D4N 🔺

[D4N 🔺 @D4N310]

https://t.co/KF4e8c8A76

[The Best @TheBestqueenx]

When your government tells you; "we're all in the same boat!"

[Killa @KillaXBT]

My Super Cycle Prediction.

1972 Gold vs $BTC.

Precious metals enter a multi-year bear market. Gold and silver top out and trend lower into what could become a 5-7-year decline.

Then... capital flows into the only major asset that hasn't been inflated.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

📣🚨The Free Speech Union is mounting a legal challenge against the Government over its official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as 'anti-Muslim hatred' — and its appointment of a new 'tsar' to punish people who fall foul of it.

This amounts to a Muslim blasphemy law via the back door. The definition is vague and subjective, and will be weaponised to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam, Muslims, and Islamic practices and history.

The FSU’s General Secretary, Lord Young of Acton, said: “This is the most serious threat to free speech the Government has come up with so far — the only area in which it’s achieving any success.

“If we don’t win this fight, tens of thousands of people a year could lose their jobs at the say-so of a Labour-appointed ‘tsar’. It’s dystopian.”

Public bodies will adopt this definition — despite it being non-statutory — with the same zeal the police have shown in investigating and recording non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs). It is predicted by one of the drafters of the definition that it could lead to around 20,000 reports of 'anti-Muslim hostility' a year. At present, the number of recorded anti-Muslim hate crimes is around 4,000.

In a free society, no religion should be shielded from legitimate criticism. This proposal places one faith above the rest.

The Free Speech Union is bringing a legal challenge on two grounds.

First, the definition relies on nebulous, legally undefined terms such as “negative and prejudicial stereotyping of Muslims”, making it incoherent and irrational — and ripe for weaponisation.

Second, adopting such a definition cuts across legislation already enacted by Parliament and therefore breaches the public law principle known as “occupying the field”. Under this established public law doctrine, new regulations, put in place by ministers, must not replace existing legislation. It is constitutionally unlawful. In this case, the body responsible for protecting Muslims from discrimination is the Equality and Human Rights Commission, not an anti-Muslim hostility 'tsar'.

Parliament voted to abolish blasphemy laws 18 years ago. We can't let this Government resurrect them via the back door.

This is one of the biggest battles the Free Speech Union has ever taken on in its six years — and we need your help. Judicial reviews are expensive, but this is a fight we felt we had to take on.

Donate to our crowdfunder below👇

[Killa @KillaXBT]

After denial comes capitulation. ⚡️

$BTC

[MASTER POOL @mrpooln]

This video has absolutely blown up on Telegram and I am being told it might be removed from YouTube so here it is.

[D4N 🔺 @D4N310]

@SimplyBitcoin Genesis block

[The New Culture Forum @NewCultureForum]

It is with deepest sorrow that we announce the passing of Peter Whittle, founder and director of the New Culture Forum.

Peter passed away yesterday evening surrounded by his loved ones.

It is hard to overstate the impact Peter and the NCF have had on Britain’s cultural and political landscape since he founded the NCF twenty years ago.

Peter’s courage, passion, integrity, wit and intellect inspired millions in Britain and around the world to think critically, challenge cultural orthodoxies, and champion free speech.

The NCF will continue to honour Peter’s vision and values.

Rest in peace, @prwhittle.

[D4N 🔺 @D4N310]

@leeharris Go to Settings and privacy > Privacy and Safety > About your account and change to ‘use region / continent’ instead of ‘country’

[Bold @boldleonidas]

“The Crypto President”

[Michael McCarthy @punishablepress]

No Digital ID? No Work.

You always have the choice whether to go along with it or refuse.

It was the same during Covid, what will you do this time?

[TFTC @TFTC21]

Death of financial freedom...

The truth of Central Bank Digital Currencies:

[DonAlt @DonAlt]

USD down almost 15% since the beggining of the year
We denominate in USD so if your coin isn't up 16% this year you're actually down

Such a scam

[Dominic Frisby @DominicFrisby]

The lighter side of hyper-inflationary collapse … in song.
(Sound on)

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨 When they tell you Digital ID isn’t mandatory, remember this…

On 1 September, 86 MILLION bank accounts will be suspended in Vietnam because their owners have not registered for biometric digital ID, including fingerprints and facial recognition.

