kelvin Klein

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

I just aped 5 wrap of $EBA
@HIamNosa

0x5f4036CEB04204563750579D6601b440d2Ef3963

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

https://t.co/HG7teUNZmY

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

GM
$WOOF

Do not be sidelined
CA
0xA912C71c0e53701153cAd9ba73E9B7D854418eaE

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@web3righteous GM

[BagFI @bagfifun]

The integration with @Morpho has been completed.

Now you’ll be able to borrow not just memes, but also tokens supported by Morpho, expanding the possibilities.

Go here and try it out: https://t.co/soMVSNlr3L

[Solana @solana]

A̶r̶t̶i̶f̶i̶c̶i̶a̶l̶ Super Intelligence on Solana

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@zandyor 8RPFPGSJdkaXGfyMzyD47ryj6W6ntUrtZuwHxyH1dQQJ

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@SamuelXeus I think you have said this before even before fomo and pumpfun
You thought me how to manage my capital... Thank you for always dishing out knowledge

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@web3righteous @Joshy_159 GM

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@web3righteous @Virex_onchain Am good mama

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

https://t.co/Geq2YzE4mJ

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@BigSultan0 @fahhgang @Neez_EN @CalebSol

0xa73b7fc74bcA8f065Ae261c3af4BC5AE05E3bcc3

[fahhhhh. @fahhgang]

NFT LAUNCH IN LESS THAN 72hrs

Drop EVM wallet address - Retweet

first 50 comments Gets whitelisted

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@fahhgang We are over 200 comment
But I will still try

0xa73b7fc74bcA8f065Ae261c3af4BC5AE05E3bcc3

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

Ignorant is not a bliss
Go for knowledge

[Kweenwealth#WID @wealthykween]

Let's Go Back to Education.

Crypto Twitter has been loud today, and it's shown me something: we're using words we haven't taken the time to understand.

A token launched. The price dropped. And suddenly the creator is being dragged as a "rug puller."

Here's the difference:

A rug pull is when a creator drains liquidity, or uses contract control to stop people from selling. It's a structural exploit. Holders have no exit.

A dump is when holders, including the creator, sell their tokens and the price falls. Painful, yes. But it's market behavior, not a technical exploit.

On launchpads like https://t.co/vonX0i8Yz3, @ponsdotfamily the creator typically can't touch the liquidity.

The platform controls that layer. So a creator selling their early bag is not the same as pulling liquidity.

And often, other early buyers hold more supply than the creator, so their selling can crash a token just as hard.

None of this means creator sells are always fine.

Transparency matters, and a creator who hypes a community and quietly exits has still broken trust.

But we can hold people accountable without misusing the language.

Also: nobody forced you into that trade.
That’s why we have a term called DYOR…

You bought knowing the risk. Call it a bad launch, a bad trade, or a lesson, but let's stop calling everything a rug.

If we want a stronger ecosystem, especially across Africa, education has to come before outrage.

Understand decentralization.

Understand how liquidity works.

Read the contract before you ape.

Words have meaning. Let's use them properly.

As you were… IRE ooo

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@wealthykween Thank you so much

Ignorant is not really a bliss

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@BigSultan0 They are angry that she didn't airdrop them before lunch

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

@web3righteous
If only you know how people you feed this week
Personally I made $70 with my $10
And as a newbie I have never traded a meme coin so transparent

Like you can actually see that it's the community that is moving the chat

You are a super woman ♀️
Period

[PARELLA™💕🐅 @web3righteous]

public clarification on the pink token

i’ve seen the conversations and accusations circulating online regarding the pink token, particularly two claims: that i launched the token with a cabal and that i rugged the token.

i normally don’t feel the need to explain myself, but i’m making this post for the people in my community who genuinely believe in me, trust me, and deserve clarity.

from the beginning of my journey in this space, i’ve always been transparent about how i make money online, the things i build, and the things i participate in. so i want to address this with facts.

1. i did not launch with a cabal.

pons launched the token at approximately $4k market cap, and i posted it when it was around $5k market cap.

nobody knew about the launch beforehand from my side. i even asked on the timeline if i should proceed with posting it, and the response was yes.

if i had a cabal behind the launch, i would have bought and controlled the floor. i didn’t.

i did not buy the floor, and i was not holding the floor. the community and other traders determined how the token moved.

2. i did not rug the token.

the supply i acquired through the creator’s wallet is verifiable on-chain.

that entire supply was subsequently sent out as airdrops. all of it.

the money i made came from creator fees. from those fees, i also paid the dex fees and still distributed part of the proceeds through airdrops. what i personally made from the creator fees was less than $600.

when i account for what i initially spent to acquire the supply, i essentially just recovered my capital.

the blockchain doesn’t lie.

every transaction is on-chain and can be independently verified.

also, please understand that dex screener do not always display the most accurate or complete picture of token activity.

if you genuinely want to investigate what happened, check axiom.

like i said from the beginning, this was a social experiment, and that is exactly what it became.

the token reached an ath of around $90k market cap, dipped, and recovered multiple times.

a lot of people on the timeline also traded the token and made money from it.

at the same time, i genuinely understand that some people bought simply because they trusted me and may not have fully understood how memecoins work.

to those people, i’m truly sorry.

i never want anyone to lose money simply because they trusted my judgment without understanding the risks involved.

memecoins are extremely volatile, and everyone should always do their own research before putting money into them.

but i also won’t allow false narratives that i secretly launched with a cabal or rugged the community when the on-chain data is available for everyone to verify.

i don’t owe anyone an explanation, but i owe my community clarity.

i’ve said what i needed to say. the data is on-chain. anyone who wants to verify can do so.

peace and love. ❤️

[kelvin Klein @DEFi_HK]

$BAGFI
@bagfifun
Builders on Arc can now borrow USDC against their memecoin supply instead of selling it. No dilution. No dumping. Just capital to keep building. This is the kind of detail that gets missed early — and matters a lot later.

[Unipcs (aka 'Bonk Guy') 🎒 @theunipcs]

sentiments around $PONS is probably the lowest it's been in a long time

the closest comparable is $PUMP, a $2.7 billion market cap coin that's up 17% today

zoom out and look at the data:

- $PONS annualized revenue: $156.8m
- $PUMP annualized revenue: $463.6m
- $PONS market cap: $375m
- $PUMP market cap: $2.7b

this means PUMP is currently trading at 5.82x its annualized revenue while PONS is trading at just 2.39x

and everyone agrees that $PUMP is incredibly undervalued here by crypto standards

so how much more $PONS?

while PUMP is the dominant launchpad on Solana, PONS is the dominant launchpad on Robinhood Chain

if you think Robinhood Chain continues to remain relevant into the foreseeable future

you should be aggressively bidding $PONS here