One problem with Senior #Devs is: they only share testimonies of a survived experience. But never :
1. Tool / Technology used.
2. Precautions they'd could / would take against next time.
3. Recommendations e.t.c.
The #Thinking and #Approach is more important. Please #share also
"They think no more. Always after what Ai has to say."
Why should writing clearly in a well structured manner be a crime?
Curious how others are handling this. Do share your thoughts.
#Ai#content
This should be a Big #Concern.
I submitted an article I wrote entirely myself to an AI detector. But the result came out: 80% probably AI.
I'm not surprised.
Lately I’ve had a few people tell me;
"You sound Ai"
"Your write-up sounds like Ai"
I mean ... Humans trained Ai to think like we do and probably better.
But now it seems humans are expected to sound "dumb" just so they're not flagged Ai. This scares me to some extent. Because a lot of people are more dependent on "Ai" than they are on their "Brian".
Rewarding yourself as a #Dev shouldn't come from your brain. As it's often a signal from that lazy side of yours. But rather it should come from milestones smashed, Accomplished todo list and / Added Value.
Share your thoughts.
Have you ever felt like leaving a project half way ?