they are badly designed because there are more powerful options and they force you to run a bad mana base. That is a level of understanding that screams ‘must be powerful to be a good design’. AKA, toddler level.

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson His point is bad, as is yours. Your understanding of design is “making the most optimally powerful game object.” Having such a retarded opinion should indeed have you prohibited from commenting on design.

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson @CococonutGun The original post didn’t say nobody should be allowed to comment on game design, just that certain people, I;e the people saying the retarded shit that should be disregarded, shouldn’t.

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson @CococonutGun I think you might be too retarded to conceptualise that sometimes a minority of your customers will complain about something that more people prefer, and in such a case, listening to them is bad. But that’s ok, not everyone is above 55 IQ points

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@BerringtonJyson @CococonutGun If WotC acted on the commentary in question the product would be worse. That’s OPs entire point. There isn’t any magical intrinsic value to a customer saying “actually 1+1 is 3!” As product feedback other than perhaps learning how dumb your customers can be

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@Brewers_Kitchen So the decks in question don’t devolve into good stuff piles? Seems to me a strictly more interesting design space than all the 5c ability tacked on commanders we’ve gotten

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@t0pvayne @graham025 @NoLifeJordan69 It wasn’t Rome’s decision at all, they couldn’t have demobilised, it would’ve just caused a civil war. Once they reached the point of complete economic reliance on war plunder to keep their army going, they were fucked no matter what.

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@t0pvayne @graham025 @NoLifeJordan69 Man pick up a book sometime. The political decay is a direct product of an enormously expensive military that had been used for critically important, profitable expansion suddenly running out of ‘barren shitholes’ to extract wealth from.

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@t0pvayne @graham025 @NoLifeJordan69 Very strange example given that as soon as Rome reached its territorial peak it increasingly and severely ate itself alive for want of plunder from the barren shitholes until eventually the barren shitholes killed it, at multiple different points

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@McSmurray @CardGameNut @SaffronOlive @Mengu09 I feel like this is the purview of the people who can vote, unless they were given specific criteria that excludes it. The impact a pro player has had via content seems a perfectly reasonable to consider, if a weaker player has gotten more players into MTG that’s relevant for HOF

[Cunnyseur @CunnyseurD]

@McSmurray @CardGameNut @SaffronOlive @Mengu09 Is that not ultimately the point of there even being a vote? If you just want it to go to the player with the most wins you shouldn’t want there to be any voting at all