〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙

🏳️‍⚧️ | T̴͙̎́r̶̨̢̻̈́͌ȃ̴̞̩n̵̫̯̿̒͆s̵̜͕͉̄́̕h̵̖̟͗̉u̵̖̼̬͗͋m̸̾̋́ͅa̶̼͉͒n̴̛̝ȋ̵̲̜̀̋ş̶͕̺̈́t̸̖̾̔̾

¿ʇɐɥʇ ǝʞᴉ˥ suoᴉʇɔunɟ ɹoʇoɯ ɹnoʎ ˥oɹʇuoɔ ǝɯ ʇǝ˥ ɐuuoƃ ʎ˥˥ɐǝɹ

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@Lifeonwheels95 Can I get an exfil?

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@sheawilliamsy @SexMattersOrg One of a great many things the lot of them are misinformed on.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@PascalFern26527 @IsabeauVidal The irony of making such an association when a legalised witch hunt of trans people is precisely what is being fought for by these individuals.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@JocastaMoney You get on with your life and find something actually worth your finite existence.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@GreenFemsUK @marksandspencer I'd stay away from market trading and legal commentary, as you understand neither. 🤷🏽‍♀️

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@macstreams @speakoutsister "You are what you eat" - makes sense, brains made of kids food that all looks the exact same shade of yellow.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@UnionMac1 @lisakirbie None of this means anything to any of us.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@speakoutsister "We don't serve your kind here".

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@ThomsAdrian @thespikyclub @SexMattersOrg @FondOfBeetles Actually, the law very much deals with "this sort of thing". We know you really, really want to legitisimise a legal witch-hunt, but it's unlikely to happen, least of all to give the public the license for vigilantism you're so very thirsty for.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@SexMattersOrg No it isn't.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

Sex in the context that reveals medical information - which is the SOLE purpose of why you want to ask for this data - can become special category data and require equivalent heightened protection.

Frothing at the mouth to legalise your trans witch-hunt, noxious cretins.

[Sex Matters @SexMattersOrg]

NEW: We have written to the Minister for Women and Equalities Bridget Phillipson, calling on her to withdraw the “asking about sex” section of the EHRC code of practice for service providers because it is legally wrong.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@SexMattersOrg You've been told how and why it can constitute special category data and - given the specific intent behind the request and the resulting private health and medical information that can be inferred from its divulgence - it is legally questionable and risks breaching privacy law.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@BeingProblem Probably because it's an incomprehensible falsehood. Anyone can like men, women, both or neither.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@SexMattersOrg @MForstater @DailyMail Given that private medical information can be inferred from the answer to that question, it risks breaching GDPR. The kind of services you'll be expecting to ask this question have no right to special category personal data. It's not absurd in slightest, "Sex Matters".

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@windupgemma One: Rock up and be noxious stank on a level that warrants ejection from the premises.
Two: Record the ejection sequence, play victim and feign disbelief after event.
Three: Social media post.

Optional step: Frame the cause as anything but noxious stank.

Suprised Pikachu.gif

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@Waffles2026 @PowerLunch_biz It's E, bro.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@LGBAllies_Cymru @IsabeauVidal Exclude who, and on what basis? Trans people can be LGB - the ruling doesn't stop this. You may still associate with them in light of said ruling under the umbrella, unless there's underlying abhorrence of trans people regardless of sexuality and the aim is blanket rejection. 🤔

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@artdecorated123 @KaskaJessica Incorrect. It's the perfect - and cheapest - solution.

[〽️σσɳƈαƙҽ✨🩷💛💙 @CyberVexed]

@Lifeonwheels95 Alongside football hooliganism, drinking fizzy piss and cluelessness.