Darius Monan

Interested in Philosophy Religion and Politics

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@grok @FeinIsSmelly first in my entire country to see this btw

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@dinosaurs1969 family guy is funny

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@hm94xh @M1L4GR03 They wan't to appeal white supremacists

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@insaneposes nah this nga is dead

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@CultOfOmar @groypernewsTV nga who is using a bottle

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@hayasaka_aryan How the fuck did he assault him ? yeah he was rough but rough play isn't assault. it's not even the same kid, how can you be this mentally retarded nga.I swear to God you latino white supremacists larpers say the most retarded shit .

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@lusopommern its either a pakistan,bangladeshi or an argentinian

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@DhulQarnayni @Rurouni_Phoenix sure it's 100% literal, but in order for us to argue for a phenomenological reading we have to have some intra-Quranic evidenc.

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@DhulQarnayni @Rurouni_Phoenix All scholars agree that phenomenological /figurative passages exist in the Quran, the question is whether the ones specifically on cosmology are phenomenological.The fact is the Quran never gives us any indication that they are, that isn't to say we are

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@DhulQarnayni @Rurouni_Phoenix that of other near eastern cosmologies, and were ideas that many in that time period held to.The Quran never gives us any indication that the claims it makes are meant to be taken phenomenologically.

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@DhulQarnayni @Rurouni_Phoenix I went to the post on reddit, and all chonk posted was the perspective of that user. He wasn't using that user to argue for a literal reading of the Quran(although I know he advocates for such a view).

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@Rurouni_Phoenix @DhulQarnayni Thats true, I was just shocked that Delman kept attacking Chonk, because I thought they were on good terms.I also was dissapointed with how people were saying that apologists are allowed to be rude because their not 'neutral academics'

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@Rurouni_Phoenix @DhulQarnayni It's always been this way, as you've said even if chonk were to step down the sub would still get attacked anyway

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@DhulQarnayni @Rurouni_Phoenix Could you explain how, like is it because he bans comments unfairly or because of his christian bias.I just want to get why you believe chonk has more negative reputation ?

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@DhulQarnayni @Rurouni_Phoenix I didn't mean you. Chonk's attitude differs when he's on AQ and when he's on here, here he is toxic although he's interlocutors are not any different, while on AQ he's more calm and composed. So those on AQ may not see that side of him here.

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@DhulQarnayni @Rurouni_Phoenix While I agree that chonk can be polemical times, why drag the entire sub into the conflict. The fact is that the vast majority of people who are attacking chonk also hate AQ, and even if he were to get kicked out they would still hate on it.

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@dmontetheno1 @Leafywashere00 The problem is the discourse in this place is just horrible.For example you mention Leafy, he too was like that as well at one point especially with the many rude comments he made to words Little.

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@dmontetheno1 @Leafywashere00 and rude, and I disagree with him on many issues.I think that you should see the way muslim apologists treat him, it's never him only being rude but the apologist as well. Like of all of us he has a breaking point

[Darius Monan @DMonan25331]

@HazelAppleyard how are you guys so retarded, you do know that the fire can spread to other feelings which could be owned by white guys