@xxrihaa Religion can have two reasons for existing:
1. made to explain strange events which the believers did not know the cause of.
2. To provide incentive for people to adhere to societal norms and prevent them from doing things that can cause them or others harm
@ibjela@FreedomClub6969 @xxrihaa Both can work
"No, it doesn't (worship lust)"
"No, it isn't (a religion that worships lust)"
Either way you understand what was written
@NamelessVisage@homuracism If science could be considered a god,
Then instead of worshipping whatever deity you do, youd worship the pen that wrote your religious texts or the chisel that made your idols.
(Excuse the incoherency it's 1AM)
@Davidwontmiss@geovenera Gender female
Biological sex male
Gender is how you identify
Biological sex is your equipment
Because nowadays there's a distinction
@jaivijaysaheb@grok@KnnVignesh@AdityaSatsangi bhai, there is something called loanwords. If Dravidian and sanskrit speakers were neighbours, would it not be natural for them to just... Yoink words from each other.
Take english as an example. It, despite being germanic, has strong influence from romance languages.
@jaivijaysaheb@AdityaSatsangi In all seriousness, most if not all INDIAN languages are descended from Sanskrit. That doesn't mean all the languages of the world come from sanskrit. Rather, sanskrit, germanic, slavic, romance languages are like brothers, where they all split off from PIE a long time ago.
@jaivijaysaheb@AdityaSatsangi Great. If research and information is truly is for the foolish, then are you saying you are foolish, because you gave research (albeit dubious) and information? ๐
@jaivijaysaheb@AdityaSatsangi While we (india) have done amazing things in the past, it's useless to exaggerate or to just revel in that lost glory without doing anything to regain it in the modern day.
@jaivijaysaheb@AdityaSatsangi It's the oldest religion WHICH WE KNOW OF. Your tweet assumes that we have already discovered every religion or artifact from the past, which we haven't.
@altageno@AdityaSatsangi Another insane POV
Sanskrit is an evolution of proto-indo-european, but it is very close to PIE.
Greek is more far-removed from PIE because it evolved over time
Also, proto-indo-europeans didn't conquer: they f*cked their way across eurasia (hence why do many descendants of PIE!)
@MlechhaLaundry@Polaapaan@AdityaSatsangi AFAIK Vedic Sanskrit is a language which doesn't evolve over time due to it ONLY being used in times like worship, making it a dead language, because it doesn't change over time like it used to.