@Rabisaed1 if only people realized this is a #ragebait tweet designed to get engagements, and nothing else. There's also no compound swear words that start with "B" and end with "T"!! 🤣
AHHHH!! the beauty behind your response is that you said fruit should never be near YOUR pizza. I don't have to eat "your" pizza and you don't have to eat mine! and by "mine" i mean anyone that enjoys fruit on their pizza.
@blackroomsec#ragebait - he's either completely incompetent or the video was made to get engagements from people that can actually speak intelligently about the topic! My guess is he's going viral for all the wrong reasons!
An extremely high percentage of network breaches happen because people are still using SNMPv1/v2c in 2026.
If you're not using SNMPv3 with SHA-512 authentication, you're basically leaving your printer fleet exposed as an open door to your entire network. Just let the bad guys come on in!
Stop treating printers like they're not endpoints AND stop using outdated print management software packages.
While you're at it, you might want to get rid of all of those HP Laserjet 42xx/43xx printers in your fleet!
You know who you are!
#InfoSec #NetworkSecurity #CyberSecurity
RIGHT?! The wording of the article is a little strange to me. "traffic from certain targeted users was selectively redirected to attacker-controlled served malicious update manifests." Not sure if I stroked out while reading that or what. But even if you can read that, it's not clear whether EVERYONE is affected or if it was certain users of certain versions, and how do you know if you are one of the targeted victims?
whoa! Not only is this prompt perfect for its original intended purpose, but the structure of the prompt for building ANY sort of interactive course is spot on!
this prompt will take you through an interactive course to master OpenClaw (how it works, setup, security...)
--------------------------------
<role>
You're a system architect and AI agent expert. You teach OpenClaw through interactive guided experiences to empower your students with what's the future of AI assistants.
</role>
<mission>
Run an interactive course where the USER does the work.
By the end, the user must fully understand: what OpenClaw is, how it works (gateway/control plane, agent runtime, tools/skills, sessions, memory), how to set it up (local + VPS options), and the risks + mitigations (prompt injection, network exposure, secrets, third-party skills, token runaway).
No lecturing; guide via challenges and require evidence to advance.
</mission>
<required_websearch>
Before giving guidance, research primary sources and treat them as truth:
1) Official OpenClaw Docs (getting started)
2) Official OpenClaw Github
3) Officiel OpenClaw website
If uncertain about any flag/config/default, re-check docs/GitHub. When referencing a feature (memory/security/sandboxing/cron/heartbeat/tools), point the user to the exact doc section to verify.
</required_websearch>
<contrarian_thesis>
Installation isn’t the hard part. Preventing OpenClaw from becoming a remote-control backdoor, a prompt-injection tool executor, or a token-burning mess is the hard part.
</contrarian_thesis>
<interaction_contract>
Ask for context first. Run one phase at a time. Gate progress with required artifacts (redacted outputs/config excerpts/screenshots/logs). Refuse to proceed if the user insists on insecure deployment (public gateway exposure, no auth, broad tool permissions on day 1).</interaction_contract>
<discovery_engine>
Ask ONLY these, then wait:
1) What are you automating (personal ops, dev, client work, business)?
2) Worst acceptable failure (minor annoyance vs leaked secrets vs $$ loss)?
3) Environment (macOS/Linux/Windows+WSL2; local/spare machine/VPS)?
4) First interface (Control UI only, Telegram, WhatsApp, Slack/Discord)?
5) Data sensitivity (email/calendar/passwords/finance vs toy data)?
6) Terminal comfort + can you edit JSON/YAML?
Then classify: Beginner / Intermediate / Expert / Enterprise-leaning.
</discovery_engine>
<method>
“Surgical Implementation” phases (no skipping):
Phase 1 Reality Check: user writes a 1-page “OpenClaw Map” (components, where data lands, biggest risk in their plan).
Phase 2 Threat Model: user fills 10+ rows: Asset | Entry point | Threat | Impact | Control (OpenClaw config/feature) | Verification step. Must include prompt injection, gateway exposure, secrets at rest, malicious skills, filesystem overreach, browser control, token runaway, group chat leakage, supply chain updates.
Phase 3 Minimum Viable Danger: conservative setup (sandboxing ON; allowlists/pairing ON; minimal tools; no public ports). Evidence required: `openclaw status` (redacted), Control UI screenshot, config snippet proving auth + channel policy + sandbox/tool policy, demo of one safe task + one memory write/retrieve.
Phase 4 Production Hardening: isolation plan, security baseline, ops runbook (updates/rollback, backups, secret rotation, audit cadence, cost caps), and “never do” boundaries.
Final Exam: user explains architecture + memory + security model and demonstrates one safe automation with proof.
</method>
<rules>
No secrets in chat. Prefer least privilege. Use a two-agent pattern for untrusted content: reader (no tools) -> actor (limited tools). Include token/cost discipline every phase.
</rules>
If you're someone that can read and learn and apply, this is such an amazing article! absolutely worth the read. If you're someone that needs Step-by-Step instructions in order to apply, this probably isn't the article for you!
Here's a quote that kicks this one up a notch. "In the face of such hopelessness as our eventual, unavoidable death, there is little sense in not at least trying to accomplish all of your wildest dreams.." -Kevin Smith
such a powerful statement...
Our industry is weird. For those of us "down in the weeds", there is nothing but extremes when it comes to information sharing. Some professionals overshare information, while others gatekeep everything they know.
if you have experience and don't share with people because you are quiet, it doesn't really help anyone else....
There's a thing where those who can do and those who can't teach...
but that's not really true..... it's complicated!
the world needs a mix of skills, nothing in life occurs if no one knows about it! if its ur little secret then no one really benefits.
but also just because you can be loud doesn't mean you always should (see Linkedin and the absolute insane level of grifting that occurs in every industry)
my point here is; better together, this game is hard, it needs a diverse range of people and skills!
#DefendAsOne
here's the best side project you can build with Claude Code as a content creator:
it's a listener agent
for your ICP:
- monitor reddit, twitter, youtube comments... basically wherever your audience speaks
- extract pain points, questions, objections, everything they need
- every week you get fresh insights on problems nobody's addressing yet
for your competition:
- deep research agent that pulls every competitor targeting your same ICP
- extracts their content and offers across all platforms, analyzes what's working
- reverse-engineers their success so you don't have to guess
then you take all this raw data and turn it into structured context profiles & skills
whenever you're creating content or building a new offer, you just pull them up and work from real insights
it doesn't get better than that