Ultraviolet is the network made with L2 RGB smart contracts by the creators of RGB - @pandoraprime_ch and @dr_orlovsky
It comes with zk-STARK provers, post-blockchain scalability layer 1 Prime, AI agents & data availability layer Storm
Follow @UVioletAI along the road of building most decentralized and scalable system in the world
The @rgbconsortium & @dr_orlovsky have released RGB I.0 — a scalable smart contract system for #Bitcoin & Lightning using client-side validation, zk-STARKs, and single-use seals. 🟥🟩🟦
https://t.co/BAr66rewKC
Once you understand:
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) are misnomers. They are in fact, *licensing* schemes where rich, powerful and systemically important banks can money-launder with impunity, while preventing competition from smaller firms.
RGB yellow paper is released: the first formally specified scalable smart contract system for Bitcoin & Lightning, made with client-side validation
https://t.co/JVK4HqEc8u
Follow us for more updates!
We support the idea of zk-libre software.
This opinion may be an unpopular one, but creative John Galts of tomorrow will think differently and will do their exit anyway.
Libre software is dead.
Long live zk-libre software.
The libre software was created to protect the rights of consumers: when they buy software, they must get the whole thing, not a part: (0) ability to run, (1) ability to learn from how it is done, (2) ability to redistribute, (3) ability to modify.
Well, this was an excellent strategy against Microsoft and alike. But today, it turns it back to individual developers, investing years and their money to do the R&D - and then having large companies just stealing the result.
This is fixable - by what I call zk-libre software.
Zk-libre software grants the following FIVE core freedoms to the consumer:
(I) ability to run,
(II) ability to learn - from reverse-engineering, or docs and specs, coming with it,
(III) ability to redistribute,
(IV) ability to modify a reverse-engineered version or a re-implementation, created by learning the specs and docs,
(V) ability to ensure the software has no backdoors and is formally-verifiable to be safe and secure, as well as proven not to misuse the user data.
It also protects DEVELOPERS rights, their intellectual work and allows them to receive the reward and funding they deserve.
These all are achieved by zk-proofs of the software properties. It would take decade(s) to make it possible, but we should start already today.
The software which will be developed by individuals and meritocratic teams, with no spirit of egalitarianism and leftism, poisoning “open source” fake idol of today.
Libre software is dead.
Long live zk-libre software.
The libre software was created to protect the rights of consumers: when they buy software, they must get the whole thing, not a part: (0) ability to run, (1) ability to learn from how it is done, (2) ability to redistribute, (3) ability to modify.
Well, this was an excellent strategy against Microsoft and alike. But today, it turns it back to individual developers, investing years and their money to do the R&D - and then having large companies just stealing the result.
This is fixable - by what I call zk-libre software.
Zk-libre software grants the following FIVE core freedoms to the consumer:
(I) ability to run,
(II) ability to learn - from reverse-engineering, or docs and specs, coming with it,
(III) ability to redistribute,
(IV) ability to modify a reverse-engineered version or a re-implementation, created by learning the specs and docs,
(V) ability to ensure the software has no backdoors and is formally-verifiable to be safe and secure, as well as proven not to misuse the user data.
It also protects DEVELOPERS rights, their intellectual work and allows them to receive the reward and funding they deserve.
These all are achieved by zk-proofs of the software properties. It would take decade(s) to make it possible, but we should start already today.
The software which will be developed by individuals and meritocratic teams, with no spirit of egalitarianism and leftism, poisoning “open source” fake idol of today.
This is a landslide and no one talks about it.
Since 2023, two Swiss Cantons have voted to include the Right to Digital Integrity in their constitution with more than 94% and 91% scores.
One will vote this year, four are debating it in their Parliament. From the four, one has explicit support from the government and we can expect a vote in 2026.
The city of Strasbourg in France has followed through and voted unanimously a motion pledging to respect its citizens digital integrity.
In Germany, political parties are starting to include it in their programmes.
This is a landslide! Since we pushed the idea more than 15 years ago, we couldn't imagine it was going to go that fast.
