Damon Drandakis

[Damon Drandakis @DDrandakis]

As diesel costs go up, 15 minute cities become more of a reality, and no more red meat, and get ready to eat bugs!

[Matt Bracken @Matt_Bracken48]

A total of 781 migrants crossed the English Channel on Wednesday - the highest number for a single day this year

[Damon Drandakis @DDrandakis]

@LakotaMan1 I agree but the Evil Deep State running our country and the world could never allow that. Vote Libertarian, Communist, Independent, Green Party, and forget Democrats and Republicans. Both parties are bought and paid for!

[Lakota Man @LakotaMan1]

Exactly

[Ben Swann @BenSwann_]

THIS IS HOW POPULAR ANTI-WAR INFLUENCERS SUDDENLY BECAME ZELENSKY’S PUPPETS

United24 is a Ukrainian government initiative Volodymyr Zelenskyy created after the 2022 war with Russia. Its stated mission is to unite individuals, companies, and partners in support of Ukraine.

But the war did not only unfold on the battlefield. It also launched an information war, one where separating fact from fiction became increasingly difficult.

Remember the “Ghost of Kyiv”? Viral videos claimed a lone Ukrainian fighter pilot had shot down as many as six Russian aircraft. The story spread worldwide before it was revealed to be false.

Investigative journalist Elizabeth Lane reports that Ukraine’s messaging campaign may have gone beyond viral stories and social-media trolling.

As per her reporting, American veterans, including former special operations personnel with YouTube channels and other platforms, were offered money and access in exchange for producing pro-Ukraine content.
Some were reportedly offered up to $10,000.

Lane says United24, a state-backed Ukrainian fundraising and communications initiative, made the offers. One influencer appears to acknowledge the arrangement on camera.

If true, that raises serious questions. American donations, taxpayer dollars, and other support flow into United24, while the organization may also be funding messaging meant to shape American views of the war.

@imelizabethlane investigated the operation and the question at its center: are American taxpayer dollars being used to fund a covert influence campaign that advances pro-Ukraine narratives and sustains support for the war?

[Damon Drandakis @DDrandakis]

The Club of Rome continues to reach more of their goals! 1mm Ukrainians killed, refineries are being blown up, diesel costs are rising, and many people will now starve to death!

[Zara Quinn @_Zaraquin]

America lectures the world about freedom. The UN lectures the world about international law. Then a war criminal walks into the UN, gives a speech, and walks right back out. WHAT A FUCKINGG JOKE

[Damon Drandakis @DDrandakis]

@jimmy_dore I'm not surprised most of the commercials on those networks are Pharmaceutical

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

Henry Ford DECLINED to attend the House Oversight Hearing after we found its own data showed ALL 22 chronic disease categories were higher in vaccinated children.

Their refusal to testify on their own study BACKFIRED... as I was able to expose the buried findings myself.

[Jimmy Dore @jimmy_dore]

Pro vaccine scientists not only don’t “Trust The Science” they suppress, hide, and bury the science. To the point of hiding the results of THEIR OWN studies.

Great job by @NicHulscher of exposing them to the results of their own research & scientific studies:

[Jake Shields @jakeshieldsajj]

Ed Sheeran is a spineless coward

[Sam Tripoli @samtripoli]

Would

[Ben Swann @BenSwann_]

NATO TESTED SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION ON SOLDIERS. THEN CALLED IT DEFENSE

NATO’s recruitment video presents soldiers heading to war as “the future” and calls the alliance a defender of freedom and democracy. But if it is meant to portray the future, why does it feature only white European soldiers? In an era when nearly every major campaign emphasizes diversity, that choice stands out.

Is this how NATO shapes the information environment around itself? NATO’s Strategic Communications Center of Excellence, StratCom, says it helps allies defend against online disinformation. It produces research, training, and guidance on digital threats.

But in 2019, StratCom ran social-media experiments using fake Facebook pages and profiles to target military personnel. Researchers used public information to identify about 150 soldiers, learn details about their lives, draw them into a fake network through targeted ads, and test whether they could influence real-world behavior. According to the results, they could.

Wired reported the researchers tracked troop movements and influenced participants to act against orders, all for about $60.

NATO called it a red-team exercise designed to identify vulnerabilities and improve defenses. Later that year, StratCom bought fake engagement: comments, likes, views, and followers. For roughly 300 euros, it received more than 3,500 comments, 25,000 likes, 20,000 views, and 5,000 followers.

Researchers identified over 18,000 accounts used to deliver it. Four weeks later, 80 percent of the fake engagement was still online. The purpose was to measure how cheaply online influence could be bought, and how poorly platforms detected it.

This does not prove NATO directed every troll campaign or anonymous attack that followed. The evidence does not establish that. But it does show NATO was studying the tools: fake accounts, bot networks, targeted messaging, bought engagement, and social engineering.

So when independent journalists report doxxing, coordinated attacks, and anonymous accounts targeting them, the question is not whether these methods are real. They are. The question is who is using them, and who is coordinating them.

Independent journalist Elizabeth Lane says an online network targeted independent creators by circulating personal information, coordinating attacks, and amplifying them across X.

After the Ukraine war began in 2022, social media flooded with viral stories, including the “Ghost of Kyiv” and the 13 heroes of Snake Island. The Snake Island story claimed Ukrainian defenders refused to surrender and were killed by a Russian warship. It went viral. But the soldiers survived and were later reported in Russian custody.

That does not prove NATO created or spread the story. But it underscores what NATO and Western governments already understood: information warfare works.

NATO StratCom materials identify Ukrainian social-media analytics company Singularex as a collaborator on studies involving manipulation tools and services.
The documented record shows a network studying fake accounts, bot networks, targeted messaging, purchased engagement, social engineering, and online influence.

@imelizabethlane joins me to break it down.

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

Yes.

[Owen Shroyer @OwenShroyer1776]

Wouldn't the fake outrage be those who complained when it was Biden but defend it when it is Trump?

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile Today in the UK

Bus after Bus after Bus after Bus

All containing Military Age Fighting Migrants from many Backwards thinking Countries.

Observe their Tax Payer Funded Multiple Police Escort.

This looks like a planned, well prepared, well resource, Military Style Operation importing a foreign army - it’s because it is.

[Mr. Sausage @MrSausageGet]

So China allegedly interfered in the 2020 election which allegedly led to a win for Joe Biden who flooded our borders, mandated poison death shots, etc.

But, Xi and Trump are good buddies now?

Everything is just fine?

WTF is this sorcery

[Jimmy Dore @jimmy_dore]

Good for @ggreenwald thanks for putting the Zionist on that panel in his place:

[Douglas Macgregor @DougAMacgregor]

👀

[Jake Shields @jakeshieldsajj]

The real history