So you're saying it's financially responsible to keep murders and rapists on the taxpayer dime even after all their due process has been exhausted. Whether it be on death row or in gen pop. That's the core of this debate. I don't think it is and you do.
And also shouldn't finances and morality be somewhat linked? But that's another debate
@VastAttack@ccc1354@VoteHub Hey if you want your tax dollars going to feed and house someone that raped a 3 yr old then go for it, I just don't agree with it but apparently, you do. To each their own I guess
In your first comment you stated that the death penalty is more expensive, and that's true with appeals and court costs and everything else that is involved in our legal system and due process. That part is all over now for these people, the cost of all of that has already been paid by the taxpayer. So yes, in these examples it would be cheaper for a 9mm bullet, rather than keeping them alive on the taxpayer's dime for the foreseeable future. The taxpayers have now paid for due process (which is correct) but now that part is over and there should be no more tax burden for the people
I must have missed the part where I said, "let's kill innocent people". In your first comment you stated that the death penalty is more expensive, and that's true with appeals and court costs and everything else that is involved in our legal system and due process. That part is all over now for these people, the cost of all of that has already been paid by the taxpayer. So yes, in these examples it would be cheaper for a 9mm bullet, rather than keeping them alive on the taxpayer's dime for the foreseeable future. The taxpayers have now paid for due process (which is correct) but now that part is over and there should be no more tax burden for the people