It has already real life consequences in Geneva, in the debate on using non-free software in schools, or in the pledge of the government to keep physical access to administrative procedures.
The right to digital integrity even made it to the Swiss Federal Tribunal and was recognized as a fundamental right in a jurisprudence.
It includes the right to an offline life, the right not to be surveilled, measured and analyzed, the right not to be judged by a machine, the right to be forgotten, the right for security in the digital space.
But almost no university, almost no specialist of data protection is studying or mentioning. Even a deep legal research study about digital human rights published in 2024 completely missed to explore the phenomenon.
Data protection specialists, even in Switzerland, continue to disregard this phenomenon arguing we should just double down on failing data protection laws, rather looking for another solution.
It doesn't matter, adoption will just continue. Why? Because it helps local politicians to answer simple questions like: should we upgrade to office 365, should we use some foreign cloud service, should we just send the profile data of our children to another country for free?
Many governments are saying we have no alternative. But this is just a lie, pushed by lazy people that prefer staying in their comfort zone and are promoted in doing so.
The Right to Digital Integrity is turning the tide. It is about stopping to build public services that harm peoples digital integrity.
In Luzerne, they understood that. At the same time the government fired the security chief for refusing to endorse implementing Office 365, the Parliament introduce a motion to add the right to digital integrity to its constitution, because protecting their citizens is more important than keeping some people in their comfort zone.
LNP/BP Standards Association announces RGB version 0.12 with the release candidate 1. As of today, it is the most tested and robust version.
Over the last half of the year, we have brought zk-STARK readiness to the RGB (making it "zk-STARKy"), a huge performance boost, and a lot of simplification and security improvements.
The release candidate is for all developers working with RGB, so they can integrate it into their software.
This is huge!
Congrats to @radicle, @cloudhead and kudos for the amazing and tireless work they have been putting into the project.
And congrats to all of us on finally having a solid and decentralised alternative to @github!
📢 Today, we are pleased to announce that Radicle 1.0 is ready for everyone to use!
After five months of feedback and 17 release candidates, we are finally ready to call this release stable.
Read the blog post for details, and give it a spin. 🎊
https://t.co/yqtXuvDvIn
Many underestimate the risk of not having censorship-resistent high-load computing (able to run at least linear algebra in parallel
Mode - what humans call "AI" and "ML" today) - and overestimate the value of money comparing to it.
When you have a gun and is among some apes, it doesn't matter how much "sound and hard money" those apes have.
Intelligence (as an ability to outperform others in your computing capacity in creating models of the world around) is the ultimate "gun" - and all humans, not able to do that outperformance, are the apes.
Without censorship-resistant scalable computing we will just have tyranny of the scale we never had in the past - and bitcoin-as-money won't save from that.
That's why since 2017 we are building crnsorship-resistance computing platform, and work on technology backing it, like in @UVioletAI and #RGB
#FreeAI https://t.co/5cP5Js71LS
I think cryptography is more important than consciousness. The later is overrated, the former is underrated.
Cryptography is the foundation for being an individual. It is the source of the Self. Consciousness is just a mere thread of coherent computing. Useful, but thats't: not critical for anything.
Radicle now has full Tor support, working with SOCKS5 and transparent proxies. This means nodes can be accessed via .onion addresses, letting peers behind NATs connect directly and privately.
🧅 Embrace the onion: https://t.co/hR340G1sQx
“Cryptocurrency is not about getting mass adoption from normies, it’s about building a new financial system.”
An interview with legendary hacker Amir Taaki (@Narodism) about crypto, Linux, open-source software, and the future of technology: https://t.co/kgvnAYNIbo
Why is Privacy in Web3 Under Attack 🥷 happening now!
Discussing the motivations and fears behind the latest attacks, and how builders can position themselves to avoid persecution.
@_polto_, @dr_ukolova, @ArnaudSalomonCH, @cvhessert & @adrianbrink
📣Official statement: the new EU chat controls proposal for mass scanning is the same old surveillance with new branding.
Whether you call it a backdoor, a front door, or “upload moderation” it undermines encryption & creates significant vulnerabilities
https://t.co/g0xNNKqquA