These details are tied into a centralised national database, giving the government a single file on each citizen’s identity, assets, spending and movements.

Until they comply, people will have no access to their own money.

See how easy it is? 🚨

[941 @level941]

Trump Golden Bull.

192k (3-6 months)
Retrace
No 2 year bear market.
No 1 year bear market.

6 months bear.
71-75k bottom.
Market it up in 2027
333k next target.
Half a million by 2030.

Tesla numerology and vortex math.

Diminishing returns = diminishing bear market

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Important.

From April 2027, every person who saves any money will have to hand their National Insurance (NI) number to their bank under new rules signed off by Rachel Reeves.

So the all powerful HMRC can help themselves to money they decide you owe.

Imagine what the government will help themselves to when you are forced to have digital ID.

[Dominic Frisby @DominicFrisby]

The UK Financial Conduct Authority has announced that it is loosening its anti-bitcoin stance. From October 8th retail UK investors will now be able to buy bitcoin ETFs.

Finally.

The ban came in with bitcoin at $5,000. Today it's $115,000. That’s $110,000/coin UK investors have been protected from. Great job guys.

Does this announcement mark the top of the market for bitcoin? There would be a poetic irony if it did, but it won't. Bitcoin is so much bigger than the FCA.

At present, it does not even look like a case of buy the rumour, sell the news. Bitcoin has actually sold off a few percent since the announcement.

But this change in tack is going to have a huge impact. It's about a lot more than British retail investors. It's global.

It's going to have an impact on the bitcoin treasury companies around the world, and it's going to have an impact on the bitcoin price itself.

Here’s why.

We’ll start with the announcement itself from David Geale, executive director of payments and digital finance at the FCA:

'Since we restricted retail access to cETNs, the market has evolved, and products have become more mainstream and better understood. In light of this, we're providing consumers with more choice, while ensuring there are protections in place. This should mean people get the information they need to assess whether the level of risk is right for them.'

Blah blah, waffle waffle.

Absolutely no ownership of the FCA's calamitous regulation whatsoever.

Fortunes have been lost to British investors because of the FCA. How is it these bodies are so totally unaccountable? Perhaps everyone who was involved in that decision should be made to compensate British investors for their loss of earnings.

"We're providing consumers with more choice,". Please. There's gaslighting for you right there.

Moving on.

Obviously, UK investors are now going to be able to buy bitcoin ETFs through their brokers, which means we can hold them in our SIPPs and ISAs. I gather there is roughly £3 trillion in UK pensions, £750 billion in ISAs, £500 billion in SIPPs and quite a bit more in other brokerage accounts. So that is a lot of capital that can now come into bitcoin which previously could not.

But there is a lot more to it than that.

The institutional floodgates are about to open.

(see next link to continue reading)

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

What you might not realise is that In the UK, digital ID is becoming mandatory, one group of people at a time.

The government is rolling it out in phases by targeting people it already regulates or funds. Hoping you won’t notice & kick up a stink.

Next up is ALL company directors. There are about 6 million of them. They don’t have to comply but if they don’t, they can’t be a director. Not even of their own 1 employee business.

Soon, you’ll need digital ID to work, get legal help, or access your pension.

There’s no single law introducing a national ID scheme. Instead, it’s being stitched together quietly through:

▪️Companies Act reforms (voted through)
▪️Digital Economy Act powers
▪️One Login rollouts (no vote)
▪️Quango rules and secondary legislation
▪️The upcoming Data Protection and Digital Information Bill

There is no opt out and your opinion is not required. So when the press nudges you on Digital ID, just note, it’s already here 🔥

[Dominic Frisby @DominicFrisby]

Open letter to @RachelReevesMP now in video form

Hashtag Stamp Duty!

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

⚠️The Government is considering forcing the entire UK population onto a digital ID scheme called ‘BritCard’’

An inquiry is now open & we've created an easy guide for you to say #No2DigitalID

Make your voice heard⤵️
https://t.co/48lpBqFa2b